IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/eeupol/v27y2026i1p60-87.html

International sanctions and domestic backlash. Exploring public support towards the EU's rule of law enforcement

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Blauberger
  • Soso Makaradze
  • Gabriele Spilker

Abstract

Does communicating sanctions change how they are perceived by citizens in the target country? In this paper, we argue that not only sanction design, but also the framing of international sanctions and their endorsement by political actors can increase citizens’ support for sanctions. We test this argument in the case of the European Union and using conjoint experiments in Hungary, Poland, and Bulgaria. Our results show that both framing and cueing seem to matter in addition to the question of how sanctions are designed. While it is important for public support that procedural fairness is incorporated in designing the sanctions, framing sanctions in terms of protecting the rule of law and obtaining support from the domestic opposition seems to matter just as much.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Blauberger & Soso Makaradze & Gabriele Spilker, 2026. "International sanctions and domestic backlash. Exploring public support towards the EU's rule of law enforcement," European Union Politics, , vol. 27(1), pages 60-87, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:27:y:2026:i:1:p:60-87
    DOI: 10.1177/14651165251395302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14651165251395302
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/14651165251395302?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:27:y:2026:i:1:p:60-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.