IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ratsoc/v37y2025i1p35-64.html

Beliefs, strategic interaction, and Hong Kong’s anti-extradition law movement: A game-theoretic analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Theodore Charm

Abstract

Given the information and beliefs about the possibility of repression, when will the civil society organize protests against the government? Under what conditions will the government repress popular protests? In this paper, I employ a novel signaling game to model the strategic interaction between the regime and civil society during the 2019 Anti-Extradition Law Movement in Hong Kong. I illustrate how information and beliefs influence whether the civil society mobilizes mass protests. Specifically, I examine how government actions shape the civil society’s beliefs about the government type, which in turn determine the protest turnouts and the government’s decision to repress.

Suggested Citation

  • Theodore Charm, 2025. "Beliefs, strategic interaction, and Hong Kong’s anti-extradition law movement: A game-theoretic analysis," Rationality and Society, , vol. 37(1), pages 35-64, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:37:y:2025:i:1:p:35-64
    DOI: 10.1177/10434631241274899
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10434631241274899
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10434631241274899?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lorentzen, Peter L., 2013. "Regularizing Rioting: Permitting Public Protest in an Authoritarian Regime," Quarterly Journal of Political Science, now publishers, vol. 8(2), pages 127-158, February.
    2. Shadmehr, Mehdi & Bernhardt, Dan, 2017. "When Can Citizen Communication Hinder Successful Revolution?," Quarterly Journal of Political Science, now publishers, vol. 12(3), pages 301-323, October.
    3. Brandon Ives & Jacob S. Lewis, 2020. "From Rallies to Riots: Why Some Protests Become Violent," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 64(5), pages 958-986, May.
    4. Amy Yunyu Chiang, 2021. "Violence, non-violence and the conditional effect of repression on subsequent dissident mobilization," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 38(6), pages 627-653, November.
    5. Gordon Tullock, 1971. "The paradox of revolution," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 89-99, September.
    6. repec:ehl:lserod:100316 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Mehdi Shadmehr, 2021. "Protest Puzzles: Tullock's Paradox, Hong Kong Experiment, and the Strength of Weak States," Quarterly Journal of Political Science, now publishers, vol. 16(3), pages 245-264, July.
    8. Travis B. Curtice & Brandon Behlendorf, 2021. "Street-level Repression: Protest, Policing, and Dissent in Uganda," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 65(1), pages 166-194, January.
    9. Sargis Karavardanyan, 2021. "Are Actions Costlier Than Words? Formal Models of Protester-Police Dynamic Interactions and Evidence from Empirical Analysis," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 2(4), pages 1-29, December.
    10. Davide Cantoni & David Y Yang & Noam Yuchtman & Y Jane Zhang, 2019. "Protests as Strategic Games: Experimental Evidence from Hong Kong's Antiauthoritarian Movement," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 134(2), pages 1021-1077.
    11. Björn Toelstede, 2020. "Social hierarchies in democracies and authoritarianism: The balance between power asymmetries and principal-agent chains," Rationality and Society, , vol. 32(3), pages 334-366, August.
    12. Robert Carroll & Amy Pond, 2021. "Costly signaling in autocracy," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 612-632, July.
    13. Christensen, Darin & Garfias, Francisco, 2018. "Can You Hear Me Now? How Communication Technology Affects Protest and Repression," Quarterly Journal of Political Science, now publishers, vol. 13(1), pages 89-117, March.
    14. Olga V. Chyzh & Elena Labzina, 2018. "Bankrolling Repression? Modeling Third‐Party Influence on Protests and Repression," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(2), pages 312-324, April.
    15. Leuschner, Elena & Hellmeier, Sebastian, 2024. "State Concessions and Protest Mobilization in Authoritarian Regimes," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 57(1), pages 3-31.
    16. De Mesquita, Ethan Bueno, 2010. "Regime Change and Revolutionary Entrepreneurs," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 104(3), pages 446-466, August.
    17. Gary Shiu & Daniel Sutter, 1996. "The Political Economy Of Tiananmen Square," Rationality and Society, , vol. 8(3), pages 325-342, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boris Ginzburg & JosÔøΩ-Alberto Guerra, 2021. "Guns, pets, and strikes: an experiment on identity and political action," Documentos CEDE 19932, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    2. Canen, Nathan & Chakraborty, Anujit, 2023. "Belief elicitation in political protest experiments: When the mode does not teach us about incentives to protest," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 320-331.
    3. repec:osf:osfxxx:85mjs_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Jarke-Neuert, Johannes & Perino, Grischa & Schwickert, Henrike, 2021. "Free-Riding for Future: Field Experimental Evidence of Strategic Substitutability in Climate Protest," SocArXiv sh6dm, Center for Open Science.
    5. Nathan Canen & Anujit Chakraborty, 2022. "Choosing The Best Incentives for Belief Elicitation with an Application to Political Protests," Papers 2210.12549, arXiv.org.
    6. Gomez-Ruiz, Marcela & Li Donni, Paolo & Marino, Maria, 2025. "Dynamics of protest: Understanding violent and nonviolent protest in Africa," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 90(PB).
    7. Tung, Hans, 2024. "Protests (An abridged version is forthcoming in the Encyclopedia of Experimental Social Science, Cheltenham and Camberley: Edward Elgar Publishing)," SocArXiv czgeb, Center for Open Science.
    8. Jacob S Lewis & Brandon Ives, 2025. "Repression, backlash, and the duration of protests in Africa," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(1), pages 21-35, January.
    9. repec:osf:socarx:czgeb_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Georgy Egorov & Konstantin Sonin, 2024. "The Political Economics of Non-democracy," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 62(2), pages 594-636, June.
    11. repec:osf:socarx:sh6dm_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. González, Felipe, 2020. "Collective action in networks: Evidence from the Chilean student movement," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    13. Cantoni, Davide & Heizlsperger, Louis-Jonas & Yang, David Y. & Yuchtman, Noam & Zhang, Y. Jane, 2022. "The fundamental determinants of protest participation: Evidence from Hong Kong’s antiauthoritarian movement," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    14. Luis R. Martinez & Jonas Jessen & Guo Xu, 2023. "A Glimpse of Freedom: Allied Occupation and Political Resistance in East Germany," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(1), pages 68-106, January.
    15. Abraham Aldama & Mateo Vásquez-Cortés & Lauren Elyssa Young, 2019. "Fear and citizen coordination against dictatorship," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 31(1), pages 103-125, January.
    16. Pierre Courtois & Rabia Nessah & Tarik Tazdaït, 2024. "Revolutions and rational choice: A critical discussion," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 200(3), pages 497-529, September.
    17. Louis Rouanet, 2024. "On the tendency of revolutions to devour their own children," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 200(3), pages 603-626, September.
    18. Shadmehr, Mehdi & Bernhardt, Dan, 2011. "Collective Action with Uncertain Payoffs: Coordination, Public Signals, and Punishment Dilemmas," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 105(4), pages 829-851, November.
    19. Gonzalez, Felipe & Prem, Mounu, 2020. "Police Repression and Protest Behavior: Evidence from Student Protests in Chile," SocArXiv 3xk5r, Center for Open Science.
    20. Apolte, Thomas, 2015. "Gordon Tullock's theory of dictatorship and revolution," CIW Discussion Papers 2/2015, University of Münster, Center for Interdisciplinary Economics (CIW).
    21. Paul Maarek & Michael Dorsch, 2012. "Inefficient Predation, Information, and Contagious Institutional Change," Thema Working Papers 2012-32, THEMA (Théorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), CY Cergy-Paris University, ESSEC and CNRS.
    22. Jose Morales-Arilla, 2025. "Autocrats in crisis mode: Strategic favoritism during economic shocks," Working Paper Series of the School of Government and Public Transformation 15, School of Governement and Public Transformation.
    23. Davide Cantoni & David Y. Yang & Noam Yuchtman & Y. Jane Zhang, 2017. "Are Protests Games of Strategic Complements or Substitutes? Experimental Evidence from Hong Kong's Democracy Movement," NBER Working Papers 23110, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:37:y:2025:i:1:p:35-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.