IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v50y2026i2p256-278.html

External Validity for Complex Interventions: Towards Pragmatic Strategies for Evaluators

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Delahais

Abstract

Strategies for ensuring the generalizability of evaluation results often focus on building methodologically sound research designs. However, these strategies may fall short when the challenge lies as much in uncovering causal patterns than in applying them to uncertain contexts. This article proposes a set of pragmatic strategies to address generalizability issues in complex evaluations. These strategies address important questions such as: What needs to be generalized, for whom and for what purpose? What assumptions underlying the intervention could be generalized? How can approaches and methods be selected to support a generalization objective? How can potential users be involved to support the process of generalization? We illustrate these strategies using the example of a series of evaluations of bottom-up socio-ecological transition initiatives in France between 2013 and 2020. We suggest that these strategies can enhance policy learning and better equip policy stakeholders to navigate complex situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Delahais, 2026. "External Validity for Complex Interventions: Towards Pragmatic Strategies for Evaluators," Evaluation Review, , vol. 50(2), pages 256-278, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:50:y:2026:i:2:p:256-278
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X251343130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X251343130
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X251343130?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Woolcock, 2013. "Using Case Studies to Explore the External Validity of ‘Complex’ Development Interventions," CID Working Papers 270, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    2. Deaton, Angus & Cartwright, Nancy, 2018. "Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 2-21.
    3. Tom Ling, 2024. "Transferability of Lessons From Program Evaluations: Iron Laws, Hiding Hands and the Evidence Ecosystem," Evaluation Review, , vol. 48(3), pages 410-426, June.
    4. Douglas J. Besharov, 2024. "Program Evaluation’s Path to Greater Policy Relevance: Learning From Rossi’s Iron Laws," Evaluation Review, , vol. 48(3), pages 403-409, June.
    5. Burt S. Barnow & Sanjay K. Pandey & Qian “Eric†Luo, 2024. "How Mixed-Methods Research Can Improve the Policy Relevance of Impact Evaluations," Evaluation Review, , vol. 48(3), pages 495-514, June.
    6. Rebecca Maynard, 2024. "Improving the Usefulness and Use of Meta-Analysis to Inform Policy and Practice," Evaluation Review, , vol. 48(3), pages 515-543, June.
    7. Julia H. Littell, 2024. "The Logic of Generalization From Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Impact Evaluations," Evaluation Review, , vol. 48(3), pages 427-460, June.
    8. Woolcock, Michael, 2013. "Using Case Studies to Explore the External Validity of 'Complex' Development Interventions," Working Paper Series rwp13-048, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    9. Howard White, 2022. "Getting evidence into use: The experience of the Campbell Collaboration," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), March.
    10. Bédécarrats F (ed & Isabelle (ed.) Guérin & François (ed.) Roubaud, 2020. "Randomized control trials in the field of development : a critical perspective," Post-Print hal-03409465, HAL.
    11. Keeney, Ralph L., 1996. "Value-focused thinking: Identifying decision opportunities and creating alternatives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 537-549, August.
    12. Kelly Levin & Benjamin Cashore & Steven Bernstein & Graeme Auld, 2012. "Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 45(2), pages 123-152, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anne Revillard, 2026. "External Validity and Generalizability in Program Evaluation: Embracing Complexity," Evaluation Review, , vol. 50(2), pages 183-199, April.
    2. Jörg Peters & Jörg Langbein & Gareth Roberts, 2018. "Generalization in the Tropics – Development Policy, Randomized Controlled Trials, and External Validity," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 33(1), pages 34-64.
    3. Florence Jany‐Catrice, 2022. "A political economy of social impact measurement," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(2), pages 267-291, June.
    4. Florence JANY-CATRICE, 2020. "Une économie politique des mesures d’impact social," CIRIEC Working Papers 2014, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    5. Diana Dakhlallah, 2024. "Bribery in the Workplace: A Field Experiment on the Threat of Making Group Behavior Visible," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 1203-1223, July.
    6. Florent Bédécarrats & Isabelle Guérin & François Roubaud, 2019. "All that Glitters is not Gold. The Political Economy of Randomized Evaluations in Development," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 50(3), pages 735-762, May.
    7. Naritomi, Joana & Sequeira, Sandra & Weigel, Jonathan & Weinhold, Diana, 2020. "RCTs as an opportunity to promote interdisciplinary, inclusive, and diverse quantitative development research," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    8. Florent BEDECARRATS & Isabelle GUERIN & François ROUBAUD, 2017. "L'étalon-or des évaluations randomisées : économie politique des expérimentations aléatoires dans le domaine du développement," Working Paper 753120cd-506f-4c5f-80ed-7, Agence française de développement.
    9. Quentin Stoeffler & Michael Carter & Catherine Guirkinger & Wouter Gelade, 2022. "The Spillover Impact of Index Insurance on Agricultural Investment by Cotton Farmers in Burkina Faso," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 36(1), pages 114-140.
    10. Castaing, Pauline & Gazeaud, Jules, 2025. "Do index insurance programs live up to their promises? Aggregating evidence from multiple experiments," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    11. Arnaud Vaganay, 2016. "Cluster Sampling Bias in Government-Sponsored Evaluations: A Correlational Study of Employment and Welfare Pilots in England," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, August.
    12. Hakiman, Kamran & Sheely, Ryan, 2023. "Unlocking the Potential of Participatory Planning: How Flexible and Adaptive Governance Interventions Can Work in Practice," OSF Preprints kucjs, Center for Open Science.
    13. Quan Nha Hong & Sergi FÃ bregues, 2026. "A Critical Reflection of Generalization in Mixed Methods Research," Evaluation Review, , vol. 50(2), pages 200-230, April.
    14. Milante Gary & Woolcock Michael, 2017. "New Approaches to Identifying State Fragility," Journal of Globalization and Development, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, June.
    15. Woolcock, Michael, 2014. "Engaging with Fragile and Conflict-Affected States," Working Paper Series rwp14-038, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    16. Fatoumata Nankoto Cissé, 2022. "How impact evaluation methods influence the outcomes of development projects? Evidence from a meta-analysis on decentralized solar nano projects," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 22008, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    17. Ngoc Thi Minh Tran & Michael P. Cameron & Jacques Poot, 2019. "What are migrants willing to pay for better home country institutions?," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 257-268, December.
    18. Ton, Giel & Klerkx, Laurens & de Grip, Karin & Rau, Marie-Luise, 2015. "Innovation grants to smallholder farmers: Revisiting the key assumptions in the impact pathways," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 9-23.
    19. Cameron, Lisa & Olivia, Susan & Shah, Manisha, 2019. "Scaling up sanitation: Evidence from an RCT in Indonesia," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1-16.
    20. Fatoumata Nankoto Cissé, 2022. "How impact evaluation methods influence the outcomes of development projects? Evidence from a meta-analysis on decentralized solar nano projects," Post-Print halshs-03623394, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:50:y:2026:i:2:p:256-278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.