IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/fortra/v53y2018i1p49-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An RCA Analysis of India–China Trade Integration

Author

Listed:
  • Imran Ahmad
  • Mohd Hussain Kunroo
  • Irfan Ahmad Sofi

Abstract

The present study discusses the short- and long-run trade patterns of India and China. Applying revealed comparative advantage (RCA) and bilateral RCA, this study specifically tries to find out the pattern of exports and areas of specialization of the economies under study. Major findings suggest that both the countries have been performing well, in terms of merchandise trade exports, over the past few decades, especially since 2000. The export-performing behaviour of India and China with each other, as well as with the world, is seen quite general in nature. In other words, irrespective of their institutional and structural differences, both India and China maintain almost the same upward moving trend with respect to the flow of exports between them and that with the world market. However, once we go from Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) two-digit to SITC four-digit level of analysis, the sample economies reveal their specialized products. At the disaggregate level, India’s export basket is void of food products and raw materials, and it generally contains engineering goods and technologically driven products as advantageous products. The study finds that the areas of specialization are much wider, and the technology-embedded products are larger for China as compared to India. JEL: F10, F11, F43

Suggested Citation

  • Imran Ahmad & Mohd Hussain Kunroo & Irfan Ahmad Sofi, 2018. "An RCA Analysis of India–China Trade Integration," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 53(1), pages 49-58, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:fortra:v:53:y:2018:i:1:p:49-58
    DOI: 10.1177/0015732516681885
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0015732516681885
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0015732516681885?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eichengreen, Barry & Gupta, Poonam & Kumar, Rajiv (ed.), 2010. "Emerging Giants: China and India in the World Economy," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199575077, Decembrie.
    2. Wang, Qiang & Li, Rongrong, 2016. "Drivers for energy consumption: A comparative analysis of China and India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 954-962.
    3. Amita Batra & Zeba Khan, 2005. "Revealed comparative advantage: An analysis for India and China," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi Working Papers 168, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi, India.
    4. Przemyslaw Kowalski, "undated". "China and India: A Tale of Two Trade Integration Approaches," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi Working Papers 221, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi, India.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bagaria, Nidhi & Santra, Swarup & Kumar, Rajesh, 2014. "A study on variation in comparative advantage in trade between China and India," MPRA Paper 53287, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Zehra Vildan Serin & Seda Yeldan, 2023. "Determining the Competitiveness of Türkiye’s Selected Defense Products: A Revealed Comparative Advantage and Comparative Export Performance," Journal of Economic Policy Researches, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 10(2), pages 485-503, July.
    3. Zhang, Shulin & Su, Xiaoling & Singh, Vijay P & Ayantobo, Olusola Olaitan & Xie, Juan, 2018. "Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) decomposition analysis of changes in agricultural water use: a case study of the middle reaches of the Heihe River basin, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 422-430.
    4. Md. Monzur Hossain & Ankur Sarkar, 2025. "Bimstec’S Incipient Competitive Advantage And Trade Specialisation In Raw Sugar," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 70(244), pages 57-86, January –.
    5. Usman Ali & Faizan Ahmad & Lida Ormal, 2018. "Trade Compatibility between Afghanistan and India : An empirical Evaluation," Kardan Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, Kardan University, Department of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 11-12, January.
    6. Sun, Xiaoqi & Liu, Xiaojia, 2020. "Decomposition analysis of debt’s impact on China’s energy consumption," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    7. Nath, Hiranya K. & Liu, Lirong & Tochkov, Kiril, 2015. "Comparative advantages in U.S. bilateral services trade with China and India," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 79-92.
    8. Reema Bera & Bhargab Maitra, 2021. "Analyzing Prospective Owners’ Choice Decision towards Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles in Urban India: A Stated Preference Discrete Choice Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-24, July.
    9. Wang, Juan & Hu, Mingming & Rodrigues, João F.D., 2018. "The evolution and driving forces of industrial aggregate energy intensity in China: An extended decomposition analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 2195-2206.
    10. Min Su & Rui Jiang & Rongrong Li, 2017. "Investigating Low-Carbon Agriculture: Case Study of China’s Henan Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Rongrong Li & Xue-Ting Jiang, 2017. "Inequality of Carbon Intensity: Empirical Analysis of China 2000–2014," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-12, April.
    12. Wang, Miao & Feng, Chao, 2018. "Decomposing the change in energy consumption in China's nonferrous metal industry: An empirical analysis based on the LMDI method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2652-2663.
    13. Sun, Shuyu & Tong, Kangkang, 2024. "Rural-urban inequality in energy use sufficiency and efficiency during a rapid urbanization period," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 364(C).
    14. Lin Zhang & Philip Kofi Adom, 2018. "Energy Efficiency Transitions in China: How Persistent are the Movements to/from the Frontier?," The Energy Journal, , vol. 39(6), pages 147-170, November.
    15. Yawale, Satish Kumar & Hanaoka, Tatsuya & Kapshe, Manmohan & Pandey, Rahul, 2023. "End-use energy projections: Future regional disparity and energy poverty at the household level in rural and urban areas of India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    16. Lili Wang & Lina Zhan & Rongrong Li, 2019. "Prediction of the Energy Demand Trend in Middle Africa—A Comparison of MGM, MECM, ARIMA and BP Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
    17. Rui Jiang & Rongrong Li, 2017. "Decomposition and Decoupling Analysis of Life-Cycle Carbon Emission in China’s Building Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-18, May.
    18. Hafiz Wasim Akram & Alam Ahmad & Leo-Paul Dana & Asif Khan & Samreen Akhtar, 2024. "Do Trade Agreements Enhance Bilateral Trade? Focus on India and Sri Lanka," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-30, January.
    19. Biswajit Banerjee & Haiyan Shi & Jan Radovan & Yingying Sheng & Xin Li, 2017. "The Impact of the Exchange Rate and Trade Composition on China’s Trade Balance Vis-à-Vis Selected Partner Countries," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 59(3), pages 311-344, September.
    20. Farzan Yahya & Muhammad Rafiq, 2020. "Brownfield, greenfield, and renewable energy consumption: Moderating role of effective governance," Energy & Environment, , vol. 31(3), pages 405-423, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    India and China; trade integration; product specialization; exports; RCA;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F10 - International Economics - - Trade - - - General
    • F11 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Neoclassical Models of Trade
    • F43 - International Economics - - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance - - - Economic Growth of Open Economies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:fortra:v:53:y:2018:i:1:p:49-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.