IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/reorpe/v12y1981i4p1-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structure and Practice in the Labor Theory of Value

Author

Listed:
  • Herbert Gintis
  • Samuel Bowles

Abstract

The Marxian labor theory of value has been criticized in recent years by neoclassical and Sraffian economists as superfluous to the analysis of capitalist economies. It is argued in this paper the usual presentations and de fenses of the labor theory of value are indeed faulty, but the theory itself is never theless indispensable. We develop a defense of the labor theory of value based on the proposition that both labor and labor-power fail to reduce to generalized commodity relations.

Suggested Citation

  • Herbert Gintis & Samuel Bowles, 1981. "Structure and Practice in the Labor Theory of Value," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 12(4), pages 1-26, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:12:y:1981:i:4:p:1-26
    DOI: 10.1177/048661348101200401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/048661348101200401
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/048661348101200401?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Humphries, Jane, 1977. "Class Struggle and the Persistence of the Working-Class Family," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 1(3), pages 241-258, September.
    2. Himmelweit, Susan & Mohun, Simon, 1977. "Domestic Labour and Capital," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 15-31, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Takao Fujimoto & Yukihiko Fujita, 2008. "A Refutation Of The Commodity Exploitation Theorem," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 530-540, July.
    2. Tadasu Matsuo, 2008. "Profit, Surplus Product, Exploitation And Less Than Maximized Utility: A New Equivalence Proposition On The Fundamental Marxian Theorem," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(2), pages 249-265, May.
    3. Veneziani, Roberto & Yoshihara, Naoki, 2014. "One Million Miles to Go: Taking the Axiomatic Road to Defining Exploitation," Discussion Paper Series 615, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    4. PARYS, Wilfried, 2018. "Labour values and energy values," Working Papers 2018006, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    5. Theodore Mariolis & George Soklis & Eugenia Zouvela, 2013. "Testing Böhm-Bawerk’s theory of capital: Some evidence from the Finnish economy," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 26(2), pages 207-220, June.
    6. Howard Sherman, 2002. "Marxist Institutionalism," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(4), pages 603-608.
    7. Naoki Yoshihara, 2017. "A Progress Report On Marxian Economic Theory: On The Controversies In Exploitation Theory Since Okishio (1963)," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 1421-1448, December.
    8. Howard J. Sherman, 1990. "Cyclical Behavior of the Labor Share," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 22(2-3), pages 92-112, June.
    9. Gilbert L. Skillman, 2017. "Marx’s Capital through the lens of Roemer’s General Theory (and vice-versa)," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 49(3), pages 423-443, December.
    10. Spencer, David A, 2000. "The Demise of Radical Political Economics? An Essay on the Evolution of a Theory of Capitalist Production," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 24(5), pages 543-564, September.
    11. Adolfo Rodríguez Herrera, 2021. "Productive and unproductive labor: Marx´s positions on personal services," Working Papers 202103, Universidad de Costa Rica, revised Mar 2021.
    12. Veneziani, Roberto & Yoshihara, Naoki, 2011. "Exploitation of Labour and Exploitation of Commodities: a “New Interpretation”," MPRA Paper 34650, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Yoshihara, Naoki, 2014. "A Progressive Report on Marxian Economic Theory: On the Controversies in Exploitation Theory since Okishio (1963)," Discussion Paper Series 607, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    14. Yoshihara, Naoki, 2010. "Class and exploitation in general convex cone economies," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 281-296, August.
    15. repec:ums:papers:2014-010 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Takao Fujimoto & Arrigo Opocher, 2010. "Commodity Content In A General Input–Output Model," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 442-453, July.
    17. François Combarnous, 1994. "Discrimination et marché du travail : concepts et théories," Documents de travail 02, Groupe d'Economie du Développement de l'Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gillian Hewitson, 2001. "A Survey of Feminist Economics," Working Papers 2001.01, School of Economics, La Trobe University.
    2. Ellen Mutari, 2001. ""...As broad as our life experience": visions of feminist political economy, 1972-1991," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 33(4), pages 379-399, December.
    3. Amartya Sen, 1987. "Gender and Cooperative Conflicts," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-1987-018, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    4. Marina Sánchez, 2015. "De la reproducción económica a la sostenibilidad de la vida," Revista de Economía Crítica, Asociación de Economía Crítica, vol. 19, pages 58-76.
    5. Biesecker, Adelheid & Hofmeister, Sabine, 2010. "Focus: (Re)productivity: Sustainable relations both between society and nature and between the genders," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 1703-1711, June.
    6. Hassan Hakimian, 1988. "Industrialization and the Standard of Living of the Working Class in Iran, 1960–79," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 19(1), pages 3-32, January.
    7. Jane Humphries, 1977. "The Working Class Family, Women's Liberation, and Class Struggle: The Case of Nineteenth Century British History," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 9(3), pages 25-41, October.
    8. Beneria L., 1978. "Reproduction, production and the sexual division of labour," ILO Working Papers 991787383402676, International Labour Organization.
    9. Herman Knudsen & Michael Richardson & Tony Royle & Matthew Cole & Gill Kirton & David Ashton & Michael Rowlinson, 2002. "Book Reviews," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 16(3), pages 557-572, September.
    10. Nina Banks, 2006. "Uplifting The Race Through Domesticity: Capitalism, African-American Migration, And The Household Economy In The Great Migration Era Of 1916—1930," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 599-624.
    11. Rose Brewer & Cecilia Conrad & Mary King, 2002. "The Complexities and Potential of Theorizing Gender, Caste, Race, and Class," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 3-17.
    12. Simon Deakin & Frank Wilkinson, 2000. "Capabilities, Spontaneous Order, And Social Rights," Working Papers wp174, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    13. Motkuri, Venkatanarayana, 2004. "Child Labour and Schooling in a Histrical Perspective: The Developed Countries Experience," MPRA Paper 48416, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Zdravka Todorova, 2015. "A Veblenian articulation of the monetary theory of production," Working Papers PKWP1501, Post Keynesian Economics Society (PKES).
    15. Giovanna Vertova, 2014. "What’s gender got to do with the Great Recession? The Italian case," Chapters, in: Riccardo Bellofiore & Giovanna Vertova (ed.), The Great Recession and the Contradictions of Contemporary Capitalism, chapter 11, pages 189-207, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Kanchana N Ruwanpura, 2023. "Frayed social safety: Social networks, stigma, and COVID-19 – The case of Sri Lankan garment workers," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(7), pages 1317-1332, November.
    17. Linda McDowell, 2016. "Reflections on feminist economic geography: Talking to ourselves?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(10), pages 2093-2099, October.
    18. Michael Richardson, 2002. "Book Reviews," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 16(3), pages 560-562, September.
    19. Armanda Cetrulo & Dario Guarascio & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2024. "Two neglected origins of inequality: hierarchical power and care work," LEM Papers Series 2024/04, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    20. Wainerman, Catalina., 1992. "Improving the accounting of women workers in population censuses : lessons from Latin America," ILO Working Papers 992858403402676, International Labour Organization.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:12:y:1981:i:4:p:1-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.urpe.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.