IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aqjoor/v21y2023i4d10.1007_s10288-023-00532-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Time-locked free trial strategy in duopoly markets with switching costs

Author

Listed:
  • Haiping Wang

    (Beijing Institute of Technology)

  • Jun Lin

    (Xi’an Jiaotong University)

  • Lun Ran

    (Beijing Institute of Technology)

Abstract

Offering time-locked free trials is a common strategy in the software industry. Pioneering studies have mainly focused on time-locked free trial strategies in monopoly markets, and acknowledged that an overall positive effect on consumers’ WTP is a prerequisite for offering free trials. However, software markets are often competitive, and consumers typically follow a Bayesian learning principle. We develop a game-theoretic model to examine time-locked free trial strategies in duopoly markets with switching costs. The results show that, in the markets with small switching costs, firms pursue opposite free trial strategies when the horizontal difference between products is small, and neither offers otherwise. If the switching costs are larger than a threshold, then both firms offer free trials when the horizontal difference between products is moderate. We further demonstrate that in the presence of functionality heterogeneity between products, firms are unable to reach an equilibrium in some specific cases, and more likely to take opposite free trial strategies in equilibrium. Moreover, if the firms do choose opposite strategies, interestingly, the firm with superior product does not offer free trials when switching costs are low, and is more willing to offer as switching costs increase. Our results are robust to the inclusion of other factors in the model, such as the possibility of consumers trying only one product, correlated consumer learning across different products, consumer heterogeneity in usage time, and network effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Haiping Wang & Jun Lin & Lun Ran, 2023. "Time-locked free trial strategy in duopoly markets with switching costs," 4OR, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 639-681, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:aqjoor:v:21:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s10288-023-00532-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s10288-023-00532-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10288-023-00532-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10288-023-00532-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kapil Bawa & Robert Shoemaker, 2004. "The Effects of Free Sample Promotions on Incremental Brand Sales," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 345-363, November.
    2. Marius F. Niculescu & D. J. Wu, 2014. "Economics of Free Under Perpetual Licensing: Implications for the Software Industry," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 173-199, March.
    3. Paul Klemperer, 1995. "Competition when Consumers have Switching Costs: An Overview with Applications to Industrial Organization, Macroeconomics, and International Trade," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 62(4), pages 515-539.
    4. Hsing Kenneth Cheng & Yipeng Liu, 2012. "Optimal Software Free Trial Strategy: The Impact of Network Externalities and Consumer Uncertainty," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 488-504, June.
    5. Amir Heiman & Bruce McWilliams & Zhihua Shen & David Zilberman, 2001. "Learning and Forgetting: Modeling Optimal Product Sampling Over Time," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 532-546, April.
    6. Kristina Shampanier & Nina Mazar & Dan Ariely, 2007. "Zero as a Special Price: The True Value of Free Products," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 742-757, 11-12.
    7. Heiman, Amir & Ofir, Chezy, 2010. "The effects of imbalanced competition on demonstration strategies," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 175-187.
    8. Raphael Boleslavsky & Christopher S. Cotton & Haresh Gurnani, 2017. "Demonstrations and Price Competition in New Product Release," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 2016-2026, June.
    9. Roy Jones & Haim Mendelson, 2011. "Information Goods vs. Industrial Goods: Cost Structure and Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 164-176, January.
    10. Hoch, Stephen J, 2002. "Product Experience Is Seductive," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(3), pages 448-454, December.
    11. Michael L. Katz & Carl Shapiro, 1994. "Systems Competition and Network Effects," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 8(2), pages 93-115, Spring.
    12. Jyotishka Ray & Jayarajan Samuel & Syam Menon & Vijay Mookerjee, 2017. "The Design of Feature-Limited Demonstration Software: Choosing the Right Features to Include," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(1), pages 9-30, January.
    13. Bram Foubert & Els Gijsbrechts, 2016. "Try It, You’ll Like It—Or Will You? The Perils of Early Free-Trial Promotions for High-Tech Service Adoption," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 810-826, September.
    14. Chandukala, Sandeep R. & Dotson, Jeffrey P. & Liu, Qing, 2017. "An Assessment of When, Where and Under What Conditions In-Store Sampling is Most Effective," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 93(4), pages 493-506.
    15. Mariusz Górajski & Dominika Machowska, 2019. "How do loyalty programs affect goodwill? An optimal control approach," 4OR, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 297-316, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jyotishka Ray & Syam Menon & Vijay Mookerjee, 2020. "Bargaining over Data: When Does Making the Buyer More Informed Help?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Yanqing Han & Zongming Zhang, 2018. "Impact of free sampling on product diffusion based on Bass model," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 125-141, March.
    3. Sadat Reza & Hillbun Ho & Rich Ling & Hongyan Shi, 2021. "Experience Effect in the Impact of Free Trial Promotions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1648-1669, March.
    4. Wu, Lingli & Deng, Shiming & Jiang, Xuan, 2018. "Sampling and pricing strategy under competition," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 192-208.
    5. Guofang Nan & Xingtao Li & Zan Zhang & Minqiang Li, 0. "Optimal pricing for new product entry under free strategy," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-19.
    6. Guofang Nan & Xingtao Li & Zan Zhang & Minqiang Li, 2018. "Optimal pricing for new product entry under free strategy," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 1-19, March.
    7. Marius F. Niculescu & D. J. Wu, 2014. "Economics of Free Under Perpetual Licensing: Implications for the Software Industry," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 173-199, March.
    8. Ert, Eyal & Raz, Ornit & Heiman, Amir, 2016. "(Poor) seeing is believing: When direct experience impairs product promotion," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 881-895.
    9. Zhijie Lin & Ying Zhang & Yong Tan, 2019. "An Empirical Study of Free Product Sampling and Rating Bias," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 260-275, March.
    10. Bram Foubert & Els Gijsbrechts, 2016. "Try It, You’ll Like It—Or Will You? The Perils of Early Free-Trial Promotions for High-Tech Service Adoption," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 810-826, September.
    11. Zibo Liu & Zhijie Lin & Ying Zhang & Yong Tan, 2022. "The Signaling Effect of Sampling Size in Physical Goods Sampling Via Online Channels," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(2), pages 529-546, February.
    12. Kang Li & Jingwei Zhang & Lunchuan Zhang, 2021. "Optimal Software Feature-Limited Freemium Model Design: A New Consumer Learning Theoretical Framework," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-24, April.
    13. Steffen, Nico & Wiewiorra, Lukas & Kroon, Peter, 2021. "Wettbewerb und Regulierung in der Plattform- und Datenökonomie," WIK Discussion Papers 481, WIK Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste GmbH.
    14. Marius F. Niculescu & D. J. Wu & Lizhen Xu, 2018. "Strategic Intellectual Property Sharing: Competition on an Open Technology Platform Under Network Effects," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 498-519, June.
    15. Kim, Ju-Young & Natter, Martin & Spann, Martin, 2014. "Sampling, discounts or pay-what-you-want: Two field experiments," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 327-334.
    16. Christine Ringler & Nancy J. Sirianni & Joann Peck & Anders Gustafsson, 2024. "Does your demonstration tell the whole story? How a process mindset and social presence impact the effectiveness of product demonstrations," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 512-530, March.
    17. Luís Cabral, 2012. "Lock in and switch: Asymmetric information and new product diffusion," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 375-392, September.
    18. Angela Aerry Choi & Daegon Cho & Dobin Yim & Jae Yun Moon & Wonseok Oh, 2019. "When Seeing Helps Believing: The Interactive Effects of Previews and Reviews on E-Book Purchases," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 1164-1183, December.
    19. Li, Jingyan & Wu, Jie & Zhang, Juzhi & Ji, Xiang, 2024. "Freemium design: Optimal tier differentiation models for content platforms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    20. Jalili, Monire & Çil, Eren B. & Pangburn, Michael S., 2024. "Pricing and structuring product trials: Separate versus mixed wine tastings," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(2), pages 668-683.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aqjoor:v:21:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s10288-023-00532-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.