IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/vision/v20y2016i3p224-236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer Preferences and Purchase Decision-making for Micro-packs— An Empirical Study

Author

Listed:
  • Preeti Mehra
  • Raghbir Singh

Abstract

This study offers and validates a comprehensive approach to explain and predict the beliefs influencing consumer needs and the motivations behind their purchase decisions. The study aims at understanding the consumers purchase intentions on the basis of responses given by the respondents. In order to attain these objectives, a sample of 500 respondents belonging to three cities of Punjab: Jalandhar, Amritsar and Ludhiana; and Union territory of Chandigarh was drawn. Non-probability convenient sampling was adopted for selecting the respondents. It was however found that reasons such as ‘a big pack is difficult to store’ and ‘difficult to handle’ primarily lead them to prefer a micro-pack. ‘Advertisement on print and electronic media’ was the most preferred source of information and ‘past performance’ of a micro-pack was the most significant attribute while making a purchase decision. ‘Wide assortment of a single brand’ emerged as the most persuasive effort undertaken by retailers for building customers perceptions towards a brand. A store that was the most ‘Neat and tidy’ was the most favoured one. Respondents expressed that in case of an unfortunate purchase, they preferred to ‘forget about it’ and switched to another brand when they were ‘impressed by the advertisement of a new brand’.

Suggested Citation

  • Preeti Mehra & Raghbir Singh, 2016. "Consumer Preferences and Purchase Decision-making for Micro-packs— An Empirical Study," Vision, , vol. 20(3), pages 224-236, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:20:y:2016:i:3:p:224-236
    DOI: 10.1177/0972262916652806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972262916652806
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972262916652806?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Faison, Edmund W J, 1977. "The Neglected Variety Drive: A Useful Concept for Consumer Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 4(3), pages 172-175, December.
    2. Irina Kancheva & Georgi Marinov, 2014. "Perceptions Of Marital Roles In Basic Commodity Groups Purchase Decision-Making," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(16), pages 1-13.
    3. Walker, Beth A. & Olson, Jerry C., 1991. "Means-end chains: Connecting products with self," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 111-118, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahlam Mohammed Al-Abdullatif & Hibah Khalid Aladsani, 2021. "Understanding Instructors’ Cognitive Structure Toward the Academic Use of Social Network Sites: The Means–End Chain Theory," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    2. Ramo Barrena & Mercedes Sánchez, 2010. "The link between household structure and the level of abstraction in the purchase decision process: an analysis using a functional food," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 243-264.
    3. Aebli, Annika, 2019. "Tourists' motives for gamified technology use," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Yousaf, Anish & Mishra, Abhishek & Gupta, Anil, 2021. "‘From technology adoption to consumption’: Effect of pre-adoption expectations from fitness applications on usage satisfaction, continual usage, and health satisfaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    5. Brendan Markey-Towler, 2018. "A formal psychological theory for evolutionary economics," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 691-725, September.
    6. Jiemiao Chen & Xiaojing Yang & Robert E. Smith, 2016. "The effects of creativity on advertising wear-in and wear-out," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 334-349, May.
    7. Pieters, R. & Baumgartner, H. & Allen, D., 1995. "A means-end chain approach to consumers' goal structures," Other publications TiSEM 7d190b0e-3495-4c5f-8de3-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Zanoli, Raffaele & Naspetti, Simona, 2002. "Consumer motivations in the purchase of organic food. A means-end approach," MPRA Paper 32712, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Jürgen Neumann, 2021. "When Biased Ratings Benefit the Consumer - An Economic Analysis of Online Ratings in Markets with Variety-Seeking Consumers," Working Papers Dissertations 77, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    10. Charles E. Gengler & Michael S. Mulvey, 2017. "Planning pre-launch positioning: Segmentation via willingness-to-pay and means-end brand differentiators," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(3), pages 230-249, May.
    11. Nagengast, Liane & Evanschitzky, Heiner & Blut, Markus & Rudolph, Thomas, 2014. "New Insights in the Moderating Effect of Switching Costs on the Satisfaction–Repurchase Behavior Link," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(3), pages 408-427.
    12. Pradip H. Sadarangani & Anup Krishnamurthy & Richard P. Bagozzi, 2017. "Shared Consumer Needs Across India and China: A Path to Global Advertising of Services?," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 473-500, June.
    13. Do-Hyung Park, 2019. "Virtuality Changes Consumer Preference: The Effect of Transaction Virtuality as Psychological Distance on Consumer Purchase Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-16, November.
    14. Barrenar, Ramo & García, Teresa & Camarena, María, 2015. "An Analysis of the Decision Structure for Food Innovation on the Basis of Consumer Age," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(3), pages 1-22, September.
    15. Pham Ngoc Thuy & Le Nguyen Hau & Felicitas Evangelista, 2016. "Service value and switching barriers: a personal values perspective," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3-4), pages 142-162, February.
    16. Grunert, Klaus G. & Lähteenmäki, Liisa & Nielsen, Niels A. & Poulsen, Jacob B. & Ueland, Oydis & Åström, Annika, 2000. "Consumer perception of food products involving genetic modification: Results from a qualitative study in four Nordic countries," MAPP Working Papers 72, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, The MAPP Centre.
    17. Kim, Gwia & Jin, Byoungho & Shin, Daeun Chloe, 2022. "Virtual reality as a promotion tool for small independent stores," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    18. Ya-Cing Jhan & Pin Luarn & Hong-Wen Lin, 2022. "Individual Differences in Digital Game-Based Supply Chains Management Learning: Evidence from Higher Vocational Education in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-22, April.
    19. Cheng-Shih Lin & Mei-Yuan Jeng & Tsu-Ming Yeh, 2018. "The Elderly Perceived Meanings and Values of Virtual Reality Leisure Activities: A Means-End Chain Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, April.
    20. Heungsik Park & Wim Vandekerckhove & Jaeil Lee & Joowon Jeong, 2020. "Laddered Motivations of External Whistleblowers: The Truth About Attributes, Consequences, and Values," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(4), pages 565-578, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:20:y:2016:i:3:p:224-236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.