IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/climat/v178y2025i4d10.1007_s10584-025-03908-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Surface temperature and ozone responses to the 2030 Global Methane Pledge

Author

Listed:
  • Evgeniya Predybaylo

    (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
    Max Planck Institute for Chemistry)

  • Jos Lelieveld

    (Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
    Cyprus Institute)

  • Andrea Pozzer

    (Max Planck Institute for Chemistry)

  • Sergey Gromov

    (Max Planck Institute for Chemistry)

  • Peter Zimmermann

    (Max Planck Institute for Chemistry)

  • Sergey Osipov

    (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
    Max Planck Institute for Chemistry)

  • Klaus Klingmüller

    (Max Planck Institute for Chemistry)

  • Benedikt Steil

    (Max Planck Institute for Chemistry)

  • Georgiy Stenchikov

    (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology)

  • Matthew McCabe

    (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

The emissions of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) continue to rise, and the effects of global warming are becoming increasingly evident. While efforts to mitigate climate change generally focus on CO2, reducing methane emissions is considered a particularly effective approach to moderate global warming in the coming decades because methane has a shorter atmospheric lifetime. The Global Methane Pledge (GMP), announced in September 2021, urges countries to reduce anthropogenic methane emissions by 30% (relative to 2020 levels) by 2030, aiming to prevent an estimated 0.2 °C global temperature increase. This could buy time to curb the growth of atmospheric CO2 concentrations. However, there is doubt regarding the ability to fulfil the GMP in time, and its impact on the atmosphere and climate is uncertain. We used an Earth system model with a mixed-layer ocean and interactive atmospheric chemistry, driven by temporally changing methane emissions, to explore future climate and air quality responses to different methane reduction strategies. We find reducing methane emissions decelerates global warming through changes in radiative fluxes and shortening the lifetime of tropospheric methane and other gases. A coincident air quality improvement is expected from a reduction of ozone near the surface. Our model results indicate that the full climate response to reduced methane emissions has a lag of two to three decades, indicating the urgency of implementing the GMP. While further measures will be required to reach the goals of the Paris Agreement and avoid irreversible climate change, achieving the GMP would provide significant progress toward global decarbonization efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Evgeniya Predybaylo & Jos Lelieveld & Andrea Pozzer & Sergey Gromov & Peter Zimmermann & Sergey Osipov & Klaus Klingmüller & Benedikt Steil & Georgiy Stenchikov & Matthew McCabe, 2025. "Surface temperature and ozone responses to the 2030 Global Methane Pledge," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 178(4), pages 1-18, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:178:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s10584-025-03908-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10584-025-03908-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-025-03908-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10584-025-03908-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhen Zhang & Benjamin Poulter & Andrew F. Feldman & Qing Ying & Philippe Ciais & Shushi Peng & Xin Li, 2023. "Recent intensification of wetland methane feedback," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 13(5), pages 430-433, May.
    2. Junichi Fujino, Rajesh Nair, Mikiko Kainuma, Toshihiko Masui and Yuzuru Matsuoka, 2006. "Multi-gas Mitigation Analysis on Stabilization Scenarios Using Aim Global Model," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I), pages 343-354.
    3. Junichi Fujino & Rajesh Nair & Mikiko Kainuma & Toshihiko Masui & Yuzuru Matsuoka, 2006. "Multi-gas Mitigation Analysis on Stabilization Scenarios Using Aim Global Model," The Energy Journal, , vol. 27(3_suppl), pages 343-354, December.
    4. Detlef Vuuren & James Edmonds & Mikiko Kainuma & Keywan Riahi & John Weyant, 2011. "A special issue on the RCPs," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 109(1), pages 1-4, November.
    5. Joeri Rogelj & Alexander Popp & Katherine V. Calvin & Gunnar Luderer & Johannes Emmerling & David Gernaat & Shinichiro Fujimori & Jessica Strefler & Tomoko Hasegawa & Giacomo Marangoni & Volker Krey &, 2018. "Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(4), pages 325-332, April.
    6. Norman Rößger & Torsten Sachs & Christian Wille & Julia Boike & Lars Kutzbach, 2022. "Seasonal increase of methane emissions linked to warming in Siberian tundra," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 12(11), pages 1031-1036, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qian, Yuan & Scherer, Laura & Tukker, Arnold & Behrens, Paul, 2020. "China's potential SO2 emissions from coal by 2050," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    2. Julien Lefevre, 2018. "Modeling the Socioeconomic Impacts of the Adoption of a Carbon Pricing Instrument – Literature review," CIRED Working Papers hal-03128619, HAL.
    3. Chao Wang & Chuyan Shan & Lidong Wang, 2024. "Stranded Asset Impairment Estimates of Thermal Power Companies Under Low-Carbon Transition Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-14, October.
    4. Coppens, Léo & Venmans, Frank, 2025. "The welfare properties of climate targets," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    5. Kate Dooley & Ellycia Harrould‐Kolieb & Anita Talberg, 2021. "Carbon‐dioxide Removal and Biodiversity: A Threat Identification Framework," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(S1), pages 34-44, April.
    6. Elke Stehfest & Willem-Jan Zeist & Hugo Valin & Petr Havlik & Alexander Popp & Page Kyle & Andrzej Tabeau & Daniel Mason-D’Croz & Tomoko Hasegawa & Benjamin L. Bodirsky & Katherine Calvin & Jonathan C, 2019. "Key determinants of global land-use projections," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Chepeliev, Maksym & Diachuk, Oleksandr & Podolets, Roman & Trypolska, Galyna, 2021. "The role of bioenergy in Ukraine's climate mitigation policy by 2050," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    8. Ángel Galán-Martín & Daniel Vázquez & Selene Cobo & Niall Dowell & José Antonio Caballero & Gonzalo Guillén-Gosálbez, 2021. "Delaying carbon dioxide removal in the European Union puts climate targets at risk," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Müller-Hansen, Finn & Lee, Yuan Ting & Callaghan, Max & Jankin, Slava & Minx, Jan C., 2022. "The German coal debate on Twitter: Reactions to a corporate policy process," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    10. Bergholt, Drago & Røisland, Øistein & Sveen, Tommy & Torvik, Ragnar, 2023. "Monetary policy when export revenues drop," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    11. Merheb, Caroline, 2024. "Why should imminent international funds for solar photovoltaics go to families and the private sector and not to the government to stop the electricity crisis in Lebanon?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    12. Yang Ou & Christopher Roney & Jameel Alsalam & Katherine Calvin & Jared Creason & Jae Edmonds & Allen A. Fawcett & Page Kyle & Kanishka Narayan & Patrick O’Rourke & Pralit Patel & Shaun Ragnauth & Ste, 2021. "Deep mitigation of CO2 and non-CO2 greenhouse gases toward 1.5 °C and 2 °C futures," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
    13. Dan Tong & David J. Farnham & Lei Duan & Qiang Zhang & Nathan S. Lewis & Ken Caldeira & Steven J. Davis, 2021. "Geophysical constraints on the reliability of solar and wind power worldwide," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    14. Fan, Dian & Chen, Shaoqing, 2024. "No pain, no gain? Simulation of carbon reduction potential and socioeconomic effects of voluntary carbon trading in China during 2021–2060," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 375(C).
    15. Michael P. Cameron, 2017. "Climate Change, Internal Migration and the Future Spatial Distribution of Population: A Case Study of New Zealand," Working Papers in Economics 17/03, University of Waikato.
    16. Panagiotis Fragkos, 2022. "Decarbonizing the International Shipping and Aviation Sectors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-25, December.
    17. Iñigo Capellán-Pérez & David Álvarez-Antelo & Luis J. Miguel, 2019. "Global Sustainability Crossroads : A Participatory Simulation Game to Educate in the Energy and Sustainability Challenges of the 21st Century," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-23, July.
    18. Heyen, Daniel & Tavoni, Alessandro, 2024. "Strategic dimensions of solar geoengineering: Economic theory and experiments," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    19. Oluwatoyin J. Gbadeyan & Joseph Muthivhi & Linda Z. Linganiso & Nirmala Deenadayalu, 2024. "Decoupling Economic Growth from Carbon Emissions: A Transition toward Low-Carbon Energy Systems—A Critical Review," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-38, August.
    20. N. Badullovich & J. Kotcher & T. A. Myers & S. A. Rosenthal & A. Leiserowitz & E. Maibach, 2025. "Understanding six “key truths” about climate change predicts policy support, discussion, and political advocacy," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 178(5), pages 1-23, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:178:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s10584-025-03908-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.