IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/toueco/v12y2006i3p451-468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correcting for Sample Selection Bias in Stated Preference Tourist Surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandros Apostolakis
  • Shabbar Jaffry

Abstract

This paper makes novel use of Heckman's sample selection methodology in modelling tourists' choices for cultural heritage attractions. The data used were collected as part of a discrete choice experiment which examined tourists' preferences for two heritage sites: the Knossos Palace and the Heraklion Archaeological Museum, both located on the island of Crete. In particular, the study addresses the possible discrepancies that may have arisen from the fact that the sample population may not have been random, but rather selected systematically as a result of the unobserved effect of the repeat visitation phenomenon. The empirical evidence presented suggests that the correction for sample selection provides a venue for further target audience selection for managers and policy makers. In particular, the main implication to emerge from the analysis is that the two heritage attractions, contrary to the general perception, are part of a tourism demand continuum. As a result, policy makers can capitalize on tourists' different perceptions in their promotion strategies for the two attractions by promoting the Heraklion Archaeological Museum to first-time visitors and the Knossos Palace to repeat visitors to Crete.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandros Apostolakis & Shabbar Jaffry, 2006. "Correcting for Sample Selection Bias in Stated Preference Tourist Surveys," Tourism Economics, , vol. 12(3), pages 451-468, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:toueco:v:12:y:2006:i:3:p:451-468
    DOI: 10.5367/000000006778493600
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5367/000000006778493600
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5367/000000006778493600?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Twan Huybers & Jeff Bennett, 2000. "Impact of the Environment on Holiday Destination Choices of Prospective UK Tourists: Implications for Tropical North Queensland," Tourism Economics, , vol. 6(1), pages 21-46, March.
    2. Randall, Alan, 1998. "Beyond the crucial experiment: mapping the performance characteristics of contingent valuation," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 197-206, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aline Chiabai & Stephen Platt & Wadim Strielkowski, 2014. "Eliciting Users' Preferences for Cultural Heritage and Tourism-Related E-Services: A Tale of Three European Cities," Tourism Economics, , vol. 20(2), pages 263-277, April.
    2. María M. Carballo & Jorge E. Araña & Carmelo J. León & Sergio Moreno-Gil, 2015. "Economic Valuation of Tourism Destination Image," Tourism Economics, , vol. 21(4), pages 741-759, August.
    3. Sheng-Ping Yang & Annette Ryerson, 2011. "Correcting for Selectivity Bias in the Estimation of Tourist Spending Surveys," Tourism Economics, , vol. 17(6), pages 1165-1179, December.
    4. Massimiliano Castellani & Pierpaolo Pattitoni & Laura Vici, 2015. "Pricing Visitor Preferences for Temporary Art Exhibitions," Tourism Economics, , vol. 21(1), pages 83-103, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rinaldo Brau, 2008. "Demand-Driven Sustainable Tourism? A Choice Modelling Analysis," Tourism Economics, , vol. 14(4), pages 691-708, December.
    2. Julien Milanesi, 2011. "Une histoire de la méthode d'évaluation contingente," Post-Print hal-01531153, HAL.
    3. Huybers, Twan & Bennett, Jeffrey W., 2000. "Cooperation And Competition In Tropical North Queensland's Nature-Based Tourism Industry," 2000 Conference (44th), January 23-25, 2000, Sydney, Australia 123667, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    4. Oppewal, Harmen & Huybers, Twan & Crouch, Geoffrey I., 2015. "Tourist destination and experience choice: A choice experimental analysis of decision sequence effects," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 467-476.
    5. Richard Carson & Nicholas Flores & Norman Meade, 2001. "Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 19(2), pages 173-210, June.
    6. Andreas Papatheodorou, 2003. "Modelling Tourism Development: A Synthetic Approach," Tourism Economics, , vol. 9(4), pages 407-430, December.
    7. Richard T. Carson, 2011. "Contingent Valuation," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2489.
    8. George Halkos & Panagiotis Stavros Aslanidis & Angelos Plataniotis & Phoebe Koundouri, 2024. "Global insights on Sustainable Development Goal 14: Reviewing willingness-to-pay levels for marine ecosystem protection and conservation," DEOS Working Papers 2416, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    9. Carmelo J. León & Jorge E. Araña & Matías González & Javier de León, 2014. "Tourists' Evaluation of Climate Change Risks in the Canary Islands: A Heterogeneous Response Modelling Approach," Tourism Economics, , vol. 20(4), pages 849-868, August.
    10. John C. Whitehead, 2024. "They doth protest too much, methinks: Reply to “Reply to Whitehead”," Working Papers 24-04, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University.
    11. Twan Huybers, 2003. "Modelling Short-Break Holiday Destination Choices," Tourism Economics, , vol. 9(4), pages 389-405, December.
    12. Whitehead, John C., 2016. "Plausible responsiveness to scope in contingent valuation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 17-22.
    13. Marangon, Francesco & Visintin, Francesca, 2007. "Rural landscape valuation in a cross-border region," Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 84.
    14. Massimiliano Castellani & Pierpaolo Pattitoni & Laura Vici, 2015. "Pricing Visitor Preferences for Temporary Art Exhibitions," Tourism Economics, , vol. 21(1), pages 83-103, February.
    15. Gelo, Dambala & Turpie, Jane, 2021. "Bayesian analysis of demand for urban green space: A contingent valuation of developing a new urban park," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    16. Hampicke, Ulrich, 2003. "Die monetäre Bewertung von Naturgütern zwischen ökonomischer Theorie und politischer Umsetzung," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 52(08), pages 1-11.
    17. Gonzalez, Juan Marcos & Loomis, John B. & Gonzalez-Caban, Armando, 2006. "Testing Welfare Measurement Gains of Combining Stated and Revealed Preferences Methods Using Count Data Models," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21203, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    18. Rinaldo Brau & D. Cao, 2005. "Uncovering the macrostructure of tourists' preferences. A choice experiment analysis of tourism demand to Sardinia," Working Paper CRENoS 200514, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
    19. Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel & Driha, Oana M. & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Sinha, Avik, 2020. "The effects of tourism and globalization over environmental degradation in developed countries," MPRA Paper 100092, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Takahiro Tsuge & Nisikawa Usio & Makiko Nakano, 2023. "Assessing the attractiveness of tourism resources in Noto using the best–worst scaling and discrete choice experiment methods: further utilization of satoyama and satoumi for tourism," International Journal of Economic Policy Studies, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 421-446, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:toueco:v:12:y:2006:i:3:p:451-468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.