IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/agrhuv/v15y1998i1p3-14.html

Scientific and local classification and management of soils

Author

Listed:
  • Shankarappa Talawar
  • Robert Rhoades

Abstract

A critical comparative analysis of howfarmers and scientists classify and manage soilsreveals fundamental differences as well assimilarities. In the past, the study of local soilknowledge has been predominantly targeted atdocumenting how farmers classified their soils incontrast to understanding how such classificatoryknowledge was made use of in actually managing soilsfor sustaining production. Often, classificatorydesigns – being cognitive and linguistic in nature –do not reflect the day-to-day actions in farming.Instead of merely describing local soil classificationin relation to scientific criteria, understanding howdifferent types of ethnolinguistic soil categories arerelated to crops, climate, subsistence needs,fertility, market demand, and cultural norms of thesociety would be far more effective in focusingresearch and development efforts. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Suggested Citation

  • Shankarappa Talawar & Robert Rhoades, 1998. "Scientific and local classification and management of soils," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 15(1), pages 3-14, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:15:y:1998:i:1:p:3-14
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1007497521205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1007497521205
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1007497521205?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bellon, Mauricio R & Taylor, J Edward, 1993. ""Folk" Soil Taxonomy and the Partial Adoption of New Seed Varieties," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 41(4), pages 763-786, July.
    2. de Queiroz, Joao Stacishin & Norton, Brien E., 1992. "An assessment of an indigenous soil classification used in the caatinga region of Ceara State, Northeast Brazil," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 289-305.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Raina, Rajeswari S. & Sangar, Sunita & Rasheed Sulaiman, V. & Hall, Andrew J., 2006. "The soil sciences in India: Policy lessons for agricultural innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 691-714, June.
    2. Laura Greig, 2009. "An Analysis of the Key Factors Influencing Farmer’s Choice of Crop, Kibamba Ward, Tanzania," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 699-715, September.
    3. Palaniappan, Gomathy & King, Christine A. & Cameron, Don, 2009. "CS - Complexity Of Transition To Alternative Farming Systems," 17th Congress, Illinois State University, USA, July 19-24, 2009 345531, International Farm Management Association.
    4. Lauren Pincus & Heidi Ballard & Emily Harris & Kate Scow, 2018. "Seeing below the surface: making soil processes visible to Ugandan smallholder farmers through a constructivist and experiential extension approach," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 35(2), pages 425-440, June.
    5. Michael Kaplowitz, 2000. "Identifying ecosystem services using multiple methods: Lessons from the mangrove wetlands of Yucatan, Mexico," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 17(2), pages 169-179, June.
    6. Ravnborg, Helle Munk, 2003. "Poverty and Environmental Degradation in the Nicaraguan Hillsides," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(11), pages 1933-1946, November.
    7. Ahmed Abdalla & Till Stellmacher & Mathias Becker, 2023. "Wheat Farmers’ Perception of Constraints and Their Adaptive Capacity to Changing Demands in Egypt," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Ademola Braimoh, 2002. "Integrating indigenous knowledge and soil science to develop a national soil classification system for Nigeria," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 19(1), pages 75-80, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goswami, Rupak & Biswas, Malay Sankar & Basu, Debabrata, "undated". "Validation of Participatory Farming Situation Identification: Case of Rainfed Rice Cultivation in Selected Area of West Bengal, India," Working Papers/Conference Papers 97599, Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananda University, Integrated Rural Development and Management Faculty Centre.
    2. Teklewold, Hailemariam & Kassie, Menale & Shiferaw, Bekele & Köhlin, Gunnar, 2013. "Cropping system diversification, conservation tillage and modern seed adoption in Ethiopia: Impacts on household income, agrochemical use and demand for labor," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 85-93.
    3. Ekin Birol & Melinda Smale & Agnes Gyovai, 2005. "Sustainable Use and Management of Crop Genetic Resources: Landraces on Hungarian Small Farms," Environmental Economy and Policy Research Working Papers 02.2005, University of Cambridge, Department of Land Economics, revised 2005.
    4. Bellon, Mauricio R., 2004. "Conceptualizing Interventions to Support On-Farm Genetic Resource Conservation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 159-172, January.
    5. Takefumi Fujimoto & Aya Suzuki, 2024. "Do fertilizer and seed subsidies strengthen farmers' market participation? Evidence from Tanzania's subsidy program," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 339-359, February.
    6. Bekelc Shiferaw & Stein T. Holden, 1998. "Resource degradation and adoption of land conservation technologies in the Ethiopian Highlands: A case study in Andit Tid, North Shewa," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 18(3), pages 233-247, May.
    7. Becerril, Javier & Abdulai, Awudu, 2010. "The Impact of Improved Maize Varieties on Poverty in Mexico: A Propensity Score-Matching Approach," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 1024-1035, July.
    8. Quetzalcóatl Orozco-Ramírez & Marta Astier, 2017. "Socio-economic and environmental changes related to maize richness in Mexico’s central highlands," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(2), pages 377-391, June.
    9. Ravnborg, Helle Munk, 2003. "Poverty and Environmental Degradation in the Nicaraguan Hillsides," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(11), pages 1933-1946, November.
    10. Rao, Xudong, 2014. "Land Fragmentation with Double Bonuses -- The Case of Tanzanian Agriculture," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 169436, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    11. Sain, Gustavo & Martinez, Julio, 1999. "Adoption and Use of Improved Maize by Small-Scale Farmers in Southeast Guatemala," Economics Working Papers 7687, CIMMYT: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center.
    12. Wood, David, 1996. "The benign effect of some agricultural specialization on the environment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 107-111, November.
    13. Pascual, Unai, 2005. "Land use intensification potential in slash-and-burn farming through improvements in technical efficiency," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 497-511, March.
    14. Asjad Tariq Sheikh & Atakelty Hailu & Amin Mugera & Ram Pandit & Stephen Davies, 2024. "Soil quality evaluation for irrigated agroecological zones of Punjab, Pakistan: The Luenberger indicator approach," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 55(3), pages 531-553, May.
    15. Schuck, Eric C. & Birchall, Scott, 2001. "Manure Bmp Adoption Among North Dakota Animal Feed Operations," 2001 Annual Meeting, July 8-11, 2001, Logan, Utah 36046, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    16. S?ren Marcus Pedersen & Kim Martin Lind & Orjon Xhoxhi & Attila Yazar & Sven-Erik Jacobsen & Jens Erik ?rum, 2020. "Introducing quinoa in Turkey - farmers perception in the region of Adana," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 22(1), pages 1-24.
    17. J. Taylor & Irma Adelman, 2003. "Agricultural Household Models: Genesis, Evolution, and Extensions," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 33-58, January.
    18. Arslan, Aslihan & McCarthy, Nancy & Lipper, Leslie & Asfaw, Solomon & Cattaneo, Andrea, "undated". "Adoption and intensity of adoption of conservation farming practices in Zambia," ESA Working Papers 288991, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA).
    19. Melinda Smale & Leslie Lipper & Phoebe Koundouri, 2006. "Scope, Limitations and Future Directions," DEOS Working Papers 0601, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    20. Bellon, Mauricio R., 2001. "Demand and Supply of Crop Infraspecific Diversity on Farms: Towards a Policy Framework for On-Farm Conservation," Economics Working Papers 7666, CIMMYT: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:15:y:1998:i:1:p:3-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.