IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/manmar/v20y2025i2p81-92n1005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decoding hotel reviewers: Insights from a decision tree analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Llorens-Marin Miguel

    (Department of Marketing, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain)

  • Hernandez Adolfo

    (Department of Financial and Actuarial Economics and Statistics, Faculty of Commerce and Tourism, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain)

  • Puelles-Gallo Maria

    (Department of Marketing, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

With the rise of user-generated content, understanding travelers’ propensity to share hotel experiences online has become a critical research area in tourism and hospitality management. This study examines factors influencing travelers’ likelihood of writing hotel reviews, with a particular focus on the role of different online platforms and sociodemographic characteristics. While previous research has explored general motivations for online review writing, little is known about how specific platforms influence review contributions. To address this gap, we conducted an online survey with 739 travelers and applied a machine learning (ML) technique – decision trees (DTs) – to classify customers based on their likelihood to write reviews. This approach allowed us to model non-linear relationships while ensuring interpretability for marketing practitioners. Our findings reveal that frequent use of Facebook for hotel searches, combined with being employed, is the strongest predictor of review-writing behavior, highlighting the role of social media engagement. However, limitations such as non-probability sampling and the omission of certain variables may impact generalizability. This study contributes to the literature by examining the link between platform usage and review-writing behavior, an area that has received limited attention. By employing DTs, a transparent ML approach, our findings offer actionable insights for hotel managers, helping them identify and engage potential reviewers more effectively. Understanding how platform engagement influences review behavior can enhance marketing strategies, encourage review generation, and ultimately shape consumer decision-making in the hospitality industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Llorens-Marin Miguel & Hernandez Adolfo & Puelles-Gallo Maria, 2025. "Decoding hotel reviewers: Insights from a decision tree analysis," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 20(2), pages 81-92.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:manmar:v:20:y:2025:i:2:p:81-92:n:1005
    DOI: 10.2478/mmcks-2025-0010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2025-0010
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/mmcks-2025-0010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guo, Yue & Barnes, Stuart J. & Jia, Qiong, 2017. "Mining meaning from online ratings and reviews: Tourist satisfaction analysis using latent dirichlet allocation," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 467-483.
    2. Vermeer, Susan A.M. & Araujo, Theo & Bernritter, Stefan F. & van Noort, Guda, 2019. "Seeing the wood for the trees: How machine learning can help firms in identifying relevant electronic word-of-mouth in social media," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 492-508.
    3. R. Filieri & Elisabetta Raguseo & Claudio Vitari, 2019. "What moderates the influence of extremely negative ratings? The role of review and reviewer characteristics," Post-Print hal-04779104, HAL.
    4. Rosado-Cubero, Ana & Freire-Rubio, Teresa & Hernández, Adolfo, 2022. "Entrepreneurship: What matters most," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 250-263.
    5. G. V. Kass, 1980. "An Exploratory Technique for Investigating Large Quantities of Categorical Data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 29(2), pages 119-127, June.
    6. Stefan Gössling & Harald Zeiss & C. Michael Hall & Carlos Martin-Rios & Yael Ram & Ivar-Petter Grøtte, 2019. "A cross-country comparison of accommodation manager perspectives on online review manipulation," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(14), pages 1744-1763, August.
    7. Raffaele Filieri & Elisabetta Raguseo & Claudio Vitari, 2019. "What moderates the influence of extremely negative ratings? The role of review and reviewer characteristics," Post-Print hal-03511270, HAL.
    8. Yi Liu & Shuo Yang & Miaochao Chen, 2022. "Application of Decision Tree-Based Classification Algorithm on Content Marketing," Journal of Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-10, March.
    9. Eunil Park & Jiwon Kang & Daejin Choi & Jinyoung Han, 2020. "Understanding customers' hotel revisiting behaviour: a sentiment analysis of online feedback reviews," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5), pages 605-611, March.
    10. Wang, Xia & Yu, Chunling & Wei, Yujie, 2012. "Social Media Peer Communication and Impacts on Purchase Intentions: A Consumer Socialization Framework," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 198-208.
    11. Chen-Yuan Chen & Tsung-Hao Chen & Ying-Hsiu Chen & Chieh-Lian Chen & Shang-En Yu, 2013. "The spatio-temporal distribution of different types of messages and personality traits affecting the eWOM of Facebook," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 65(3), pages 2077-2103, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mariani, Marcello M. & Borghi, Matteo & Laker, Benjamin, 2023. "Do submission devices influence online review ratings differently across different types of platforms? A big data analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    2. Jakub Kubiczek & Bartłomiej Hadasik & Dominika Krawczyńska & Kornelia Przedworska & Erika Zsuzsanna Madarász & Aleksandra Ryczko, 2024. "Perspective of Created Value in Consumer Choice: Comparison of Economic and Ecological Dimensions," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(1), pages 21582440241, March.
    3. Colmekcioglu, Nazan & Marvi, Reza & Foroudi, Pantea & Okumus, Fevzi, 2022. "Generation, susceptibility, and response regarding negativity: An in-depth analysis on negative online reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 235-250.
    4. R. Filieri & E. Raguseo & F. Galati, 2023. "Negative signals on Peer-to-Peer platforms: The impact of cancellations on host performance across different property types," Post-Print hal-04779130, HAL.
    5. Mengmeng Zhan & Liping Liu & Xiaoxue Wang & Ran Ju, 2025. "The role of explained actions and reactions in the helpfulness of online reviews," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 2067-2096, June.
    6. Hai-Anh Tran & Yuliya Strizhakova & Bach Nguyen & Samuel G. B. Johnson, 2025. "Expressions of customer rumination in online posts and firm responses," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 825-853, May.
    7. Xiaozhong Lyu & Cuiqing Jiang & Yong Ding & Zhao Wang & Yao Liu, 2019. "Sales Prediction by Integrating the Heat and Sentiments of Product Dimensions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, February.
    8. Strobl, Carolin & Boulesteix, Anne-Laure & Augustin, Thomas, 2007. "Unbiased split selection for classification trees based on the Gini Index," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 483-501, September.
    9. Hussain, Hadia & Murtaza, Murtaza & Ajmal, Areeb & Ahmed, Afreen & Khan, Muhammad Ovais Khalid, 2020. "A study on the effects of social media advertisement on consumer’s attitude and customer response," MPRA Paper 104675, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Wang, Binni & Wang, Pong & Tu, Yiliu, 2021. "Customer satisfaction service match and service quality-based blockchain cloud manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    11. Wang, Le & Luo, Xin (Robert) & Li, Han, 2022. "Envy or conformity? An empirical investigation of peer influence on the purchase of non-functional items in mobile free-to-play games," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 308-324.
    12. M. Narciso, 2022. "The Unreliability of Online Review Mechanisms," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 349-368, September.
    13. I. Albarrán & P. Alonso-González & J. M. Marin, 2017. "Some criticism to a general model in Solvency II: an explanation from a clustering point of view," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1289-1308, June.
    14. Yousaf Muhammad & Dey Sandeep Kumar, 2022. "Best proxy to determine firm performance using financial ratios: A CHAID approach," Review of Economic Perspectives, Sciendo, vol. 22(3), pages 219-239, September.
    15. Jiacong Wu & Yu Wang & Ru Zhang & Jing Cai, 2018. "An Approach to Discovering Product/Service Improvement Priorities: Using Dynamic Importance-Performance Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-26, October.
    16. Shuyue Huang & Lena Jingen Liang & Hwansuk Chris Choi, 2022. "How We Failed in Context: A Text-Mining Approach to Understanding Hotel Service Failures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    17. repec:cup:judgdm:v:16:y:2021:i:6:p:1413-1438 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. repec:plo:pone00:0193873 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Archana R. Panhalkar & Dharmpal D. Doye, 2020. "An approach of improving decision tree classifier using condensed informative data," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 47(4), pages 431-445, December.
    20. Carmela Iorio & Giuseppe Pandolfo & Antonio D’Ambrosio & Roberta Siciliano, 2020. "Mining big data in tourism," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(5), pages 1655-1669, December.
    21. Mohamed M. Mostafa, 2023. "A one-hundred-year structural topic modeling analysis of the knowledge structure of international management research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3905-3935, August.
    22. Ian Sutherland & Kiattipoom Kiatkawsin, 2020. "Determinants of Guest Experience in Airbnb: A Topic Modeling Approach Using LDA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:manmar:v:20:y:2025:i:2:p:81-92:n:1005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.