IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elmark/v35y2025i1d10.1007_s12525-025-00770-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Navigating AI conformity: A design framework to assess fairness, explainability, and performance

Author

Listed:
  • Moritz von Zahn

    (Goethe University)

  • Jan Zacharias

    (Goethe University)

  • Maximilian Lowin

    (Goethe University)

  • Johannes Chen

    (Goethe University)

  • Oliver Hinz

    (Goethe University)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems create value but can pose substantial risks, particularly due to their black-box nature and potential bias towards certain individuals. In response, recent legal initiatives require organizations to ensure their AI systems conform to overarching principles such as explainability and fairness. However, conducting such conformity assessments poses significant challenges for organizations, including a lack of skilled experts and ambiguous guidelines. In this paper, the authors help organizations by providing a design framework for assessing the conformity of AI systems. Specifically, building upon design science research, the authors conduct expert interviews, derive design requirements and principles, instantiate the framework in an illustrative software artifact, and evaluate it in five focus group sessions. The artifact is designed to both enable a fast, semi-automated assessment of principles such as fairness and explainability and facilitate communication between AI owners and third-party stakeholders (e.g., regulators). The authors provide researchers and practitioners with insights from interviews along with design knowledge for AI conformity assessments, which may prove particularly valuable in light of upcoming regulations such as the European Union AI Act.

Suggested Citation

  • Moritz von Zahn & Jan Zacharias & Maximilian Lowin & Johannes Chen & Oliver Hinz, 2025. "Navigating AI conformity: A design framework to assess fairness, explainability, and performance," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-24, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:35:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-025-00770-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s12525-025-00770-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12525-025-00770-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12525-025-00770-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Machine learning; Algorithmic fairness; Explainable AI; Certification; AI auditing; Impact assessment;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management
    • L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:35:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-025-00770-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.