IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/revmar/v13y2021i2-3p124-153.html

Some searches may not work properly. We apologize for the inconvenience.

   My bibliography  Save this article

An Empirical Study on the Corporate Social Responsibility Regime in India: Pre-COVID and COVID Times

Author

Listed:
  • Varun Garg
  • Sakshi Agarwal

Abstract

Companies have shown social responsibility towards their stakeholders through corporate philanthropic efforts, known as Corporate Social Responsibility (‘CSR’). These efforts aim to maximise the welfare of the stakeholders and take care of the needs of society. The parent legislation for the Indian companies, that is, the Companies Act, brought a paradigm shift in 2013 when it mandated certain companies to spend mandatorily on CSR activities. Since then, the CSR legislation has been subject to frequent changes through amendments and clarifications. Various changes were brought to CSR policies in the past 2 years during COVID-19, including allocation of CSR funds towards COVID-19 relief funds, carry forward of excessive CSR expenditure and 100% tax deduction on COVID-19-related activities. This has affected how companies allocate their CSR funds. To study this change, this empirical study analyses the shifts in CSR expenditure of the top 25 companies of the Fortune 500 list in pre-COVID-19 financial year 2017–2018 and COVID-19 hit financial year 2020–2021. The study uses a secondary data collection method, that is, self-reported annual reports, to arrive at ratios given as percentages or fractions, and a comparison is made across the two periods. The authors deliberate upon the limitations of the CSR regime as revealed by the COVID-19 pandemic and address questions relating to the CSR regime’s efficiency in providing societal good. Furthermore, the authors study the modified CSR expenditure pattern adopted by several companies consequent of COVID-19. This study concludes by offering recommendations that strive to inspire a more sustainable, efficient and pragmatic CSR regime in India. JEL Classification: G39, D22, M14

Suggested Citation

  • Varun Garg & Sakshi Agarwal, 2021. "An Empirical Study on the Corporate Social Responsibility Regime in India: Pre-COVID and COVID Times," Review of Market Integration, India Development Foundation, vol. 13(2-3), pages 124-153, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:revmar:v:13:y:2021:i:2-3:p:124-153
    DOI: 10.1177/09749292221093835
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09749292221093835
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09749292221093835?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hans B. Christensen & Luzi Hail & Christian Leuz, 2021. "Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1176-1248, September.
    2. Francis Kuriakose, 2022. "Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility in India: A Composite Indicator Model," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 15(2), pages 295-320, December.
    3. Robin Burgess & Rohini Pande & Grace Wong, 2005. "Banking for the Poor: Evidence From India," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 3(2-3), pages 268-278, 04/05.
    4. Richard Welford & Stephen Frost, 2006. "Corporate social responsibility in Asian supply chains," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(3), pages 166-176, July.
    5. Ashutosh Verma & C.V.R.S. Vijaya Kumar, 2014. "An Analysis of CSR Expenditure by Indian Companies," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 7(2), pages 82-94, July.
    6. Maignan, Isabelle & Ferrell, O. C., 2001. "Antecedents and benefits of corporate citizenship: an investigation of French businesses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 37-51, January.
    7. Fortune Ganda & Khazamula Samson Milondzo, 2018. "The Impact of Carbon Emissions on Corporate Financial Performance: Evidence from the South African Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-22, July.
    8. Manish Kumar Dwivedi & Vineet Kumar, 2021. "Impact of lockdown and CSR activities undertaken by the corporates during COVID-19 in India," International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 22(4), pages 558-589.
    9. Claudia Eger & Graham Miller & Caroline Scarles, 2019. "Corporate Philanthropy Through the Lens of Ethical Subjectivity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(1), pages 141-153, April.
    10. Ramendra Singh & Madhupa Bakshi & Prashant Mishra, 2015. "Corporate Social Responsibility: Linking Bottom of the Pyramid to Market Development?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 361-373, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diane Coffey & Ashwini Deshpande & Jeffrey Hammer & Dean Spears, 2019. "Local Social Inequality, Economic Inequality, and Disparities in Child Height in India," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 56(4), pages 1427-1452, August.
    2. Andrew Ngawenja Mzembe & Adam Lindgreen & François Maon & Joëlle Vanhamme, 2016. "Investigating the Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Global Tea Supply Chain: A Case Study of Eastern Produce Limited in Malawi," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(3), pages 165-178, May.
    3. Zhang, Dongyang, 2023. "Does green finance really inhibit extreme hypocritical ESG risk? A greenwashing perspective exploration," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    4. Bert Scholtens & Feng‐Ching Kang, 2013. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Earnings Management: Evidence from Asian Economies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), pages 95-112, March.
    5. Singh, Nirvikar, 2018. "Financial Inclusion: Concepts, Issues and Policies for India," MPRA Paper 91047, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Alexander Dahlsrud, 2008. "How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, January.
    7. Jiang, Wei & Zhang, Cheng & Si, Chengyu, 2022. "The real effect of mandatory CSR disclosure: Evidence of corporate tax avoidance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    8. Cedric Dawkins, 2010. "Beyond Wages and Working Conditions: A Conceptualization of Labor Union Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 95(1), pages 129-143, August.
    9. Fu Jia & Yan Jiang, 2018. "Sustainable Global Sourcing: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-26, February.
    10. Teresa Eugénio & Sónia Gomes & Manuel Castelo Branco & Ana Isabel Morais, 2022. "Non-Financial Reporting and Assurance: A New Opportunity for Auditors? Evidence from Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    11. Siying Cai & Wenzhong Zhu & Yuting Wang, 2023. "Corpus analysis of evaluative language and framework implementation for pharmaceutical industry CSR reports," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 2037-2052, July.
    12. Yusup Hidayat, 2019. "Sharia Economics and Financial Inclusion Program in Indonesia," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 8, November.
    13. Galbreath, Jeremy, 2017. "Drivers Of Environmental Sustainability In Wine Firms: The Role And Effect Of Women In Leadership," Working Papers 253851, American Association of Wine Economists.
    14. Ravi Kanbur, 2017. "Informality: Causes, consequences and policy responses," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(4), pages 939-961, November.
    15. Laura Maria Ferri & Nelly Oelze & André Habisch & Mario Molteni, 2016. "Implementation of responsible Procurement Management: An Institutional Perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 261-276, May.
    16. Daliborka Blazheska & Ljupka Naumovska, 2016. "Socially Responsible Activities - An Efficient Tool for the Companies for Marketing Communication with the Consumers," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 6(3), pages 10-18, July.
    17. Rieger-Fels, Markus & Schlepphorst, Susanne & Dienes, Christian & Akalan, Rodi & Icks, Annette & Wolter, Hans-Jürgen, 2024. "Die unternehmerische Akzeptanz von Klimaschutzregulierung," IfM-Materialien 305, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    18. Tronzano, Marco, 2011. "“Finance and Growth: A Reassessment of the Empirical Evidence for the Indian Economy” - Finanza e crescita: un riesame dell’evidenza empirica nel caso dell’India," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 64(3), pages 329-364.
    19. Eliza IRIMIA (DUMITRAªCU) & Silvia STÃNOIU, 2013. "Social Responsibility in the Context of Company Performance," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 175-183, March.
    20. Salih Börteçine Avci & Adnan Karataş, 2022. "Public Service Motivation’s Mediating Role in the Effect Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Justice Have on Organizational Commitment in Higher Education Institutions," Journal of Economy Culture and Society, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 66(66), pages 29-54, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Corporate social responsibility; empirical study; COVID-19; annual reports; CSR committee;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G39 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Other
    • D22 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:revmar:v:13:y:2021:i:2-3:p:124-153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.idfresearch.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.