IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elcore/v25y2025i3d10.1007_s10660-023-09752-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of explained actions and reactions in the helpfulness of online reviews

Author

Listed:
  • Mengmeng Zhan

    (Wuhan University)

  • Liping Liu

    (Nanjing Normal University)

  • Xiaoxue Wang

    (Nanjing Normal University)

  • Ran Ju

    (The Ohio State University)

Abstract

Online review helpfulness has been a hot topic of discussion among academics and practitioners. The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of the two types of explanation content, explained actions and explained reactions, on online review helpfulness, along with the moderating effects of product type and sentiment polarity. We developed and empirically examined the proposed hypotheses with data collected from 57,491 product reviews and 415 experimental participants. The word-of-bag was used for measuring the explanation content (explained actions and explained reactions), and negative binomial regression results showed that both explained actions and explained reactions in the reviews have positive effects on review helpfulness. The main results were further verified by three experiments with strict controls. The current study could help online retailers identify the most helpful review, thereby reducing consumer search costs and helping reviewers contribute more valuable online reviews.

Suggested Citation

  • Mengmeng Zhan & Liping Liu & Xiaoxue Wang & Ran Ju, 2025. "The role of explained actions and reactions in the helpfulness of online reviews," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 2067-2096, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:25:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10660-023-09752-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10660-023-09752-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10660-023-09752-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10660-023-09752-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:25:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10660-023-09752-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.