IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v50y2026i2p256-278.html

External Validity for Complex Interventions: Towards Pragmatic Strategies for Evaluators

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Delahais

Abstract

Strategies for ensuring the generalizability of evaluation results often focus on building methodologically sound research designs. However, these strategies may fall short when the challenge lies as much in uncovering causal patterns than in applying them to uncertain contexts. This article proposes a set of pragmatic strategies to address generalizability issues in complex evaluations. These strategies address important questions such as: What needs to be generalized, for whom and for what purpose? What assumptions underlying the intervention could be generalized? How can approaches and methods be selected to support a generalization objective? How can potential users be involved to support the process of generalization? We illustrate these strategies using the example of a series of evaluations of bottom-up socio-ecological transition initiatives in France between 2013 and 2020. We suggest that these strategies can enhance policy learning and better equip policy stakeholders to navigate complex situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Delahais, 2026. "External Validity for Complex Interventions: Towards Pragmatic Strategies for Evaluators," Evaluation Review, , vol. 50(2), pages 256-278, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:50:y:2026:i:2:p:256-278
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X251343130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X251343130
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X251343130?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:50:y:2026:i:2:p:256-278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.