IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v348y2025i1d10.1007_s10479-023-05319-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Grey linguistic term sets for decision-making

Author

Listed:
  • Junliang Du

    (Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
    National University of Singapore)

  • Naiming Xie

    (Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics)

  • Sifeng Liu

    (Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics)

  • Mark Goh

    (National University of Singapore)

Abstract

In the era of Big Data, decision-making has become more complex and more uncertain. Faced with this situation, fuzzy linguistic approach may be an information representation model that is closer to natural language and people’s cognition habits than exact numerical models. Although Big Data has a large amount of data, the useful information is incomplete, scattered and poor. Thus, an expert may use a more uncertain linguistic expression, i.e., there exists one term, several non-consecutive terms and linguistic intervals at the same time. In view of grey system theory for presenting objective uncertainty, we propose a new concept of grey linguistic term set (GLTS). GLTS has realized a unified description of uncertain linguistic term, hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set, extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set, and can provide an effective tool for data generation, processing and fusion of Big Data. Firstly, inspired by generalised grey numbers, we propose the basic representation model, kernel, and degree of greyness for GLTS. Secondly, we study some basic operations for GLTSs, e.g., whitenisation, subset, complement, union, intersection, merge, meet, and two aggregation operators. Finally, we develop a novel multicriteria group decision making method for quality function deployment with grey linguistic information. An illustrative example about electric vehicle manufacturing company is used to demonstrate the application and effectiveness of the developed method.

Suggested Citation

  • Junliang Du & Naiming Xie & Sifeng Liu & Mark Goh, 2025. "Grey linguistic term sets for decision-making," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 348(1), pages 489-509, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:348:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-023-05319-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-023-05319-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-023-05319-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-023-05319-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Chen, Yue, 2021. "Circular supply chain management with large scale group decision making in the big data era: The macro-micro model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    2. Yinfeng Du & Dun Liu, 2021. "A novel approach to relative importance ratings of customer requirements in QFD based on probabilistic linguistic preferences," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 365-395, September.
    3. Chan, Lai-Kow & Wu, Ming-Lu, 2002. "Quality function deployment: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(3), pages 463-497, December.
    4. Herrera, F. & Herrera-Viedma, E., 2000. "Choice functions and mechanisms for linguistic preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 144-161, January.
    5. Wen-Tao Guo & Van-Nam Huynh & Songsak Sriboonchitta, 2017. "A proportional linguistic distribution based model for multiple attribute decision making under linguistic uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 256(2), pages 305-328, September.
    6. Mingwei Wang & Decui Liang & Zeshui Xu & Dajun Ye, 2021. "The evaluation of mobile health apps: A psychological perception-based probabilistic linguistic belief thermodynamic multiple attribute decision making method," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(11), pages 2596-2610, November.
    7. Guilherme Luz Tortorella & Flavio Sanson Fogliatto & Vijaya Sunder M & Alejandro Mac Cawley Vergara & Roberto Vassolo, 2022. "Assessment and prioritisation of Healthcare 4.0 implementation in hospitals using Quality Function Deployment," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(10), pages 3147-3169, May.
    8. Babar, Abdul Haseeb Khan & Ali, Yousaf, 2021. "Enhancement of electric vehicles’ market competitiveness using fuzzy quality function deployment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Yan-Lai & Tang, Jia-Fu & Chin, Kwai-Sang & Jiang, Yu-Shi & Han, Yi & Pu, Yun, 2011. "Estimating the final priority ratings of engineering characteristics in mature-period product improvement by MDBA and AHP," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 575-586, June.
    2. Iranmanesh, Hossein & Thomson, Vince, 2008. "Competitive advantage by adjusting design characteristics to satisfy cost targets," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 64-71, September.
    3. Cagli, Efe Caglar, 2023. "The volatility spillover between battery metals and future mobility stocks: Evidence from the time-varying frequency connectedness approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    4. Meng Fanyong & Tan Chunqiao, 2017. "Distance Measures for Hesitant Intuitionistic Fuzzy Linguistic Sets," ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, vol. 51(4), pages 207-224.
    5. J-B Yang & D-L Xu & X Xie & A K Maddulapalli, 2011. "Multicriteria evidential reasoning decision modelling and analysis—prioritizing voices of customer," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(9), pages 1638-1654, September.
    6. Elias Carayannis & Pantelis Kostis & Hasan Dinçer & Serhat Yüksel, 2024. "Quality Function Deployment-Oriented Strategic Outlook to Sustainable Energy Policies Based on Quintuple Innovation Helix," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 6761-6779, June.
    7. Nasser Fegh-hi Farahmand, 2016. "Imperative Strategic Planning as Improvement of the Decision Making of Organization," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 5(1), pages 10-19, March.
    8. Abderahman Rejeb & Karim Rejeb & John G. Keogh & Suhaiza Zailani, 2022. "Barriers to Blockchain Adoption in the Circular Economy: A Fuzzy Delphi and Best-Worst Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-23, March.
    9. Peng, Ruoqing & Tang, Justin Hayse Chiwing G. & Yang, Xiong & Meng, Meng & Zhang, Jie & Zhuge, Chengxiang, 2024. "Investigating the factors influencing the electric vehicle market share: A comparative study of the European Union and United States," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    10. Feng, Jianghong & Xu, Su Xiu & Xu, Gangyan & Cheng, Huibing, 2022. "An integrated decision-making method for locating parking centers of recyclable waste transportation vehicles," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    11. Chowdhury, Md. Maruf Hossan & Quaddus, Mohammed A., 2015. "A multiple objective optimization based QFD approach for efficient resilient strategies to mitigate supply chain vulnerabilities: The case of garment industry of Bangladesh☆,☆☆☆This manuscript was pro," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 57(PA), pages 5-21.
    12. Xin Wang & Li Wang & Xiaobo Xu & Ping Ji, 2014. "Identifying Employee Turnover Risks Using Modified Quality Function Deployment," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 398-404, May.
    13. Carnevalli, Jose A. & Miguel, Paulo Cauchick, 2008. "Review, analysis and classification of the literature on QFD--Types of research, difficulties and benefits," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 737-754, August.
    14. Nasser Fegh-hi Farahmand, 2017. "Imperative Strategic Planning as Improvement of the Decision Making of Organization," Issues in Economics and Business, Macrothink Institute, vol. 3(2), pages 30-45, December.
    15. Bin Pan & Jingti Han & Bo Tian & Yunhan Liu & Shenbao Liang, 2025. "Accelerating Consensus Reaching Through Top Persuaders: A Social Persuasion Model in Social Network Group Decision Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, January.
    16. Vida Norouz Borazjani & Mahmoud Abedi, 2014. "The Rule of Public Participation in Sustainable Design Process," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 4(12), pages 1191-1201, December.
    17. Xuemei Zhang & Haodong Zheng & Tao Hang & Qiang Meng, 2024. "How to Choose Recycling Mode between Monopoly and Competition by Considering Blockchain Technology?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-29, July.
    18. Snežana Tadić & Mladen Krstić & Violeta Roso & Nikolina Brnjac, 2019. "Planning an Intermodal Terminal for the Sustainable Transport Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-20, July.
    19. Leandro Gauss & Daniel P. Lacerda & Paulo A. Cauchick Miguel, 2021. "Module-based product family design: systematic literature review and meta-synthesis," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 265-312, January.
    20. Schillo, R. Sandra & Isabelle, Diane A. & Shakiba, Abtin, 2017. "Linking advanced biofuels policies with stakeholder interests: A method building on Quality Function Deployment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 126-137.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:348:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-023-05319-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.