IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v26y2024i4d10.1007_s10668-023-03137-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the incubating environment for investment in biogas technology in Syria by using AHP and SWOT

Author

Listed:
  • Ghaith Hasan

    (Czech University of Life Sciences Prague)

  • Jana Mazancová

    (Czech University of Life Sciences Prague)

  • Hynek Roubík

    (Czech University of Life Sciences Prague)

Abstract

In light of the massive energy supply shortage due to the Syrian war since 2011, renewable energy adoption has a high potential to cover the actual energy demand. Hence, this study aims to shed light on the factors that affect investment in biogas technology. With the scarcity of research on alternative energies in Syria, this paper focused on the characteristics of the Syrian environment toward biogas technology adoption. The results show that Syrian society accepts and desires to adopt new technologies, representing an optimal strategy to stimulate biogas technology use and the need to spread awareness about its benefits. The SWOT model was applied to identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats facing biogas technology adoption. The analytical hierarchy process model was applied to set priorities and make better decisions related to the knowledge of biogas, acceptance of biogas technology, desire for and common approach for its use, the resulting organic fertilizer, and administrative and financial aspects. The work concludes that the southern region was at the forefront in the areas studied in terms of weights of biogas technology investment criteria, subsequently, the central and later the coastal regions. By presenting a systematic and comprehensive approach, this study represents a roadmap to assist decision-makers in inking decisions related to adopting and deploying biogas technology on a larger scale and contributes to developing a criterion for selecting biogas sites in Syria.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghaith Hasan & Jana Mazancová & Hynek Roubík, 2024. "Assessment of the incubating environment for investment in biogas technology in Syria by using AHP and SWOT," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 10105-10126, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03137-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-03137-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-03137-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-03137-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Devrim Murat Yazan & Davide Cafagna & Luca Fraccascia & Martijn Mes & Pierpaolo Pontrandolfo & Henk Zijm, 2018. "Economic sustainability of biogas production from animal manure: a regional circular economy model," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 41(5), pages 605-624, April.
    2. Zhang, Lihui & Wang, Jianing & Li, Songrui, 2022. "Regional suitability analysis of the rural biogas power generation industry:A case of China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 293-306.
    3. Mukeshimana, Marie Claire & Zhao, Zhen-Yu & Ahmad, Munir & Irfan, Muhammad, 2021. "Analysis on barriers to biogas dissemination in Rwanda: AHP approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1127-1137.
    4. Kurttila, Mikko & Pesonen, Mauno & Kangas, Jyrki & Kajanus, Miika, 2000. "Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis -- a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 41-52, May.
    5. Vladimír Krepl & Husam I. Shaheen & Ghaeth Fandi & Luboš Smutka & Zdenek Muller & Josef Tlustý & Tarek Husein & Safwan Ghanem, 2020. "The Role of Renewable Energies in the Sustainable Development of Post-Crisis Electrical Power Sectors Reconstruction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-31, November.
    6. Kamran, Muhammad & Fazal, Muhammad Rayyan & Mudassar, Muhammad, 2020. "Towards empowerment of the renewable energy sector in Pakistan for sustainable energy evolution: SWOT analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 543-558.
    7. Paschalidou, A. & Tsatiris, M. & Kitikidou, K., 2016. "Energy crops for biofuel production or for food? - SWOT analysis (case study: Greece)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 636-647.
    8. V.M. Rao Tummala & Hong Ling, 1998. "A Note on the Computation of the Mean Random Consistency Index of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (Ahp)," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 221-230, June.
    9. Collins Okello & Stefania Pindozzi & Salvatore Faugno & Lorenzo Boccia, 2014. "Appraising Bioenergy Alternatives in Uganda Using Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT)-Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and a Desirability Functions Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-22, February.
    10. Burak, Selmin & Samanlioglu, Funda & Ülker, Duygu, 2022. "Evaluation of irrigation methods in Söke Plain with HF-AHP-PROMETHEE II hybrid MCDM method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    11. Longsheng, Cheng & Ali Shah, Syed Ahsan & Solangi, Yasir Ahmed & Ahmad, Munir & Ali, Sharafat, 2022. "An integrated SWOT-multi-criteria analysis of implementing sustainable waste-to-energy in Pakistan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 1438-1453.
    12. Ilbahar, Esra & Kahraman, Cengiz & Cebi, Selcuk, 2022. "Risk assessment of renewable energy investments: A modified failure mode and effect analysis based on prospect theory and intuitionistic fuzzy AHP," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    13. Olabi, A.G. & Wilberforce, Tabbi & Sayed, Enas Taha & Abo-Khalil, Ahmed G. & Maghrabie, Hussein M. & Elsaid, Khaled & Abdelkareem, Mohammad Ali, 2022. "Battery energy storage systems and SWOT (strengths, weakness, opportunities, and threats) analysis of batteries in power transmission," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    14. Tumen Ozdil, N.F. & Caliskan, M., 2022. "Energy potential from biomass from agricultural crops: Development prospects of the Turkish bioeconomy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    15. Pasquale Marcello Falcone & Edgardo Sica, 2019. "Assessing the Opportunities and Challenges of Green Finance in Italy: An Analysis of the Biomass Production Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, January.
    16. Devrim Murat Yazan & Davide Cafagna & Luca Fraccascia & Martijn Mes & Pierpaolo Pontrandolfo & Henk Zijm, 2018. "Economic sustainability of biogas production from animal manure: a regional circular economy model," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 41(5), pages 605-624, April.
    17. Al-Mohamad, Ali, 2001. "Renewable energy resources in Syria," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 365-371.
    18. Felix Cheung & Amanda Kube & Louis Tay & Edward Diener & Joshua J. Jackson & Richard E. Lucas & Michael Y. Ni & Gabriel M. Leung, 2020. "The impact of the Syrian conflict on population well-being," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    19. Afsana Akther & Tofael Ahamed & Ryozo Noguchi & Takuma Genkawa & Tomohiro Takigawa, 2019. "Site suitability analysis of biogas digester plant for municipal waste using GIS and multi-criteria analysis," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 61-93, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Syed Hammad Mian & Bashir Salah & Wadea Ameen & Khaja Moiduddin & Hisham Alkhalefah, 2020. "Adapting Universities for Sustainability Education in Industry 4.0: Channel of Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-33, July.
    2. Chanthawong, Anuman & Dhakal, Shobhakar, 2016. "Stakeholders' perceptions on challenges and opportunities for biodiesel and bioethanol policy development in Thailand," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 189-206.
    3. Marta Bottero & Chiara D’Alpaos & Alessia Marello, 2020. "An Application of the A’WOT Analysis for the Management of Cultural Heritage Assets: The Case of the Historical Farmhouses in the Aglié Castle (Turin)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Abdul, Daud & Wenqi, Jiang & Tanveer, Arsalan, 2022. "Prioritization of renewable energy source for electricity generation through AHP-VIKOR integrated methodology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1018-1032.
    5. Srđan Dimić & Dragan Pamučar & Srđan Ljubojević & Boban Đorović, 2016. "Strategic Transport Management Models—The Case Study of an Oil Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-27, September.
    6. Murillo Vetroni Barros & Rômulo Henrique Gomes Jesus & Bruno Silva Ribeiro & Cassiano Moro Piekarski, 2023. "Going in Circles: Key Aspects for Circular Economy Contributions to Agro-industrial Cooperatives," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 861-880, June.
    7. Qiang Wang & Thomas Dogot & Yueling Yang & Jian Jiao & Boyang Shi & Changbin Yin, 2020. "From “Coal to Gas” to “Coal to Biomass”: The Strategic Choice of Social Capital in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Vladimír Krepl & Husam I. Shaheen & Ghaeth Fandi & Luboš Smutka & Zdenek Muller & Josef Tlustý & Tarek Husein & Safwan Ghanem, 2020. "The Role of Renewable Energies in the Sustainable Development of Post-Crisis Electrical Power Sectors Reconstruction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-31, November.
    9. Majid Ebrahimi & Hamid Nejadsoleymani & Mohammad Reza Mansouri Daneshvar, 2019. "Land suitability map and ecological carrying capacity for the recognition of touristic zones in the Kalat region, Iran: a multi-criteria analysis based on AHP and GIS," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 697-718, October.
    10. Sun, Shulei & Ma, Chunyu & Wang, Xiyu & Yang, Ye & Mei, Jun, 2024. "Design and optimisation of a novel serpentine flow channel with branch structure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    11. Madjid Tavana & Mariya Sodenkamp & Leena Suhl, 2010. "A soft multi-criteria decision analysis model with application to the European Union enlargement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 393-421, December.
    12. Gözaçan Nazlıcan & Lafci Çisem, 2020. "Evaluation of Key Performance Indicators of Logistics Firms," Logistics, Supply Chain, Sustainability and Global Challenges, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 24-32, February.
    13. Sabina Kordana-Obuch & Michał Wojtoń & Mariusz Starzec & Beata Piotrowska, 2023. "Opportunities and Challenges for Research on Heat Recovery from Wastewater: Bibliometric and Strategic Analyses," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-36, September.
    14. Tinta, Abdoulganiour Almame, 2023. "Energy substitution in Africa: Cross-regional differentiation effects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).
    15. Javier Mendoza Jiménez & Montserrat Hernández López & Susana Eva Franco Escobar, 2019. "Sustainable Public Procurement: From Law to Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-23, November.
    16. Antonella Lomoro & Giorgio Mossa & Roberta Pellegrino & Luigi Ranieri, 2020. "Optimizing Risk Allocation in Public-Private Partnership Projects by Project Finance Contracts. The Case of Put-or-Pay Contract for Stranded Posidonia Disposal in the Municipality of Bari," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, January.
    17. Alexei Pérez-Velázquez & Leandro Leysdian Oro-Carralero & Jorge Laureano Moya-Rodríguez, 2020. "Supplier Selection for Photovoltaic Module Installation Utilizing Fuzzy Inference and the VIKOR Method: A Green Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
    18. Grošelj, Petra & Hodges, Donald G. & Zadnik Stirn, Lidija, 2016. "Participatory and multi-criteria analysis for forest (ecosystem) management: A case study of Pohorje, Slovenia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 80-86.
    19. Sepehr Ghazinoory & Mansoureh Abdi & Mandana Azadegan-Mehr, 2010. "Swot Methodology: A State-of-the-Art Review for the Past, A Framework for the Future," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 24-48, November.
    20. Pinglin He & Jing Ning & Zhongfu Yu & Hao Xiong & Huayu Shen & Hui Jin, 2019. "Can Environmental Tax Policy Really Help to Reduce Pollutant Emissions? An Empirical Study of a Panel ARDL Model Based on OECD Countries and China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-32, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03137-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.