IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elmark/v27y2017i4d10.1007_s12525-017-0255-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Customer lifetime network value: customer valuation in the context of network effects

Author

Listed:
  • Miriam Däs

    (University of Regensburg)

  • Julia Klier

    (University of Regensburg)

  • Mathias Klier

    (University of Ulm)

  • Georg Lindner

    (University of Regensburg)

  • Lea Thiel

    (University of Regensburg)

Abstract

Nowadays customers are increasingly connected and extensively interact with each other using technology-enabled media like online social networks. Hence, customers are frequently exposed to social influence when making purchase decisions. However, established approaches for customer valuation mostly neglect network effects based on social influence. This leads to a misallocation of resources. Following a design-oriented approach, this paper develops a model for customer valuation referred to as the customer lifetime network value (CLNV) incorporating an integrated network perspective. By considering the customers’ net contribution to the network, the CLNV reallocates values between customers based on social influence. Inspired by common prestige- and eigenvector-related centrality measures it incorporates social influence among all degrees of separation acknowledging its viral spread. Using a real-world dataset, we demonstrate the practicable applicability of the CLNV to determine individual customers’ value.

Suggested Citation

  • Miriam Däs & Julia Klier & Mathias Klier & Georg Lindner & Lea Thiel, 2017. "Customer lifetime network value: customer valuation in the context of network effects," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 27(4), pages 307-328, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:27:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s12525-017-0255-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s12525-017-0255-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12525-017-0255-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12525-017-0255-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. V. Kumar & Rajkumar Venkatesan & Tim Bohling & Denise Beckmann, 2008. "—The Power of CLV: Managing Customer Lifetime Value at IBM," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 585-599, 07-08.
    2. Raghuram Iyengar & Christophe Van den Bulte & Thomas W. Valente, 2011. "Opinion Leadership and Social Contagion in New Product Diffusion," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 195-212, 03-04.
    3. Dipak C. Jain & Naufel J. Vilcassim, 1991. "Investigating Household Purchase Timing Decisions: A Conditional Hazard Function Approach," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 1-23.
    4. Anonymous, 2014. "Introduction to the Issue," Journal of Wine Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(1), pages 1-2, May.
    5. Kristine de Valck & Gerrit H. van Bruggen & Berendt Wierenga, 2009. "Virtual communities: A marketing perspective," Post-Print hal-00458421, HAL.
    6. Herr, Paul M & Kardes, Frank R & Kim, John, 1991. "Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 17(4), pages 454-462, March.
    7. Kristiaan Helsen & David C. Schmittlein, 1993. "Analyzing Duration Times in Marketing: Evidence for the Effectiveness of Hazard Rate Models," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 395-414.
    8. Scarpi, Daniele & Pizzi, Gabriele & Visentin, Marco, 2014. "Shopping for fun or shopping to buy: Is it different online and offline?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 258-267.
    9. Stefan Stieglitz & Linh Dang-Xuan & Axel Bruns & Christoph Neuberger, 2014. "Social Media Analytics," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 6(2), pages 89-96, April.
    10. Verhoef, Peter C. & Lemon, Katherine N., 2013. "Successful customer value management: Key lessons and emerging trends," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 1-15.
    11. Hinz, Oliver & Schulze, Christian & Takac, Carsten, 2014. "New product adoption in social networks: Why direction matters," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 2836-2844.
    12. Hinz, Oliver & Skiera, Bernd & Barrot, Christian & Becker, Jan, 2011. "Seeding Strategies for Viral Marketing: An Empirical Comparison," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 56543, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    13. Bettina Lis & Christian Neßler, 2014. "Electronic Word of Mouth," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 6(1), pages 63-65, February.
    14. Yubo Chen & Jinhong Xie, 2008. "Online Consumer Review: Word-of-Mouth as a New Element of Marketing Communication Mix," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 477-491, March.
    15. Michael L. Katz & Carl Shapiro, 1994. "Systems Competition and Network Effects," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 8(2), pages 93-115, Spring.
    16. Hogan, John E. & Lemon, Katherine N. & Libai, Barak, 2004. "Quantifying the Ripple: Word-of-Mouth and Advertising Effectiveness," Journal of Advertising Research, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(3), pages 271-280, September.
    17. Anonymous, 2014. "Introduction to the Issue," Journal of Wine Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 109-110, August.
    18. Florian Probst & Laura Grosswiele & Regina Pfleger, 2013. "Who will lead and who will follow: Identifying Influential Users in Online Social Networks," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 5(3), pages 179-193, June.
    19. Mauro Bampo & Michael T. Ewing & Dineli R. Mather & David Stewart & Mark Wallace, 2008. "The Effects of the Social Structure of Digital Networks on Viral Marketing Performance," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 273-290, September.
    20. Malthouse, Edward C. & Haenlein, Michael & Skiera, Bernd & Wege, Egbert & Zhang, Michael, 2013. "Managing Customer Relationships in the Social Media Era: Introducing the Social CRM House," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 270-280.
    21. Leo Katz, 1953. "A new status index derived from sociometric analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 18(1), pages 39-43, March.
    22. Robert M. Bond & Christopher J. Fariss & Jason J. Jones & Adam D. I. Kramer & Cameron Marlow & Jaime E. Settle & James H. Fowler, 2012. "A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization," Nature, Nature, vol. 489(7415), pages 295-298, September.
    23. Duncan J. Watts & Peter Sheridan Dodds, 2007. "Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(4), pages 441-458, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rainer Alt, 2017. "Electronic markets on transaction costs," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 27(4), pages 297-301, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jansen, Nora & Hinz, Oliver, 2022. "Inferring opinion leadership from digital footprints," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1123-1137.
    2. Florian Probst & Laura Grosswiele & Regina Pfleger, 2013. "Who will lead and who will follow: Identifying Influential Users in Online Social Networks," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 5(3), pages 179-193, June.
    3. Hinz, Oliver & Schulze, Christian & Takac, Carsten, 2014. "New product adoption in social networks: Why direction matters," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 2836-2844.
    4. Sarah Gelper & Ralf van der Lans & Gerrit van Bruggen, 2021. "Competition for Attention in Online Social Networks: Implications for Seeding Strategies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(2), pages 1026-1047, February.
    5. Pescher, Christian & Reichhart, Philipp & Spann, Martin, 2014. "Consumer Decision-making Processes in Mobile Viral Marketing Campaigns," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 43-54.
    6. Yansong Hu & Christophe Van den Bulte, 2014. "Nonmonotonic Status Effects in New Product Adoption," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 509-533, July.
    7. Sheikhahmadi, Amir & Nematbakhsh, Mohammad Ali & Shokrollahi, Arman, 2015. "Improving detection of influential nodes in complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 436(C), pages 833-845.
    8. Meyners, Jannik & Barrot, Christian & Becker, Jan U. & Bodapati, Anand V., 2017. "Reward-scrounging in customer referral programs," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 382-398.
    9. Wang, Feng & Zhang, Xueting & Chen, Man & Zeng, Wei & Cao, Rong, 2022. "The influential paradox: Brand and deal content sharing by influencers in friendship networks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 503-514.
    10. Kick, Markus, 2015. "Social Media Research: A Narrative Review," EconStor Preprints 182506, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    11. Gensler, Sonja & Völckner, Franziska & Liu-Thompkins, Yuping & Wiertz, Caroline, 2013. "Managing Brands in the Social Media Environment," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 242-256.
    12. Nejad, Mohammad G. & Amini, Mehdi & Sherrell, Daniel L., 2016. "The profit impact of revenue heterogeneity and assortativity in the presence of negative word-of-mouth," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 656-673.
    13. Muller, Eitan & Peres, Renana, 2019. "The effect of social networks structure on innovation performance: A review and directions for research," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 3-19.
    14. Sinan Aral & Dylan Walker, 2014. "Tie Strength, Embeddedness, and Social Influence: A Large-Scale Networked Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1352-1370, June.
    15. Thomas Chesney, 2017. "The Cascade Capacity Predicts Individuals to Seed for Diffusion Through Social Networks," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 51-61, January.
    16. Inyoung Chae & Andrew T. Stephen & Yakov Bart & Dai Yao, 2017. "Spillover Effects in Seeded Word-of-Mouth Marketing Campaigns," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(1), pages 89-104, January.
    17. Tolga Akcura & Kemal Altinkemer & Hailiang Chen, 0. "Noninfluentials and information dissemination in the microblogging community," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-18.
    18. Tolga Akcura & Kemal Altinkemer & Hailiang Chen, 2018. "Noninfluentials and information dissemination in the microblogging community," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 89-106, June.
    19. Pescher, Christian & Spann, Martin, 2014. "Relevance of actors in bridging positions for product-related information diffusion," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(8), pages 1630-1637.
    20. Nejad, Mohammad G. & Amini, Mehdi & Babakus, Emin, 2015. "Success Factors in Product Seeding: The Role of Homophily," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 68-88.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Customer valuation; Customer lifetime value; Social influence; Network effects;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:27:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s12525-017-0255-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.