IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elmark/v33y2023i1d10.1007_s12525-023-00645-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How two leading partners learn to tango: The case of IoT-based business model co-innovation between a retailer and an electronics supplier

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Sturm

    (Technical University of Munich, Chair for Information Systems)

  • Jörg Weking

    (Technical University of Munich, Chair for Information Systems)

  • Markus Böhm

    (University of Applied Sciences Landshut)

  • Maximilian Schreieck

    (University of Innsbruck)

  • Helmut Krcmar

    (Technical University of Munich, Chair for Information Systems)

Abstract

Due to eroding business models, companies are seeking new growth opportunities. Business model innovation (BMI) can enable sustainable competitive advantage and future growth. Yet many companies are struggling to innovate their business models. Recent research reveals that collaboration concerning stakeholder integration and open business model innovation can foster BMI, but research has addressed both topics in isolation. By combining these topics, we establish business model co-innovation (BMCI) as a new perspective. Based on a longitudinal case study of an incumbent retailer and an incumbent electronics supplier, we investigate how both parties contribute to innovating the supplier’s business model. We document a BMCI process model highlighting the direct and indirect business model changes of the retailer and the supplier and we identify BMCI characteristics. We contribute to research with a new perspective on how partners co-innovate a business model.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Sturm & Jörg Weking & Markus Böhm & Maximilian Schreieck & Helmut Krcmar, 2023. "How two leading partners learn to tango: The case of IoT-based business model co-innovation between a retailer and an electronics supplier," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:33:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-023-00645-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s12525-023-00645-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12525-023-00645-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12525-023-00645-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harriman Samuel Saragih & Jacob Donald Tan, 2018. "Co-innovation: a review and conceptual framework," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(3), pages 361-377.
    2. Bohnsack, René & Pinkse, Jonatan & Kolk, Ans, 2014. "Business models for sustainable technologies: Exploring business model evolution in the case of electric vehicles," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 284-300.
    3. Dirk Schneckenberg & Vivek Velamuri & Christian Comberg, 2019. "The Design Logic of New Business Models: Unveiling Cognitive Foundations of Managerial Reasoning," Post-Print hal-02290186, HAL.
    4. B. Demil & X. Lecocq, 2010. "Business model evolution : in search of dynamic consistency," Post-Print hal-00572915, HAL.
    5. Henrik Berglund & Christian Sandström, 2013. "Business model innovation from an open systems perspective: structural challenges and managerial solutions," International Journal of Product Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(3/4), pages 274-285.
    6. Giovanni Gavetti & Jan W. Rivkin, 2007. "On the Origin of Strategy: Action and Cognition over Time," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 420-439, June.
    7. Jörg Weking & Andreas Hein & Markus Böhm & Helmut Krcmar, 2020. "A hierarchical taxonomy of business model patterns," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(3), pages 447-468, September.
    8. Sabrina Schneider & Patrick Spieth, 2013. "Business Model Innovation: Towards An Integrated Future Research Agenda," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-34.
    9. Karolin Frankenberger & Tobias Weiblen & Michaela Csik & Oliver Gassmann, 2013. "The 4I-framework of business model innovation: a structured view on process phases and challenges," International Journal of Product Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(3/4), pages 249-273.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gerrit Remane & Andre Hanelt & Jan F. Tesch & Lutz M. Kolbe, 2017. "The Business Model Pattern Database — A Tool For Systematic Business Model Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(01), pages 1-61, January.
    2. Daniela Andreini & Cristina Bettinelli & Nicolai J. Foss & Marco Mismetti, 2022. "Business model innovation: a review of the process-based literature," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 26(4), pages 1089-1121, December.
    3. Payam Hanafizadeh & Mohammad Mehrabioun & Kambiz Badie & Jahanyar Bamdad Soofi, 2018. "A Systemic Framework for Business Model Design and Development -Part A: Theorizing Perspective," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 437-461, August.
    4. Ancillai, Chiara & Sabatini, Andrea & Gatti, Marco & Perna, Andrea, 2023. "Digital technology and business model innovation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    5. Payam Hanafizadeh & Parastou Hatami & Morteza Analoui & Amir Albadvi, 2021. "Business model innovation driven by the internet of things technology, in internet service providers’ business context," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1175-1243, December.
    6. Maxime Thomas & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2017. "Why is Business Model Innovation so poorly innovative ? Uncovering the critical role of collaborative design in Business Model Innovation," Post-Print hal-01499143, HAL.
    7. Engwall, Mats & Kaulio, Matti & Karakaya, Emrah & Miterev, Maxim & Berlin, Daniel, 2021. "Experimental networks for business model innovation: A way for incumbents to navigate sustainability transitions?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    8. Jan F. Tesch & Anne-Sophie Brillinger & Dominik Bilgeri, 2017. "Internet Of Things Business Model Innovation And The Stage-Gate Process: An Exploratory Analysis," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(05), pages 1-19, June.
    9. Arash Rezazadeh & Ana Carvalho, 2018. "A value-based approach to business model innovation: Defining the elements of the concept," NIPE Working Papers 12/2018, NIPE - Universidade do Minho.
    10. Karami, Masoud & Baber, William W. & Ojala, Arto, 2022. "The effectual process of business model innovation for seizing opportunities in frontier markets," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    11. Best, Bernadette & Miller, Kristel & McAdam, Rodney & Moffett, Sandra, 2021. "Mission or margin? Using dynamic capabilities to manage tensions in social purpose organisations’ business model innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 643-657.
    12. Mark Loon & Roy Chik, 2019. "Efficiency-centered, innovation-enabling business models of high tech SMEs: Evidence from Hong Kong," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 87-111, March.
    13. Balboni, Bernardo & Bortoluzzi, Guido & Pugliese, Roberto & Tracogna, Andrea, 2019. "Business model evolution, contextual ambidexterity and the growth performance of high-tech start-ups," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 115-124.
    14. Sven M. Laudien & Birgit Daxböck, 2016. "Path dependence as a barrier to business model change in manufacturing firms: insights from a multiple-case study," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 86(6), pages 611-645, August.
    15. Emmanuelle Reuter, 2022. "Hybrid business models in the sharing economy: The role of business model design for managing the environmental paradox," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 603-618, February.
    16. Patrick Spieth & Svenja Meissner Née Schuchert, 2018. "Business Model Innovation Alliances: How To Open Business Models For Cooperation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(04), pages 1-26, May.
    17. Qinying Fang & Liwen Chen & Dalin Zeng & Lin Zhang, 2019. "Drivers of Professional Service Model Innovation in the Chinese Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, February.
    18. Alexis Laszczuk & Lionel Garreau & Bernard de Montmorillon, 2017. "Understanding emergence in business model development: how companies interact with stakeholders to deal with environmental ambiguity," Post-Print hal-01787276, HAL.
    19. René Bohnsack & Francesca Ciulli & Ans Kolk, 2021. "The role of business models in firm internationalization: An exploration of European electricity firms in the context of the energy transition," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(5), pages 824-852, July.
    20. Palo, Teea & Åkesson, Maria & Löfberg, Nina, 2019. "Servitization as business model contestation: A practice approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 486-496.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Business model innovation; Internet of Things; Innovation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:33:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-023-00645-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.