IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v329y2023i1d10.1007_s10479-020-03784-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leveraging online customer reviews in new product development: a differential game approach

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Liu

    (Dongbei University of Finance & Economics)

  • Ke Xu

    (Dongbei University of Finance & Economics)

  • Ruirui Chai

    (Dongbei University of Finance & Economics
    North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power)

  • Xiang Fang

    (University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee)

Abstract

Large volumes of online product reviews generated by customers have important strategic values for new product development. We consider a duopoly setting where two manufacturers aim to develop their own new products and services. Applying a differential game framework, we examine how online customer reviews can be leveraged as external knowledge for manufacturers to develop new products. In our base models, we assume that the products supplied by the manufacturers are homogenous. First, we consider a closed innovation setting as a benchmark case in which both manufacturers develop new products by their internal R&D without leveraging online customer reviews. Second, we propose a model in which one manufacturer leverages online customer reviews as external knowledge, while the other manufacturer only relies on internal R&D effort. We derive analytical equilibrium solutions to both models. We find that when one manufacturer uses online customer reviews, if the manufacturer’s R&D process becomes more effective in improving its new product performance or reducing its cost, it certainly hurts the other manufacturer, but it may sometimes hurt this particular manufacturer as well. Furthermore, we demonstrate that when the manufacturer utilizes online customer reviews more in R&D, both manufacturers’ profits can either increase or decrease. In an extended model, we relax the product homogeneity assumption and obtain the equilibrium solution analytically. We show that main managerial insights still hold in the extend model.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Liu & Ke Xu & Ruirui Chai & Xiang Fang, 2023. "Leveraging online customer reviews in new product development: a differential game approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 329(1), pages 401-424, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:329:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-020-03784-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-020-03784-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-020-03784-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-020-03784-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. A. Elsadany & A. M. Awad, 2019. "Dynamics and chaos control of a duopolistic Bertrand competitions under environmental taxes," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 274(1), pages 211-240, March.
    2. Bertinelli, Luisito & Camacho, Carmen & Zou, Benteng, 2014. "Carbon capture and storage and transboundary pollution: A differential game approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(2), pages 721-728.
    3. Fanti, Luciano & Gori, Luca, 2012. "The dynamics of a differentiated duopoly with quantity competition," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 421-427.
    4. Dengpan Liu & Subodha Kumar & Vijay S. Mookerjee, 2012. "Advertising Strategies in Electronic Retailing: A Differential Games Approach," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(3-part-2), pages 903-917, September.
    5. Fouad El Ouardighi & Konstantin Kogan & Giorgio Gnecco & Marcello Sanguineti, 2020. "Transboundary pollution control and environmental absorption efficiency management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 287(2), pages 653-681, April.
    6. Chuang, Shu-Hui & Lin, Hong-Nan, 2015. "Co-creating e-service innovations: Theory, practice, and impact on firm performance," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 277-291.
    7. Vijay Mookerjee & Radha Mookerjee & Alain Bensoussan & Wei T. Yue, 2011. "When Hackers Talk: Managing Information Security Under Variable Attack Rates and Knowledge Dissemination," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 606-623, September.
    8. Dunk, Alan S., 2011. "Product innovation, budgetary control, and the financial performance of firms," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 102-111.
    9. Yuanzhu Zhan & Kim Hua Tan & Yina Li & Ying Kei Tse, 2018. "Unlocking the power of big data in new product development," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 270(1), pages 577-595, November.
    10. Likoebe M. Maruping & Viswanath Venkatesh & Ritu Agarwal, 2009. "A Control Theory Perspective on Agile Methodology Use and Changing User Requirements," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 377-399, September.
    11. Jørgensen, Steffen & Gromova, Ekaterina, 2016. "Sustaining cooperation in a differential game of advertising goodwill accumulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(1), pages 294-303.
    12. Emre M. Demirezen & Subodha Kumar & Bala Shetty, 2016. "Managing Co-Creation in Information Technology Projects: A Differential Games Approach," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 517-537.
    13. Nishikawa, Hidehiko & Schreier, Martin & Ogawa, Susumu, 2013. "User-generated versus designer-generated products: A performance assessment at Muji," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 160-167.
    14. Nirvikar Singh & Xavier Vives, 1984. "Price and Quantity Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 15(4), pages 546-554, Winter.
    15. Gadi Fibich & Arieh Gavious & Oded Lowengart, 2003. "Explicit Solutions of Optimization Models and Differential Games with Nonsmooth (Asymmetric) Reference-Price Effects," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(5), pages 721-734, October.
    16. Christopher Courtney & Supradeep Dutta & Yong Li, 2017. "Resolving Information Asymmetry: Signaling, Endorsement, and Crowdfunding Success," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 41(2), pages 265-290, March.
    17. Dockner,Engelbert J. & Jorgensen,Steffen & Long,Ngo Van & Sorger,Gerhard, 2000. "Differential Games in Economics and Management Science," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521637329, June.
    18. Jiho Yoon & Claudia Rosales & Srinivas Talluri, 2018. "Inter-firm partnerships – strategic alliances in the pharmaceutical industry," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1-2), pages 862-881, January.
    19. Anthony Creane, 2002. "Uncertain Product Quality, Optimal Pricing and Product Development," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 114(1), pages 83-103, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuntao Bai & Qiang Wang & Yueling Yang, 2022. "From Pollution Control Cooperation of Lancang-Mekong River to “Two Mountains Theory”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, February.
    2. Boucekkine, Raouf & Ruan, Weihua & Zou, Benteng, 2023. "The irreversible pollution game," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    3. El Ouardighi, Fouad & Sim, Jeongeun & Kim, Bowon, 2021. "Pollution accumulation and abatement policies in two supply chains under vertical and horizontal competition and strategy types," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    4. Colombo, Luca & Labrecciosa, Paola, 2021. "Dynamic oligopoly pricing with reference-price effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(3), pages 1006-1016.
    5. Hao Xu & Ming Luo, 2022. "Optimal Environmental Policy in a Dynamic Transboundary Pollution Game: Emission Standards, Taxes, and Permit Trading," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-25, July.
    6. Emre M. Demirezen & Subodha Kumar & Bala Shetty, 2016. "Managing Co-Creation in Information Technology Projects: A Differential Games Approach," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 517-537.
    7. Javier Frutos & Víctor Gatón & Paula M. López-Pérez & Guiomar Martín-Herrán, 2022. "Investment in Cleaner Technologies in a Transboundary Pollution Dynamic Game: A Numerical Investigation," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 813-843, September.
    8. Li, Wen-na & Elsadany, A.A. & Zhou, Wei & Zhu, Yan-lan, 2021. "Global Analysis, Multi-stability and Synchronization in a Competition Model of Public Enterprises with Consumer Surplus," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    9. Andaluz, J. & Elsadany, A.A. & Jarne, G., 2017. "Nonlinear Cournot and Bertrand-type dynamic triopoly with differentiated products and heterogeneous expectations," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 86-99.
    10. Luca Lambertini & Andrea Mantovani, 2010. "Process and product innovation: A differential game approach to product life cycle," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 6(2), pages 227-252, June.
    11. Ouardighi, Fouad El & Sim, Jeong Eun & Kim, Bowon, 2016. "Pollution accumulation and abatement policy in a supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 982-996.
    12. Dengpan Liu & Subodha Kumar & Vijay S. Mookerjee, 2020. "Flexible and Committed Advertising Contracts in Electronic Retailing," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 323-339, June.
    13. Guido Candela & Roberto Cellini, 2006. "Investment in Tourism Market: A Dynamic Model of Differentiated Oligopoly," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 35(1), pages 41-58, September.
    14. Colombo, Luca & Lambertini, Luca & Mantovani, Andrea, 2009. "Endogenous transportation technology in a Cournot differential game with intraindustry trade," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 133-139, March.
    15. Yu, Weisheng & Yu, Yu, 2014. "The complexion of dynamic duopoly game with horizontal differentiated products," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 289-297.
    16. Kogan, Konstantin & El Ouardighi, Fouad, 2024. "Environmental sustainability under production competition with costly adjustments: An appraisal of firms’ behavior with regard to pollution dynamics," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    17. Hao Xu & Deqing Tan, 2023. "Optimal Abatement Technology Licensing in a Dynamic Transboundary Pollution Game: Fixed Fee Versus Royalty," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 61(3), pages 905-935, March.
    18. Joaquín Andaluz & Gloria Jarne, 2016. "Stability of vertically differentiated Cournot and Bertrand-type models when firms are boundedly rational," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 1-25, March.
    19. He Li & Erbao Cao, 2023. "Competitive crowdfunding under asymmetric quality information," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 329(1), pages 657-688, October.
    20. Raouf Boucekkine & Carmen Camacho & Weihua Ruan & Benteng Zou, 2022. "Why and when coalitions split? An alternative analytical approach with an application to environmental agreements," Working Papers halshs-03676670, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:329:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-020-03784-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.