IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v196y2012i1p311-33110.1007-s10479-012-1076-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fleet replacement under technological shocks

Author

Listed:
  • Natali Hritonenko
  • Yuri Yatsenko

Abstract

The paper analyzes a fleet replacement problem under general assumptions about technological improvement. The corresponding optimization model considers the variable lifetime of assets in deterministic infinite-horizon settings. The optimal dynamics of the asset lifetime and investment is investigated analytically and numerically under continuous technological change and technological shocks that affect the operating and new asset costs. The obtained results contribute to the OR replacement theory and suggest simple rules for the efficient fleet replacement under improving technology. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Suggested Citation

  • Natali Hritonenko & Yuri Yatsenko, 2012. "Fleet replacement under technological shocks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 311-331, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:196:y:2012:i:1:p:311-331:10.1007/s10479-012-1076-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-012-1076-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10479-012-1076-7
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-012-1076-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malcomson, James M., 1975. "Replacement and the rental value of capital equipment subject to obsolescence," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 24-41, February.
    2. Boucekkine, Raouf & Germain, Marc & Licandro, Omar, 1997. "Replacement Echoes in the Vintage Capital Growth Model," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 333-348, June.
    3. Boucekkine, Raouf & Germain, Marc & Licandro, Omar & Magnus, Alphonse, 1998. "Creative Destruction, Investment Volatility, and the Average Age of Capital," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 361-384, December.
    4. Yatsenko, Yuri & Hritonenko, Natali, 2008. "Technological breakthroughs and asset replacement," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2008074, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    5. Sampath Rajagopalan & Medini R. Singh & Thomas E. Morton, 1998. "Capacity Expansion and Replacement in Growing Markets with Uncertain Technological Breakthroughs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 12-30, January.
    6. Shey-Huei Sheu & Chin-Chih Chang & Yu-Hung Chien, 2011. "Optimal age-replacement time with minimal repair based on cumulative repair-cost limit for a system subject to shocks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 317-329, June.
    7. Abraham Mehrez & Gad Rabinowitz & Eli Shemesh, 2000. "A Discrete Maintenance and Replacement Model under Technological Breakthrough Expectations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 99(1), pages 351-372, December.
    8. Yatsenko, Yuri & Hritonenko, Natali, 2008. "Properties of optimal service life under technological change," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 230-238, July.
    9. Chand, Suresh & McClurg, Tim & Ward, Jim, 2000. "A model for parallel machine replacement with capacity expansion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(3), pages 519-531, March.
    10. Cooley, Thomas F. & Greenwood, Jeremy & Yorukoglu, Mehmet, 1997. "The replacement problem," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 457-499, December.
    11. Wallace J. Hopp & Suresh K. Nair, 1991. "Timing replacement decisions under discontinuous technological change," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(2), pages 203-220, April.
    12. Joseph C. Hartman, 2000. "The parallel replacement problem with demand and capital budgeting constraints," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(1), pages 40-56, February.
    13. van Hilten, Onno, 1991. "The optimal lifetime of capital equipment," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 449-454, December.
    14. James C. Bean & Jack R. Lohmann & Robert L. Smith, 1994. "Equipment replacement under technological change," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(1), pages 117-128, February.
    15. Hritonenko, Natali & Yatsenko, Yuri, 2010. "Technological innovations, economic renovation, and anticipation effects," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 1064-1078, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Xinyang & Zheng, Zhuoyuan & Büyüktahtakın, İ. Esra & Zhou, Zhi & Wang, Pingfeng, 2021. "Battery asset management with cycle life prognosis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    2. Mellal, Mohamed Arezki, 2020. "Obsolescence – A review of the literature," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    3. Ansaripoor, Amir H. & Oliveira, Fernando S. & Liret, Anne, 2014. "A risk management system for sustainable fleet replacement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(2), pages 701-712.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yatsenko, Yuri & Hritonenko, Natali, 2008. "Properties of optimal service life under technological change," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 230-238, July.
    2. Gamboa, Franklin & Maldonado, Wilfredo Leiva, 2014. "Feasibility and optimality of the initial capital stock in the Ramsey vintage capital model," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 40-45.
    3. Yu. Yatsenko & N. Hritonenko, 2007. "Network economics and optimal replacement of age-structured IT capital," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 65(3), pages 483-497, June.
    4. Blanca MARTINEZ, 2002. "Adoption Costs, Age of Capital and Technological Substitution," LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES 2002024, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
    5. Boucekkine, Raouf & Licandro, Omar & Paul, Christopher, 1997. "Differential-difference equations in economics: On the numerical solution of vintage capital growth models," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 21(2-3), pages 347-362.
    6. Kredler, Matthias, 2014. "Vintage human capital and learning curves," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 154-178.
    7. Yatsenko, Yuri & Hritonenko, Natali, 2020. "Optimal asset replacement: Profit maximization under varying technology," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    8. Bruno de Oliveira Cruz & Raouf Boucekkine, 2006. "Technological Progress and Investment Microeconomic Foundations and Macroeconomic Implications," Discussion Papers 1170, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada - IPEA.
    9. Boucekkine, Raouf & Pommeret, Aude, 2004. "Energy saving technical progress and optimal capital stock: the role of embodiment," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 429-444, May.
    10. Raouf Boucekkine & David De la Croix & Omar Licandro, 2011. "Vintage Capital Growth Theory: Three Breakthroughs," Working Papers 565, Barcelona School of Economics.
    11. Boucekkine, Raouf & del Rio, Fernando & Licandro, Omar, 1999. "Endogenous vs Exogenously Driven Fluctuations in Vintage Capital Models," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 161-187, September.
    12. Bitros, George C., 2009. "The Theorem of Proportionality in Mainstream Capital Theory: An Assessment of its Conceptual Foundations," MPRA Paper 17436, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Raouf BOUCEKKINE & Aude POMMERET, 2000. "Optimal Capital Accumulation, Energy Cost and the Nature of Technological Progress," LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES 2001023, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
    14. George Bitros, 2010. "The theorem of proportionality in contemporary capital theory: An assessment of its conceptual foundations," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 23(4), pages 367-401, December.
    15. Hritonenko, Natali & Yatsenko, Yuri, 2010. "Technological innovations, economic renovation, and anticipation effects," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 1064-1078, November.
    16. Raouf Boucekkine & Natali Hritonenko & Yuri Yatsenko, 2013. "Health, Work Intensity, and Technological Innovations," Working Papers halshs-00805199, HAL.
    17. Raouf Boucekkine & Bruno de Oliveira Cruz, 2015. "Technological Progress and Investment: A Non-Technical Survey," AMSE Working Papers 1519, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
    18. AZOMAHOU, Théophile & BOUCEKKINE, Raouf & NGUYEN-VAN, Phu, 2009. "Promoting clean technologies under imperfect competition," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2009011, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    19. Natali Hritonenko & Yuri Yatsenko, 2008. "From Linear to Nonlinear Utility in Vintage Capital Models," Mathematical Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 230-248.
    20. Théophile T. Azomahou & Raouf Boucekkine & Phu Nguyen-Vanc, "undated". "Promoting Clean Technologies: The Energy Market Structure Crucially Matters," Working Papers 2008_13, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:196:y:2012:i:1:p:311-331:10.1007/s10479-012-1076-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.