IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecoind/v46y2025i4p1031-1059.html

Ownership, participation, and political behaviors: A latent-class analysis approach to democratic spillover

Author

Listed:
  • Jungook Kim

Abstract

For decades, citizen participation in important political decisions has declined and the promotion of democratic ideas in the world of work has become less significant. This study tests the ‘spillover thesis’ advanced by Carole Pateman, which argues that democratic participation in the workplace will ‘spill over’ into political participation. This study incorporates broad-based employee ownership, which provides employees with access to formal collective ownership of the company they work for, into the theoretical framework of the spillover thesis. This study also applies the latent-class analysis technique to identify the patterns of political behaviors. The results identified distinct patterns of political behaviors and demonstrated that demographic factors as well as differences in political efficacy contributed to the differences between patterns.

Suggested Citation

  • Jungook Kim, 2025. "Ownership, participation, and political behaviors: A latent-class analysis approach to democratic spillover," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 46(4), pages 1031-1059, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:46:y:2025:i:4:p:1031-1059
    DOI: 10.1177/0143831X241271038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X241271038
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0143831X241271038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Timming & Juliette Summers, 2020. "Is workplace democracy associated with wider pro-democracy affect? A structural equation model," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 41(3), pages 709-726, August.
    2. Sara M. Constantino & Alicia D. Cooperman & Thiago M. Q. Moreira, 2021. "Voting in a global pandemic: Assessing dueling influences of Covid‐19 on turnout," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(5), pages 2210-2235, September.
    3. Druckman, James N. & Klar, Samara & Krupnikov, Yanna & Levendusky, Matthew & Ryan, John Barry, 2021. "How Affective Polarization Shapes Americans’ Political Beliefs: A Study of Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic," Journal of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 223-234, November.
    4. Elden, J. Maxwell, 1981. "Political Efficacy at Work: The Connection between More Autonomous Forms of Workplace Organization and a More Participatory Politics," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 75(1), pages 43-58, March.
    5. Joseph Blasi & Michael Conte & Douglas Kruse, 1996. "Employee Stock Ownership and Corporate Performance among Public Companies," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 50(1), pages 60-79, October.
    6. Kirsten Cornelson & Boriana Miloucheva, 2022. "Political polarization and cooperation during a pandemic," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(9), pages 2025-2049, September.
    7. Kruse, Douglas L. & Freeman, Richard B. & Blasi, Joseph R. (ed.), 2010. "Shared Capitalism at Work," National Bureau of Economic Research Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9780226056951, December.
    8. Grimalda, Gianluca & Murtin, Fabrice & Pipke, David & Putterman, Louis & Sutter, Matthias, 2023. "The politicized pandemic: Ideological polarization and the behavioral response to COVID-19," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    9. John Godard, 2007. "Is Good Work Good for Democracy? Work, Change at Work and Political Participation in Canada and England," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 45(4), pages 760-790, December.
    10. Steven A. Peterson, 1992. "Workplace Politicization and its Political Spillovers: A Research Note," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 13(4), pages 511-524, November.
    11. Steven A. Peterson & Thomas A. Leitko & Wilford G. Miles, 1981. "Worker Participation and the Spillover Effect: The Case of Labor-Management Committees," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 2(1), pages 27-44, February.
    12. Daryl D’Art & Thomas Turner, 2007. "Trade Unions and Political Participation in the European Union: Still Providing a Democratic Dividend?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 45(1), pages 103-126, March.
    13. Helena Lopes & Sérgio Lagoa & Teresa Calapez, 2014. "Declining autonomy at work in the EU and its effect on civic behavior," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 35(2), pages 341-366, May.
    14. John W. Budd & J. Ryan Lamare & Andrew R. Timming, 2018. "Learning about Democracy at Work: Cross-National Evidence on Individual Employee Voice Influencing Political Participation in Civil Society," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 71(4), pages 956-985, August.
    15. Brady, Henry E. & Verba, Sidney & Schlozman, Kay Lehman, 1995. "Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 89(2), pages 271-294, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bram Geurkink & Agnes Akkerman & Roderick Sluiter, 2025. "Reinforcing the educational divide at work. How access to workplace political socialisation increases differences in political participation," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 31(4), pages 429-449, November.
    2. Johannes Kiess & Andre Schmidt, 2025. "The political spillover of workplace democratization: How democratic efficacy at the workplace contributes to countering right-wing extremist attitudes in Germany," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 46(2), pages 469-495, May.
    3. Steven A. Brieger & Eva Selenko & Alexander Newman, 2026. "Empowered for Democracy: Supervisory Role, National‐Level Workplace Democracy and Political Involvement," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 64(2), pages 358-377, June.
    4. Bilal Hassan, 2024. "Workplace democracy and democratic legitimacy in Europe," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 45(2), pages 389-414, May.
    5. Ansgar Richter & Susanne Schrader, 2017. "Levels of Employee Share Ownership and the Performance of Listed Companies in Europe," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 55(2), pages 396-420, June.
    6. Kim, Kyoung Yong & Patel, Pankaj C. & Devaraj, Srikant, 2025. "Sorting, incentive, and investment effects of employee stock ownership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    7. Nicolas Aubert & Xavier Hollandts, 2015. "How Shared Capitalism Affects Employee Withdrawal: An Econometric Case Study Of A French-Listed Company," Post-Print halshs-01256759, HAL.
    8. Kyoung Yong Kim & Pankaj C. Patel, 2021. "A Multilevel Contingency Model of Employee Ownership and Firm Productivity: The Moderating Roles of Industry Growth and Instability," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 625-648, May.
    9. Joseph Blasi & Richard Freeman & Douglas Kruse, 2016. "Do Broad-based Employee Ownership, Profit Sharing and Stock Options Help the Best Firms Do Even Better?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 54(1), pages 55-82, March.
    10. Jirjahn, Uwe & Le, Thi Xuan Thu, 2023. "Works Councils and Workers' Party Preferences in Germany," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1228, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    11. Douglas L. Kruse & Joseph R. Blasi & Richard B. Freeman, 2012. "Does Linking Worker Pay to Firm Performance Help the Best Firms Do Even Better?," NBER Working Papers 17745, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Uwe Jirjahn & Thi Xuan Thu Le, 2024. "Political spillovers of workplace democracy in Germany," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(1), pages 5-31, March.
    13. Loris Guery & Anne Stévenot, 2017. "L’actionnariat salarié favorise-t-il la diffusion d’information aux salariés et leur participation aux décisions stratégiques ? Une question de gouvernance d’entreprise," Post-Print hal-02500129, HAL.
    14. Park, Heejin & Noh, Jung-Hee & Pedersen, Melissa & Lee, Sora, 2022. "What are the determinants and managerial motivations for employee ownership in retirement pension plans?," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    15. Kruse, Douglas L. & Blasi, Joseph & Weltmann, Dan & Kang, Saehee & Kim, Jung Ook & Castellano, William, 2019. "Do Employee Share Owners Face Too Much Financial Risk?," IZA Discussion Papers 12303, IZA Network @ LISER.
    16. Prasad, Ajnesh, 2018. "When is economic inequality justified?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(6), pages 855-862.
    17. Nicolas Aubert & Alexander Kern & Xavier Hollandts, 2017. "Employee stock ownership and the cost of capital," Post-Print halshs-01502001, HAL.
    18. Burdin, Gabriel & Garcia-Louzao, Jose, 2025. "Employee-owned firms and the careers of young workers," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    19. Daniela Lup, 2022. "What makes an active citizen? A test of multiple links between workplace experiences and civic participation," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 60(3), pages 563-584, September.
    20. Kato, Takao & Kauhanen, Antti, 2013. "Performance Pay and Enterprise Productivity: The Details Matter," ETLA Working Papers 21, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:46:y:2025:i:4:p:1031-1059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekhist.uu.se/english.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.