IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/metroe/v59y2008i3p530-540.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Refutation Of The Commodity Exploitation Theorem

Author

Listed:
  • Takao Fujimoto
  • Yukihiko Fujita

Abstract

This note is to show that the generalized commodity exploitation theorem put forward by Bowles and Gintis and Roemer is nothing but an alternative form of the Hawkins–Simon condition for given technical data, and that it has nothing to do with exploitation. That is, the Hawkins–Simon condition means a mere possibility of an economic system to produce a surplus in each commodity, and as such does not guarantee the existence of positive profits. To consider exploitation or the existence of positive profits, we need to introduce prices at which unequal exchanges may be carried out.

Suggested Citation

  • Takao Fujimoto & Yukihiko Fujita, 2008. "A Refutation Of The Commodity Exploitation Theorem," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 530-540, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:metroe:v:59:y:2008:i:3:p:530-540
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-999X.2008.00317.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-999X.2008.00317.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-999X.2008.00317.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeong, Ki-Jun, 1982. "Direct and indirect requirements: A correct economic interpretation of the Hawkins-Simon conditions," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 349-356.
    2. Herbert Gintis & Samuel Bowles, 1981. "Structure and Practice in the Labor Theory of Value," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 12(4), pages 1-26, January.
    3. Fujita, Yukihiko, 1991. "A further note on a correct economic interpretation of the Hawkins-Simon conditions," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 381-384.
    4. Jeong, Ki-Jun, 1984. "The relation between two different notions of direct and indirect input requirements," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 6(4), pages 473-476.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roberto Veneziani & Naoki Yoshihara, 2010. "Exploitation and Productiveness: The Generalised Commodity Exploitation Theorem Once Again," Bulletin of Political Economy, Bulletin of Political Economy, vol. 4(1), pages 45-58, June.
    2. Roberto Veneziani & Naoki Yoshihara, 2015. "Exploitation in economies with heterogeneous preferences, skills and assets: An axiomatic approach," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 27(1), pages 8-33, January.
    3. PARYS, Wilfried, 2018. "Labour values and energy values," Working Papers 2018006, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    4. Naoki Yoshihara, 2017. "A Progress Report On Marxian Economic Theory: On The Controversies In Exploitation Theory Since Okishio (1963)," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 1421-1448, December.
    5. Takao Fujimoto & Arrigo Opocher, 2010. "Commodity Content In A General Input–Output Model," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 442-453, July.
    6. Naoki Yoshihara & Roberto Veneziani, 2010. "Commodity Content In A General Input–Output Model: A Comment," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 740-748, November.
    7. Deepankar Basu, 2023. "Exploitation of Labor or Exploitation of Commodities?," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 55(2), pages 233-250, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Takao Fujimoto & Arrigo Opocher, 2010. "Commodity Content In A General Input–Output Model," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 442-453, July.
    2. Lenzen, Manfred & Murray, Joy & Sack, Fabian & Wiedmann, Thomas, 2007. "Shared producer and consumer responsibility -- Theory and practice," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 27-42, February.
    3. Erik Dietzenbacher & Manfred Lenzen & Bart Los & Dabo Guan & Michael L. Lahr & Ferran Sancho & Sangwon Suh & Cuihong Yang, 2013. "Input--Output Analysis: The Next 25 Years," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 369-389, December.
    4. J M Szyrmer, 1992. "Input—Output Coefficients and Multipliers from a Total-Flow Perspective," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 24(7), pages 921-937, July.
    5. Tadasu Matsuo, 2008. "Profit, Surplus Product, Exploitation And Less Than Maximized Utility: A New Equivalence Proposition On The Fundamental Marxian Theorem," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(2), pages 249-265, May.
    6. Veneziani, Roberto & Yoshihara, Naoki, 2014. "One million miles to go: taking the axiomatic road to defining exploitation," UMASS Amherst Economics Working Papers 2014-10, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Economics.
    7. Howard Sherman, 2002. "Marxist Institutionalism," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(4), pages 603-608.
    8. Naoki Yoshihara, 2017. "A Progress Report On Marxian Economic Theory: On The Controversies In Exploitation Theory Since Okishio (1963)," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 1421-1448, December.
    9. Spencer, David A, 2000. "The Demise of Radical Political Economics? An Essay on the Evolution of a Theory of Capitalist Production," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 24(5), pages 543-564, September.
    10. Yoshihara, Naoki & 吉原, 直毅 & ヨシハラ, ナオキ & Roberto Veneziani, 2011. "Exploitation of Labour and Exploitation of Commodities: A "New Interpretation"," Discussion Paper Series 556, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    11. Ferran Sancho, 2012. "Straightening out the concept of direct and indirect input requirements," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 32(1), pages 502-509.
    12. David Font Vivanco & Ranran Wang & Edgar Hertwich, 2018. "Nexus Strength: A Novel Metric for Assessing the Global Resource Nexus," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(6), pages 1473-1486, December.
    13. PARYS, Wilfried, 2018. "Labour values and energy values," Working Papers 2018006, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    14. Theodore Mariolis & George Soklis & Eugenia Zouvela, 2013. "Testing Böhm-Bawerk’s theory of capital: Some evidence from the Finnish economy," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 26(2), pages 207-220, June.
    15. Gilbert L. Skillman, 2017. "Marx’s Capital through the lens of Roemer’s General Theory (and vice-versa)," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 49(3), pages 423-443, December.
    16. Yoshihara, Naoki, 2010. "Class and exploitation in general convex cone economies," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 281-296, August.
    17. repec:ums:papers:2014-010 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. repec:dgr:rugggd:gd-132 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Howard J. Sherman, 1990. "Cyclical Behavior of the Labor Share," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 22(2-3), pages 92-112, June.
    20. Adolfo Rodríguez Herrera, 2021. "Productive and unproductive labor: Marx´s positions on personal services," Working Papers 202103, Universidad de Costa Rica, revised Mar 2021.
    21. Yoshihara, Naoki, 2014. "A Progressive Report on Marxian Economic Theory: On the Controversies in Exploitation Theory since Okishio (1963)," Discussion Paper Series 607, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    22. François Combarnous, 1994. "Discrimination et marché du travail : concepts et théories," Documents de travail 02, Groupe d'Economie du Développement de l'Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:metroe:v:59:y:2008:i:3:p:530-540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0026-1386 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.