IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elcore/v22y2022i3d10.1007_s10660-020-09444-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Inconsistent Corruption Control through E-government Participation: Updated Evidence from a Cross-Country Investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Lihua Wang

    (Xi’an Jiaotong University)

  • Xin(Robert) Luo

    (University of New Mexico)

  • M. Peter Jurkat

    (University of New Mexico)

Abstract

Based on data from 133 countries, this paper unveils and empirically proves a nonlinear relationship between e-participation and corruption control and further examines the moderating roles of voice and accountability and ICT infrastructure. The empirical analysis suggests that (1) e-participation has a curvilinear (U-shaped) relationship with corruption control; (2) voice and accountability negatively moderate the relationship between e-participation and corruption control; (3) ICT infrastructure positively moderates the relationship between e-participation and corruption control. Our findings identify the relationships among e-participation, voice and accountability, ICT infrastructure, and corruption control, and provide implications for combating corruption in implementing e-participation initiatives for e-government.

Suggested Citation

  • Lihua Wang & Xin(Robert) Luo & M. Peter Jurkat, 2022. "Understanding Inconsistent Corruption Control through E-government Participation: Updated Evidence from a Cross-Country Investigation," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 979-1006, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:22:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10660-020-09444-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10660-020-09444-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10660-020-09444-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10660-020-09444-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David J. TEECE, 2008. "Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: The Transfer And Licensing Of Know-How And Intellectual Property Understanding the Multinational Enterprise in the Modern World, chapter 5, pages 67-87, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Anastasiia Shukhova & Yulii Nisnevich, 2017. "Measurement of Validity of Corruption Indices," HSE Working papers WP BRP 42/PS/2017, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    3. Chon-Kyun Kim, 2014. "Anti-Corruption Initiatives and E-Government: A Cross-National Study," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 385-396, September.
    4. R. Pathak & Gurmeet Singh & Rakesh Belwal & R. Smith, 2007. "E-governance and Corruption-developments and Issues in Ethiopia," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 195-208, September.
    5. Rose-Ackerman,Susan & Palifka,Bonnie J., 2016. "Corruption and Government," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107441095.
    6. Habib, M. & Zurawicki, L., 2001. "Country-level investments and the effect of corruption -- some empirical evidence," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 10(6), pages 687-700, December.
    7. Dyah Setyaningrum, 2017. "E-Government as an Anti-Corruption Tool: Experience from Indonesia," GATR Journals afr149, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    8. Lance Eliot Brouthers & Yan Gao & Jason Patrick McNicol, 2008. "Corruption and market attractiveness influences on different types of FDI," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 673-680, June.
    9. Kevin Zheng Zhou & Fang Wu, 2010. "Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 547-561, May.
    10. Mehmet Bac, 2001. "Corruption, Connections and Transparency: Does a Better Screen Imply a Better Scene?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 107(1), pages 87-96, April.
    11. Sonia Royo & Ana Yetano & Basilio Acerete, 2014. "Perceptions About the Effectiveness of E-Participation: A Multistakeholder Perspective," Public Administration and Information Technology, in: Manuel Pedro Rodríguez-Bolívar (ed.), Measuring E-government Efficiency, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 257-275, Springer.
    12. Anne Marie Goetz & Rob Jenkins, 2001. "Hybrid Forms Of Accountability: Citizen engagement in institutions of public-sector oversight in India," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 363-383, September.
    13. Yueping Zheng, 2016. "The impact of E-participation on corruption: a cross-country analysis," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 91-103, April.
    14. Satish Krishnan & Thompson S.H. Teo, 2012. "Moderating effects of governance on information infrastructure and e‐government development," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(10), pages 1929-1946, October.
    15. Krishnan, Satish & Teo, Thompson S.H. & Lymm, John, 2017. "Determinants of electronic participation and electronic government maturity: Insights from cross-country data," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 297-312.
    16. Rose-Ackerman,Susan & Palifka,Bonnie J., 2016. "Corruption and Government," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107081208.
    17. Nasr G. Elbahnasawy & Charles F. Revier, 2012. "The Determinants of Corruption: Cross-Country-Panel-Data Analysis," The Developing Economies, Institute of Developing Economies, vol. 50(4), pages 311-333, December.
    18. Elbahnasawy, Nasr G., 2014. "E-Government, Internet Adoption, and Corruption: An Empirical Investigation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 114-126.
    19. Peerayuth Charoensukmongkol & Murad Moqbel, 2014. "Does Investment in ICT Curb or Create More Corruption? A Cross-Country Analysis," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 51-63, March.
    20. Satish Krishnan & Thompson S.H. Teo, 2012. "Moderating effects of governance on information infrastructure and e-government development," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(10), pages 1929-1946, October.
    21. Arvind K. Jain, 2001. "Corruption: A Review," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(1), pages 71-121, February.
    22. Ned Kock & Lebrian Gaskins, 2014. "The Mediating Role of Voice and Accountability in the Relationship Between Internet Diffusion and Government Corruption in Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 23-43, January.
    23. Andersen, Thomas Barnebeck, 2009. "E-Government as an anti-corruption strategy," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 201-210, August.
    24. Cassandra E DiRienzo & Jayoti Das & Kathryn T Cort & John Burbridge, 2007. "Corruption and the role of information," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 38(2), pages 320-332, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khan, Anupriya & Krishnan, Satish & Dhir, Amandeep, 2021. "Electronic government and corruption: Systematic literature review, framework, and agenda for future research," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Romero-Martínez, Ana M. & García-Muiña, Fernando E., 2021. "Digitalization level, corruptive practices, and location choice in the hotel industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 176-185.
    3. Adam, Isabelle & Fazekas, Mihály, 2021. "Are emerging technologies helping win the fight against corruption? A review of the state of evidence," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    4. Adam, Ibrahim Osman, 2020. "Examining E-Government development effects on corruption in Africa: The mediating effects of ICT development and institutional quality," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    5. Jiménez, Alfredo & Hanoteau, Julien & Barkemeyer, Ralf, 2022. "E-procurement and firm corruption to secure public contracts: The moderating role of governance institutions and supranational support," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 640-650.
    6. Malik Shahzad Shabbir & Hummera Saleem & Muhammad Bilal Khan, 2021. "Impact of Internet Adoption and Mobile Phone Penetration on Corruption: Evidence from Selected Asia-Paciï¬ c Countries," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 22(4), pages 906-920, August.
    7. Khan, Anupriya & Krishnan, Satish, 2019. "Conceptualizing the impact of corruption in national institutions and national stakeholder service systems on e-government maturity," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 23-36.
    8. Kanyam, Daniel A. & Kostandini, Genti & Ferreira, Susana, 2017. "The Mobile Phone Revolution: Have Mobile Phones and the Internet Reduced Corruption in Sub-Saharan Africa?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 271-284.
    9. Eugen Dimant & Guglielmo Tosato, 2018. "Causes And Effects Of Corruption: What Has Past Decade'S Empirical Research Taught Us? A Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 335-356, April.
    10. Ali Acaravci & Seyfettin Artan & Pinar Hayaloglu & Sinan Erdogan, 2023. "Economic and Institutional Determinants of Corruption: The Case of Developed and Developing Countries," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 47(1), pages 207-231, March.
    11. Krishnan, Satish & Teo, Thompson S.H. & Lymm, John, 2017. "Determinants of electronic participation and electronic government maturity: Insights from cross-country data," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 297-312.
    12. Veronika Linhartová, 2019. "Curbing Corruption in the Public Sector by Utilizing Electronic Public Administration," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 67(4), pages 1039-1048.
    13. Jha, Chandan Kumar & Sarangi, Sudipta, 2017. "Does social media reduce corruption?," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 60-71.
    14. Tofail Alam & Muhammad Aftab & Zaheer Abbas & Kamoliddin Mannonov Murodjon Ugli & Syed Asad Abbas Bokhari, 2023. "Impact of E-Government Initiatives to Combat Corruption Mediating by Behavioral Intention: A Quantitative Analysis from Emerging Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, February.
    15. Peerayuth Charoensukmongkol & Murad Moqbel, 2014. "Does Investment in ICT Curb or Create More Corruption? A Cross-Country Analysis," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 51-63, March.
    16. Lucio Cappelli & Antonella Pisano & Enrica Iannucci & Patrizia Papetti & Fabrizio D'Ascenzo & Roberto Ruggieri, 2024. "Digitalization and prevention of corruption: Opportunities and risks—Some evidence from the Italian university system," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 81-94, January.
    17. Fan, Qingji & Kuper, Paul & Choi, Yun Hyeong & Choi, Seong-jin, 2021. "Does ICT development curb firms’ perceived corruption pressure? The contingent impact of institutional qualities and competitive conditions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 496-507.
    18. Stratu-Strelet, Doina & Gil-Gómez, Hermenegildo & Oltra-Badenes, Raúl & Oltra-Gutierrez, Juan Vicente, 2023. "Developing a theory of full democratic consolidation: Exploring the links between democracy and digital transformation in developing eastern European countries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    19. Polk Andreas, 2020. "What do we Know About Lobbying in Germany?," Review of Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 71(1), pages 43-79, April.
    20. Gans-Morse, Jordan & Borges, Mariana & Makarin, Alexey & Mannah-Blankson, Theresa & Nickow, Andre & Zhang, Dong, 2018. "Reducing bureaucratic corruption: Interdisciplinary perspectives on what works," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 171-188.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:22:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10660-020-09444-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.