IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v46y2019i4p603-625.html

Effects of spatial access to neighborhood land-use density on housing prices: Evidence from a multilevel hedonic analysis in Seoul, South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Chang-Deok Kang

Abstract

Attaining a mixture and diversity of land use within walkable neighborhoods is an essential principle within contemporary urban planning and design. Empirical studies by New Urbanists argue that mixed land use, neo-traditional, and walkable neighborhoods yield socioeconomic benefits and generate a substantial premium in residential property prices. However, few studies apply reliable metrics to capture the connections among urban form, the spatial distribution of land use, and travel behavior and then value their combined effects on housing prices. To bridge this gap, this study calculates the metrics of spatial accessibility and centrality, combining street nodes, networks, and built density by land use type within walkable neighborhoods. We investigate empirically the extent to which residents value spatial accessibility and centrality to residential, commercial, office, and industrial space regarding housing prices in Seoul, South Korea in 2010. The multilevel hedonic price models used suggest that residents highly value urban settings that access larger volumes of commercial and residential buildings in densely spaced areas along dense street networks. However, homeowners respond negatively to higher access to industrial property and weakly to office space. This analysis identifies the value of spatial access to heterogeneous land-use density in housing prices and provides policy implications for land use, transportation, and urban design.

Suggested Citation

  • Chang-Deok Kang, 2019. "Effects of spatial access to neighborhood land-use density on housing prices: Evidence from a multilevel hedonic analysis in Seoul, South Korea," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(4), pages 603-625, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:46:y:2019:i:4:p:603-625
    DOI: 10.1177/2399808317721184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2399808317721184
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2399808317721184?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reid Ewing & Robert Cervero, 2010. "Travel and the Built Environment," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(3), pages 265-294.
    2. Gary Pivo & Jeffrey D. Fisher, 2011. "The Walkability Premium in Commercial Real Estate Investments," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 39(2), pages 185-219, June.
    3. Elena G. Irwin, 2002. "The Effects of Open Space on Residential Property Values," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 78(4), pages 465-480.
    4. Elena G. Irwin & Nancy E. Bockstael, 2001. "The Problem of Identifying Land Use Spillovers: Measuring the Effects of Open Space on Residential Property Values," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 83(3), pages 698-704.
    5. Hans R.A. Koster & Jan Rouwendal, 2012. "The Impact Of Mixed Land Use On Residential Property Values," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(5), pages 733-761, December.
    6. Oliver Shyr & David Emanuel Andersson & Jamie Wang & Taiwei Huang & Olivia Liu, 2013. "Where Do Home Buyers Pay Most for Relative Transit Accessibility? Hong Kong, Taipei and Kaohsiung Compared," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(12), pages 2553-2568, September.
    7. Porta, Sergio & Crucitti, Paolo & Latora, Vito, 2006. "The network analysis of urban streets: A dual approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 369(2), pages 853-866.
    8. Charles C. Tu & Mark J. Eppli, 2001. "An Empirical Examination of Traditional Neighborhood Development," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 29(3), pages 485-501, March.
    9. Wang, Fahui & Antipova, Anzhelika & Porta, Sergio, 2011. "Street centrality and land use intensity in Baton Rouge, Louisiana," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 285-293.
    10. Song, Yan & Knaap, Gerrit-Jan, 2003. "New urbanism and housing values: a disaggregate assessment," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 218-238, September.
    11. Amy Helling & David Sawicki, 2003. "Race and residential accessibility to shopping and services," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1-2), pages 69-101.
    12. David J. Spiegelhalter & Nicola G. Best & Bradley P. Carlin & Angelika Van Der Linde, 2002. "Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(4), pages 583-639, October.
    13. John Matthews & Geoffrey Turnbull, 2007. "Neighborhood Street Layout and Property Value: The Interaction of Accessibility and Land Use Mix," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 111-141, August.
    14. Mika Kortelainen & Tuukka Saarimaa, 2015. "Do Urban Neighborhoods Benefit from Homeowners? Evidence from Housing Prices," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 117(1), pages 28-56, January.
    15. Hee Jin Yang & Jihoon Song & Mack Joong Choi, 2016. "Measuring the Externality Effects of Commercial Land Use on Residential Land Value: A Case Study of Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-15, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Danya Kim & Jangik Jin, 2019. "The Effect of Land Use on Housing Price and Rent: Empirical Evidence of Job Accessibility and Mixed Land Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Julia Freybote & Hua Sun & Xi Yang, 2015. "The Impact of LEED Neighborhood Certification on Condo Prices," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 43(3), pages 586-608, September.
    3. Yencha, Christopher, 2019. "Valuing walkability: New evidence from computer vision methods," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 689-709.
    4. Kevin Credit & Elizabeth Mack, 2019. "Place-making and performance: The impact of walkable built environments on business performance in Phoenix and Boston," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(2), pages 264-285, February.
    5. Hee Jin Yang & Jihoon Song & Mack Joong Choi, 2016. "Measuring the Externality Effects of Commercial Land Use on Residential Land Value: A Case Study of Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Song, Yan & Knaap, Gerrit-Jan, 2004. "Measuring the effects of mixed land uses on housing values," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 663-680, November.
    7. Tzu-Ling Chen & Hao-Wei Chiu & Yu-Fang Lin, 2020. "How do East and Southeast Asian Cities Differ from Western Cities? A Systematic Review of the Urban Form Characteristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
    8. Martin Scoppa & Rim Anabtawi, 2021. "Connectivity in Superblock Street Networks: Measuring Distance, Directness, and the Diversity of Pedestrian Paths," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Murakami, Jin & Villani, Caterina & Talamini, Gianni, 2021. "The capital value of pedestrianization in Asia's commercial cityscape: Evidence from office towers and retail streets," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 72-86.
    10. Benita, Francisco & Piliouras, Georgios, 2020. "Location, location, usage: How different notions of centrality can predict land usage in Singapore," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 540(C).
    11. Noland, Robert B. & Weiner, Marc D. & DiPetrillo, Stephanie & Kay, Andrew I., 2017. "Attitudes towards transit-oriented development: Resident experiences and professional perspectives," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 130-140.
    12. Jeremy Gabe & Spenser Robinson & Andrew Sanderford, 2022. "Willingness to Pay for Attributes of Location Efficiency," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 65(3), pages 384-418, October.
    13. Christopher Bitter, 2014. "Subdivision Vintage and Housing Prices: Do Home Buyers Value Traditional Development?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(5), pages 1038-1056, April.
    14. Fahad Ahmed Shaikh & Mir Aftab Hussain Talpur & Imtiaz Ahmed Chandio & Saima Kalwar, 2022. "Factors Influencing Residential Location Choice towards Mixed Land-Use Development: An Empirical Evidence from Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, November.
    15. Hanbing Yang & Meichen Fu & Li Wang & Feng Tang, 2021. "Mixed Land Use Evaluation and Its Impact on Housing Prices in Beijing Based on Multi-Source Big Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.
    16. Debanjana Dey & Noel Ritchey & Geoffrey K. Turnbull & Velma Zahirovic-Herbert, 2025. "Culture and Walkability: Ethnicity, Neighborhood Walkability, and House Price," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 70(2), pages 273-320, February.
    17. Guanwen Yin & Tianzi Liu & Yanbin Chen & Yiming Hou, 2022. "Disparity and Spatial Heterogeneity of the Correlation between Street Centrality and Land Use Intensity in Jinan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-23, November.
    18. Liu, Jixiang & Xiao, Longzhu, 2023. "Non-linear relationships between built environment and commuting duration of migrants and locals," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    19. Boeing, Geoff, 2017. "OSMnx: New Methods for Acquiring, Constructing, Analyzing, and Visualizing Complex Street Networks," SocArXiv q86sd, Center for Open Science.
    20. Sanglim Yoo & John E. Wagner, 2016. "A review of the hedonic literatures in environmental amenities from open space: a traditional econometric vs. spatial econometric model," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 141-166, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:46:y:2019:i:4:p:603-625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.