IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v30y2025i3p711-729.html

‘Is There Anything Else You’d Like to Tell Us About Your Experience?’ Orientations Towards Listening to Open-Ended Survey Responses

Author

Listed:
  • Giselle Newton

    (The University of Queensland, Australia; UNSW Sydney, Australia)

  • Emma Kirby

    (UNSW Sydney, Australia)

  • Lukas Hofstätter

    (Carers NSW, Australia)

  • Sarah Judd-Lam

    (Carers NSW, Australia)

  • Louisa Smith

    (Deakin University, Australia)

  • Brendan Churchill

    (The University of Melbourne, Australia)

  • Iva Strnadová

    (UNSW Sydney, Australia)

  • Christy E Newman

    (UNSW Sydney, Australia)

Abstract

While survey research design tends to prioritise closed questions with predetermined responses, many surveys conclude with an open-ended ‘anything else you would like to tell us?’ question. This question, designed to elicit feedback or create opportunities for respondents to share additional information, offers significant potential for insight into respondents’ experiences. Yet, the extent to which these open-ended data are listened to remains opaque. In this article, we outline and reflect on our approach to a reflexive thematic analysis of responses to an open-ended survey question, to foreground listening. Drawing on responses ( n  = 1746) from a national survey of informal carers in Australia, we explore how the final ‘anything else?’ style question of a survey offers scope for fostering ongoing engagement (via survey feedback and context), recognising less visible experiences (through detailed personal accounts), and attending to respondents’ needs (via calls for attention and action). We discuss our approach to sociological listening , and the practicalities therein, including experiences of discomfort, and the challenges of responding to responses . In doing so, we argue that engagement with the data derived from open-ended survey responses is not only fruitful for generating feedback and contextualisation within self-administered survey design, but that such data also hold considerable opportunities for meaningful listening, particularly in contexts where respondents lack recognition and visibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Giselle Newton & Emma Kirby & Lukas Hofstätter & Sarah Judd-Lam & Louisa Smith & Brendan Churchill & Iva Strnadová & Christy E Newman, 2025. "‘Is There Anything Else You’d Like to Tell Us About Your Experience?’ Orientations Towards Listening to Open-Ended Survey Responses," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 30(3), pages 711-729, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:30:y:2025:i:3:p:711-729
    DOI: 10.1177/13607804241287628
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13607804241287628
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/13607804241287628?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruth Mayne & Duncan Green & Irene Guijt & Martin Walsh & Richard English & Paul Cairney, 2018. "Using evidence to influence policy: Oxfam’s experience," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Sevasti-Melissa Nolas & Vinnarasan Aruldoss & Christos Varvantakis, 2019. "Learning to Listen: Exploring the Idioms of Childhood," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 24(3), pages 394-413, September.
    3. Paula Devine & Gillian Robinson, 2014. "From Survey to Policy: Community Relations in Northern Ireland," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 19(1), pages 175-186, February.
    4. Chris Hastie, 2021. "The Perpetuation of Inequality: The Role of Community Engagement," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 26(3), pages 759-767, September.
    5. Graeme Hawthorne, 2006. "Measuring Social Isolation in Older Adults: Development and Initial Validation of the Friendship Scale," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 77(3), pages 521-548, July.
    6. repec:plo:pone00:0068832 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Jane Fielding & Nigel Fielding & Graham Hughes, 2013. "Opening up open-ended survey data using qualitative software," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 3261-3276, October.
    8. Abraham, Traci H. & Deen, Tisha L. & Hamilton, Michelle & True, Gala & O’Neil, Marie T. & Blanchard, Jessica & Uddo, Madeline, 2020. "Analyzing free-text survey responses: An accessible strategy for developing patient-centered programs and program evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alpes, Maybritt Jill, 2024. "Smuggling critique into impact: Research design principles for critical and actionable migration research," SocArXiv mzy8h, Center for Open Science.
    2. Heidi Reed, 2024. "“When money is more valuable than people…”: The pandemic as a call for business to care," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 435-455, March.
    3. Ooms, Tahnee & Klaser, Klaudijo & Ishkanian, Armine, 2023. "The role of academia practice partnerships in the well-being economy: Retracing synergies between health and social sciences using bibliometric analysis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    4. Jane Marshall & Tracey Booth & Niamh Devane & Julia Galliers & Helen Greenwood & Katerina Hilari & Richard Talbot & Stephanie Wilson & Celia Woolf, 2016. "Evaluating the Benefits of Aphasia Intervention Delivered in Virtual Reality: Results of a Quasi-Randomised Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Heidi Reed, 2023. "“When money is more valuable than people…”: The pandemic as a call for business to care," Post-Print hal-04461114, HAL.
    6. Shathees Baskaran & Ng Chun Howe & Nomahaza Mahadi & Salahuddin Ahmad Ayob, 2017. "Youth and Social Media Comportment: A Conceptual Perspective," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(11), pages 1260-1277, November.
    7. Daniel Arturo Cernas-Ortiz & Lau Wai-Kwan, 2021. "Social connectedness and job satisfaction in Mexican teleworkers during the pandemic: the mediating role of affective well-being," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, vol. 37(158), pages 37-48.
    8. Leal-Rodríguez, Antonio L. & Ariza-Montes, Antonio J. & Morales-Fernández, Emilio & Albort-Morant, Gema, 2018. "Green innovation, indeed a cornerstone in linking market requests and business performance. Evidence from the Spanish automotive components industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 185-193.
    9. Triss Ashton & Nicholas Evangelopoulos & Victor Prybutok, 2015. "Quantitative quality control from qualitative data: control charts with latent semantic analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 1081-1099, May.
    10. Nicola Döring & Melisa Conde & Karlheinz Brandenburg & Wolfgang Broll & Horst-Michael Gross & Stephan Werner & Alexander Raake, 2022. "Can Communication Technologies Reduce Loneliness and Social Isolation in Older People? A Scoping Review of Reviews," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-20, September.
    11. Jessica H. Phoenix & Lucy G. Atkinson & Hannah Baker, 2019. "Creating and communicating social research for policymakers in government," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-11, December.
    12. Teasdale, Rebecca M., 2022. "Representing the values of program participants: Endogenous evaluative criteria," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    13. Saeed A. Al-Haidan & Alaa M. S. Azazz & Ibrahim A. Elshaer, 2022. "Social Disconnectedness and Career Advancement Impact on Performance: The Role of Employees’ Satisfaction in the Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, April.
    14. repec:iab:iabfme:201410(en is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Schierholz, Malte, 2014. "Automating survey coding for occupation," FDZ Methodenreport 201410_en, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    16. Christian Imdorf & Matthias Pohlig, 2021. "La sélection sur le marché du travail selon les ruptures dans le parcours antérieur comparaison Suisse et Bulgarie," Post-Print halshs-03364147, HAL.
    17. Yi Ran & Yuanyuan Hu & Shouming Chen & Fangjun Qiu & Ahmed Rabeeu, 2022. "The Impact of Two-Invoice System on Pharmaceutical Manufacturers’ Selling Expenses in China: A Difference-in-Differences Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-18, April.
    18. Shen, Jie & Wajeeh-ul-Husnain, Syed & Kang, Haiying & Jin, Quan, 2021. "Effect of outgroup social categorization by host-country nationals on expatriate premature return intention and buffering effect of mentoring," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(2).
    19. Saba Hinrichs-Krapels & Jocelyn Bailey & Harriet Boulding & Bobby Duffy & Rachel Hesketh & Emma Kinloch & Alexandra Pollitt & Sarah Rawlings & Armida Rij & Benedict Wilkinson & Ross Pow & Jonathan Gra, 2020. "Using Policy Labs as a process to bring evidence closer to public policymaking: a guide to one approach," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-9, December.
    20. Merchant, Altaf & Ford, John B. & Rose, Gregory, 2011. "How personal nostalgia influences giving to charity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(6), pages 610-616, June.
    21. Shah, Ritesh & Cardozo, Mieke Lopes & Hjarrand, Jessica, 2024. "Learning as ecosystems: Shifting paradigms for more holistic programming in education and displacement," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:30:y:2025:i:3:p:711-729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.