IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v315y2022i2d10.1007_s10479-021-04300-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recommendation of investment portfolio for peer-to-peer lending with additional consideration of bidding period

Author

Listed:
  • Ki Taek Park

    (Yonsei University)

  • Hyejeong Yang

    (Yonsei University)

  • So Young Sohn

    (Yonsei University)

Abstract

Peer-to-peer (P2P) lending has emerged as an alternative method of financing. Keeping pace with this development, many P2P lending studies have provided approaches to select investment portfolios for individual lenders. However, none of these approaches consider how long it takes for an individual loan to be fully funded so as to reduce the opportunity cost incurred due to delayed investment. In this paper, we propose a goal programming framework to develop an optimal P2P lending portfolio that considers not only the expected returns but also this opportunity cost for individual investors. First, for each loan proposal, a logistic regression model is used to predict the loan default probability while a Weibull regression is used to determine the opportunity cost incurred due to the time taken to obtain the loan. Next, goal programming is applied to construct a portfolio that minimizes the slack from the desired return on investment as well as the surplus from the preset opportunity cost due to a prolonged bidding period. The proposed approach is then applied to Prosper platform data and is expected to help investors’ portfolio decisions in the P2P lending market.

Suggested Citation

  • Ki Taek Park & Hyejeong Yang & So Young Sohn, 2022. "Recommendation of investment portfolio for peer-to-peer lending with additional consideration of bidding period," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 1083-1105, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:315:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-021-04300-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-021-04300-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-021-04300-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-021-04300-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guo, Yanhong & Zhou, Wenjun & Luo, Chunyu & Liu, Chuanren & Xiong, Hui, 2016. "Instance-based credit risk assessment for investment decisions in P2P lending," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(2), pages 417-426.
    2. Dongwoo Kim, 2020. "The importance of detailed patterns of herding behaviour in a P2P lending market," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 127-130, January.
    3. Iyer, Rajkamal & Khwaja, Asim Ijaz & Luttmer, Erzo F. P. & Shue, Kelly, 2009. "Screening in New Credit Markets: Can Individual Lenders Infer Borrower Creditworthiness in Peer-to-Peer Lending?," Working Paper Series rwp09-031, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    4. Cuiqing Jiang & Zhao Wang & Ruiya Wang & Yong Ding, 2018. "Loan default prediction by combining soft information extracted from descriptive text in online peer-to-peer lending," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 266(1), pages 511-529, July.
    5. Jackson J. Mi & Tianxiao Hu & Luke Deer, 2018. "User Data Can Tell Defaulters in P2P Lending," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 59-67, March.
    6. Constantin Zopounidis & Michalis Doumpos & Kyriaki Kosmidou, 2018. "Preface: analytical models for financial modeling and risk management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 266(1), pages 1-4, July.
    7. Conlin, Michael, 1999. "Peer group micro-lending programs in Canada and the United States," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 249-269, October.
    8. Paul Belleflamme & Thomas Lambert & Armin Schwienbacher, 2013. "Individual crowdfunding practices," Venture Capital, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 313-333, October.
    9. Lejeune, Miguel A. & Shen, Siqian, 2016. "Multi-objective probabilistically constrained programs with variable risk: Models for multi-portfolio financial optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(2), pages 522-539.
    10. Mingfeng Lin & Nagpurnanand R. Prabhala & Siva Viswanathan, 2013. "Judging Borrowers by the Company They Keep: Friendship Networks and Information Asymmetry in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 17-35, August.
    11. Rafael Gomez & Eric Santor, 2003. "Do Peer Group Members Outperform Individual Borrowers? A Test of Peer Group Lending Using Canadian Micro-Credit Data," Staff Working Papers 03-33, Bank of Canada.
    12. Xiangxiang Zeng & Li Liu & Stephen Leung & Jiangze Du & Xun Wang & Tao Li, 2017. "A decision support model for investment on P2P lending platform," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, September.
    13. Mollick, Ethan, 2014. "The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 1-16.
    14. Sonenshein, Scott & Herzenstein, Michal & Dholakia, Utpal M., 2011. "How accounts shape lending decisions through fostering perceived trustworthiness," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 69-84, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreas Hoegen & Dennis M. Steininger & Daniel Veit, 2018. "How do investors decide? An interdisciplinary review of decision-making in crowdfunding," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 28(3), pages 339-365, August.
    2. Dongwoo Kim, 2023. "Can investors’ collective decision-making evolve? Evidence from peer-to-peer lending markets," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 1323-1358, June.
    3. Samuel Ribeiro-Navarrete & Juan Piñeiro-Chousa & M. Ángeles López-Cabarcos & Daniel Palacios-Marqués, 2022. "Crowdlending: mapping the core literature and research frontiers," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(8), pages 2381-2411, November.
    4. Douglas Cumming & Lars Hornuf & Moein Karami & Denis Schweizer, 2023. "Disentangling Crowdfunding from Fraudfunding," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(4), pages 1103-1128, February.
    5. Ata Allah Taleizadeh & Aria Zaker Safaei & Arijit Bhattacharya & Alireza Amjadian, 2022. "Online peer-to-peer lending platform and supply chain finance decisions and strategies," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(1), pages 397-427, August.
    6. Yufei Xia & Lingyun He & Yinguo Li & Nana Liu & Yanlin Ding, 2020. "Predicting loan default in peer‐to‐peer lending using narrative data," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(2), pages 260-280, March.
    7. Xuchen Lin & Xiaolong Li & Zhong Zheng, 2017. "Evaluating borrower’s default risk in peer-to-peer lending: evidence from a lending platform in China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(35), pages 3538-3545, July.
    8. Qizhi Tao & Yizhe Dong & Ziming Lin, 2017. "Who can get money? Evidence from the Chinese peer-to-peer lending platform," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 425-441, June.
    9. Fabrice Hervé & Armin Schwienbacher, 2018. "Crowdfunding And Innovation," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(5), pages 1514-1530, December.
    10. Ajay Byanjankar & József Mezei & Markku Heikkilä, 2021. "Data‐driven optimization of peer‐to‐peer lending portfolios based on the expected value framework," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(2), pages 119-129, April.
    11. Li, Zhiyong & Li, Aimin & Bellotti, Anthony & Yao, Xiao, 2023. "The profitability of online loans: A competing risks analysis on default and prepayment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(2), pages 968-985.
    12. Gregor Dorfleitner & Eva-Maria Oswald & Rongxin Zhang, 2021. "From Credit Risk to Social Impact: On the Funding Determinants in Interest-Free Peer-to-Peer Lending," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(2), pages 375-400, May.
    13. Laurell, Christofer & Sandström, Christian & Suseno, Yuliani, 2019. "Assessing the interplay between crowdfunding and sustainability in social media," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 117-127.
    14. Qizhi Tao & Yizhe Dong & Ziming Lin, 0. "Who can get money? Evidence from the Chinese peer-to-peer lending platform," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-17.
    15. Nikolaus Lipusch & Dominik Dellermann & Ulrich Bretschneider & Philipp Ebel & Jan Marco Leimeister, 2020. "Designing for Crowdfunding Co-creation," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(6), pages 483-499, December.
    16. Kuti, Mónika & Galambosné Tiszberger, Mónika & Czigler, Enikő, 2018. "Magyarországról indított közösségi finanszírozású kampányok. A Kickstarter-platform esete [Kick-starter campaigns launched from Hungary]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 206-225.
    17. Cai, Wanxiang & Polzin, Friedemann & Stam, Erik, 2021. "Crowdfunding and social capital: A systematic review using a dynamic perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    18. Wang, Tong & Zhao, Sheng & Zhou, Mengqiu, 2022. "Does soft information in expert ratings curb information asymmetry? Evidence from crowdfunding and early transaction phases of Initial Coin offerings," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    19. Anglin, Aaron H. & Short, Jeremy C. & Drover, Will & Stevenson, Regan M. & McKenny, Aaron F. & Allison, Thomas H., 2018. "The power of positivity? The influence of positive psychological capital language on crowdfunding performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 470-492.
    20. Pabst, Stefan & Mohnen, Alwine, 2021. "On founders and dictators: Does it pay to pay for signals in crowdfunding?," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 15(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:315:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-021-04300-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.