IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v222y2014i1p341-35910.1007-s10479-013-1372-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evader interdiction: algorithms, complexity and collateral damage

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Johnson
  • Alexander Gutfraind
  • Kiyan Ahmadizadeh

Abstract

In network interdiction problems, evaders (e.g., hostile agents or data packets) are moving through a network toward targets and we wish to choose locations for sensors in order to intercept the evaders. The evaders might follow deterministic routes or Markov chains, or they may be reactive, i.e., able to change their routes in order to avoid the sensors. The challenge in such problems is to choose sensor locations economically, balancing interdiction gains with costs, including the inconvenience sensors inflict upon innocent travelers. We study the objectives of (1) maximizing the number of evaders captured when limited by a budget on sensing cost and, (2) capturing all evaders as cheaply as possible. We give algorithms for optimal sensor placement in several classes of special graphs and hardness and approximation results for general graphs, including evaders who are deterministic, Markov chain-based, reactive and unreactive. A similar-sounding but fundamentally different problem setting was posed by Glazer and Rubinstein where both evaders and innocent travelers are reactive. We again give optimal algorithms for special cases and hardness and approximation results on general graphs. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Johnson & Alexander Gutfraind & Kiyan Ahmadizadeh, 2014. "Evader interdiction: algorithms, complexity and collateral damage," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 222(1), pages 341-359, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:222:y:2014:i:1:p:341-359:10.1007/s10479-013-1372-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-013-1372-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10479-013-1372-x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-013-1372-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alan W. McMasters & Thomas M. Mustin, 1970. "Optimal interdiction of a supply network," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 261-268, September.
    2. H. W. Corley, Jr. & Han Chang, 1974. "Finding the n Most Vital Nodes in a Flow Network," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 362-364, November.
    3. H. Donald Ratliff & G. Thomas Sicilia & S. H. Lubore, 1975. "Finding the n Most Vital Links in Flow Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(5), pages 531-539, January.
    4. Nimrod Megiddo, 1981. "The Maximum Coverage Location Problem," Discussion Papers 490, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    5. , & ,, 2006. "A study in the pragmatics of persuasion: a game theoretical approach," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 1(4), pages 395-410, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Jing & Zhuang, Jun & Behlendorf, Brandon, 2018. "Stochastic shortest path network interdiction with a case study of Arizona–Mexico border," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 62-73.
    2. Jing Yang & Juan S. Borrero & Oleg A. Prokopyev & Denis Sauré, 2021. "Sequential Shortest Path Interdiction with Incomplete Information and Limited Feedback," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 218-244, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tony H. Grubesic & Timothy C. Matisziw & Alan T. Murray & Diane Snediker, 2008. "Comparative Approaches for Assessing Network Vulnerability," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 31(1), pages 88-112, January.
    2. Alan Murray & Timothy Matisziw & Tony Grubesic, 2007. "Critical network infrastructure analysis: interdiction and system flow," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 103-117, June.
    3. Jabarzare, Ziba & Zolfagharinia, Hossein & Najafi, Mehdi, 2020. "Dynamic interdiction networks with applications in illicit supply chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    4. Smith, J. Cole & Song, Yongjia, 2020. "A survey of network interdiction models and algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 797-811.
    5. Kosanoglu, Fuat & Bier, Vicki M., 2020. "Target-oriented utility for interdiction of transportation networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    6. Berman, Oded & Krass, Dmitry & Drezner, Zvi, 2003. "The gradual covering decay location problem on a network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(3), pages 474-480, December.
    7. Xinyu Huang & Dongming Chen & Dongqi Wang & Tao Ren, 2020. "MINE: Identifying Top- k Vital Nodes in Complex Networks via Maximum Influential Neighbors Expansion," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-25, August.
    8. Winand Emons & Claude Fluet, 2019. "Strategic communication with reporting costs," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 87(3), pages 341-363, October.
    9. Evans, R., Reiche, S. & Reiche, S., 2022. "When is a Contrarian Adviser Optimal?," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2222, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    10. Sergiu Hart & Ilan Kremer & Motty Perry, 2017. "Evidence Games: Truth and Commitment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(3), pages 690-713, March.
    11. Strausz, Roland, 2017. "Mechanism Design with Partially Verifiable Information," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 45, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    12. Abumoslem Mohammadi & Javad Tayyebi, 2019. "Maximum Capacity Path Interdiction Problem with Fixed Costs," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 36(04), pages 1-21, August.
    13. Peker, Meltem & Kara, Bahar Y., 2015. "The P-Hub maximal covering problem and extensions for gradual decay functions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 158-172.
    14. Elchanan Ben-Porath & Eddie Dekel & Barton L Lipman, 2018. "Disclosure and Choice," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 85(3), pages 1471-1501.
    15. Russell Halper & S. Raghavan, 2011. "The Mobile Facility Routing Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(3), pages 413-434, August.
    16. Elliot Lipnowski & Doron Ravid, 2020. "Cheap Talk With Transparent Motives," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(4), pages 1631-1660, July.
    17. Blanquero, Rafael & Carrizosa, Emilio & G.-Tóth, Boglárka, 2016. "Maximal Covering Location Problems on networks with regional demand," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 77-85.
    18. Matthias Lang, 2020. "Mechanism Design with Narratives," CESifo Working Paper Series 8502, CESifo.
    19. Cristina Bazgan & Sonia Toubaline & Daniel Vanderpooten, 2013. "Critical edges/nodes for the minimum spanning tree problem: complexity and approximation," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 178-189, July.
    20. Rodríguez-Núñez, Eduardo & García-Palomares, Juan Carlos, 2014. "Measuring the vulnerability of public transport networks," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 50-63.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:222:y:2014:i:1:p:341-359:10.1007/s10479-013-1372-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.