IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v52y2025i2p339-354.html

Coordinating public intentions and predicted trend in regulatory decisions: A method for demarcation of UGBs

Author

Listed:
  • Zhu Chen
  • Hengzhou Xu

Abstract

Urban growth boundaries (UGBs) are commonly used for governance of urban growth. For demarcation of UGBs, the prediction models are prized for their automation and high efficiency in spatial data processing. However, public intentions, which cannot be predicted by prediction models, are ignored. This ignorance affects the performance of UGBs and urban development. From the perspective of regulatory tools, this article proposes public intentions and predicted trend as the two decisive elements for demarcation of UGBs. Following this thought, the study develops a method for coordination of their conflicts by providing a decision criteria for policy makers based on estimation of the cost to intervene predicted trend. This method is incorporated into a process of demarcation of UGBs and applied in the case of Tianjin, China. Results show that firstly, policy makers of UGBs should consider conflicts between public intentions and predicted trend and coordinate them for land development. Secondly, in the method for coordination, the decision criteria based on intervention costs can be used to make choice between public intentions and predicted trend and to choose suitable strategies for two types of conflicts. Thirdly, combined with the method for coordination, the process of demarcation is improved with multiple perspectives and methods for providing sufficient reference. Lastly in the case of Tianjin, China, it is verified that the decisions of land development and UGBs are made differently from the considerations of individual or public interests. To optimize the UGBs based on the method for coordination, four categories of strategies are matched with those conflict areas, and supporting measures are proposed correspondingly.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhu Chen & Hengzhou Xu, 2025. "Coordinating public intentions and predicted trend in regulatory decisions: A method for demarcation of UGBs," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 52(2), pages 339-354, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:52:y:2025:i:2:p:339-354
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083241259200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083241259200
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083241259200?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lichtenberg, Erik & Ding, Chengri, 2009. "Local officials as land developers: Urban spatial expansion in China," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 57-64, July.
    2. Wallace, Nancy E., 1988. "The market effects of zoning undeveloped land: Does zoning follow the market?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 307-326, May.
    3. Jiao Zhang & Danqing Li & Shuguang Ning & Katsunori Furuya, 2023. "Sustainable Urban Green Blue Space (UGBS) and Public Participation: Integrating Multisensory Landscape Perception from Online Reviews," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-29, July.
    4. Qing Su, 2020. "Urban Spatial Expansion, Urban Compactness, and Average Travel Demand in the US Urbanized Areas," International Journal of Regional Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 7(1), pages 1-1, December.
    5. Huang, Daquan & Huang, Jing & Liu, Tao, 2019. "Delimiting urban growth boundaries using the CLUE-S model with village administrative boundaries," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 422-435.
    6. Nancy Bockstael, 2008. "An Empirical Examination of the Timing of Land Conversions in the Presence of Farmland Preservation Programs," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 90(3), pages 613-626.
    7. Elena G. Irwin, 2002. "Interacting agents, spatial externalities and the evolution of residential land use patterns," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 2(1), pages 31-54, January.
    8. Ding, Chengri & Knaap, Gerrit J. & Hopkins, Lewis D., 1999. "Managing Urban Growth with Urban Growth Boundaries: A Theoretical Analysis," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 53-68, July.
    9. Turnbull, Geoffrey K., 2004. "Urban growth controls: transitional dynamics of development fees and growth boundaries," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 215-237, March.
    10. Jun Ren & Wei Zhou & Xuelu Liu & Liang Zhou & Jing Guo & Yonghao Wang & Yanjun Guan & Jingtian Mao & Yuhan Huang & Rongrong Ma, 2019. "Urban Expansion and Growth Boundaries in an Oasis City in an Arid Region: A Case Study of Jiayuguan City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    11. Van Butsic & David J. Lewis & Lindsay Ludwig, 2011. "An Econometric Analysis of Land Development with Endogenous Zoning," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 87(3), pages 412-432.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Van Butsic & David J. Lewis & Lindsay Ludwig, 2011. "An Econometric Analysis of Land Development with Endogenous Zoning," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 87(3), pages 412-432.
    2. Zipp, Katherine Y. & Lewis, David J. & Provencher, Bill, 2017. "Does the conservation of land reduce development? An econometric-based landscape simulation with land market feedbacks," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 19-37.
    3. Williamson, Samuel E., 2023. "Zoning with quantity restrictions for managing exurban development patterns," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 335866, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Newburn, David & Ferris, Jeffrey, 2014. "The Effect of Downzoning on Spatial Development Patterns," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 170446, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. repec:ags:aaea22:335866 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Villegas, Laura, 2019. "Integrating Econometric Models of Land Use Change with Models of Ecosystem Services and Landscape Simulations to Guide Coastal Management and Planning for Flood Control," EfD Discussion Paper 19-13, Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg.
    7. Wang, Haoluan, "undated". "Land Conservation for Open Space: The Impact of Neighbors and the Natural Environment," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258125, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Kent Kovacs, 2013. "An empirical examination of the location and timing of non-renewals in a farmland differential assessment program," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 50(1), pages 245-263, February.
    9. Towe, Charles A., 2010. "Testing the Effect of Neighboring Open Space on Development Using Propensity Score Matching," 2010 Annual Meeting, July 25-27, 2010, Denver, Colorado 61512, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Parker, Dawn Cassandra, 2007. "Revealing "space" in spatial externalities: Edge-effect externalities and spatial incentives," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 84-99, July.
    11. Lynch, Lori & Geoghegan, Jacqueline, 2011. "FOREWORD: The Economics of Land Use Change: Advancing the Frontiers," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 40(3), pages 1-6, December.
    12. Kane, Kevin & York, Abigail M., 2017. "Prices, policies, and place: What drives greenfield development?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 415-428.
    13. David A. Newburn & Peter Berck, 2006. "Modeling Suburban and Rural-Residential Development Beyond the Urban Fringe," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 82(4), pages 481-499.
    14. Wrenn, Douglas H. & Klaiber, Allen & Newburn, David, "undated". "Price-Based Policies for Managing Residential Land Development: Impacts on Water Quality," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258578, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Carmen Carrión-Flores & Elena G. Irwin, 2017. "A fixed effects logit model of rural land conversion and zoning," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 58(1), pages 181-208, January.
    16. Elena G. Irwin, 2010. "New Directions For Urban Economic Models Of Land Use Change: Incorporating Spatial Dynamics And Heterogeneity," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 65-91, February.
    17. Kovacs, Kent F., 2009. "The Timing of Rapid Farmland Conversion Events: Evidence from California's Differential Assessment Program," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49252, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Wrenn, Douglas H. & Klaiber, Allen & Newburn, David, "undated". "Price Based Policies for Managing Residential Development and Impacts on Water Quality," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274029, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Kaza, Nikhil & Towe, Charles & Ye, Xin, 2011. "A Hybrid Land Conversion Model Incorporating Multiple End Uses," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(3), pages 341-359, December.
    20. Douglas H. Wrenn & H. Allen Klaiber & David A. Newburn, 2017. "Confronting Price Endogeneity in a Duration Model of Residential Subdivision Development," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 661-682, April.
    21. Qiu, Yun & Gopalakrishnan, Sathya, 2016. "Defending the Shoreline: A Duration Model of Beach Re-Nourishment," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 236361, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:52:y:2025:i:2:p:339-354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.