IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecoind/v46y2025i2p469-495.html

The political spillover of workplace democratization: How democratic efficacy at the workplace contributes to countering right-wing extremist attitudes in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Johannes Kiess
  • Andre Schmidt

Abstract

Right-wing extremist attitudes are a severe challenge to democracies and trade union movements around the world. Moreover, changes in the world of work, economic insecurities, and the effects of globalized capitalism – all bread-and-butter topics for trade unions – are a breeding ground for right-wing extremism also in countries with comparatively strong social security and co-determination rights like Germany. In this article, the authors focus on democratic efficacy at the workplace as a protective factor against far-right politicisation among workers. They argue that experiencing control and influence on decision-making at the workplace is related to lower right-wing extremist attitudes. The article introduces a new measure employed in a representative survey in Germany. The findings strongly suggest that perceived democratic efficacy at the workplace reduces right-wing extremist attitude. This holds even when authoritarianism and standard socio-demographics are controlled for. The findings suggest an empowerment effect of efficacy experiences at the workplace. Such empowerment makes it less ‘necessary’ for individuals to devalue out-groups and deisre strong a (national) leadership. Practical implications and limitations of the study are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Johannes Kiess & Andre Schmidt, 2025. "The political spillover of workplace democratization: How democratic efficacy at the workplace contributes to countering right-wing extremist attitudes in Germany," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 46(2), pages 469-495, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:46:y:2025:i:2:p:469-495
    DOI: 10.1177/0143831X241261241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X241261241
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0143831X241261241?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Timming & Juliette Summers, 2020. "Is workplace democracy associated with wider pro-democracy affect? A structural equation model," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 41(3), pages 709-726, August.
    2. Richard Hyman, 2016. "The very idea of democracy at work," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 22(1), pages 11-24, February.
    3. Bilal Hassan, 2024. "Workplace democracy and democratic legitimacy in Europe," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 45(2), pages 389-414, May.
    4. Marsh, David, 1971. "Political Socialization: the Implicit Assumptions Questioned," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(4), pages 453-465, October.
    5. Armin Pircher Verdorfer & Wolfgang G Weber & Christine Unterrainer & Sarah Seyr, 2013. "The relationship between organizational democracy and socio-moral climate: Exploring effects of the ethical context in organizations," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 34(3), pages 423-449, August.
    6. Steven A. Peterson, 1992. "Workplace Politicization and its Political Spillovers: A Research Note," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 13(4), pages 511-524, November.
    7. Lipsitz, Lewis, 1964. "Work Life and Political Attitudes: A Study of Manual Workers," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 58(4), pages 951-962, December.
    8. Glenn Morgan & Valeria Pulignano, 2020. "Solidarity at Work: Concepts, Levels and Challenges," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(1), pages 18-34, February.
    9. Sinisa Hadziabdic & Lucio Baccaro, 2020. "A Switch or a Process? Disentangling the Effects of Union Membership on Political Attitudes in Switzerland and the UK," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 466-499, July.
    10. Helena Lopes & Sérgio Lagoa & Teresa Calapez, 2014. "Declining autonomy at work in the EU and its effect on civic behavior," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 35(2), pages 341-366, May.
    11. Elden, J. Maxwell, 1981. "Political Efficacy at Work: The Connection between More Autonomous Forms of Workplace Organization and a More Participatory Politics," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 75(1), pages 43-58, March.
    12. John W. Budd & J. Ryan Lamare & Andrew R. Timming, 2018. "Learning about Democracy at Work: Cross-National Evidence on Individual Employee Voice Influencing Political Participation in Civil Society," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 71(4), pages 956-985, August.
    13. Lisa Schur, 2003. "Employment and the Creation of an Active Citizenry," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 41(4), pages 751-771, December.
    14. Sherry Jueyu Wu & Elizabeth Levy Paluck, 2020. "Participatory practices at work change attitudes and behavior toward societal authority and justice," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
    15. Lorraine Ryan & Thomas Turner, 2021. "Does work socialisation matter? Worker engagement in political activities, attachment to democracy and openness to immigration," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 125-144, March.
    16. Greenberg, Edward S., 1981. "Industrial Self-Management and Political Attitudes," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 75(1), pages 29-42, March.
    17. Randy Hodson, 1995. "Worker Resistance: An Underdeveloped Concept in the Sociology of Work," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 16(1), pages 79-110, February.
    18. Sauer, Dieter & Detje, Richard, 2019. "Rechtspopulismus im Betrieb - Erscheinungsformen, Hintergründe, politischer Umgang," WSI-Mitteilungen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 72(3), pages 159-167.
    19. Edward S. Greenberg, 1983. "Context and Cooperation: Systematic Variation in the Political Effects of Workplace Democracy," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 4(2), pages 191-223, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matilda Gettins & Lorenz Meister, 2025. "Who Pays for Climate Policy? Distributional Narratives and Populist Backlash," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 2139, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jungook Kim, 2025. "Ownership, participation, and political behaviors: A latent-class analysis approach to democratic spillover," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 46(4), pages 1031-1059, November.
    2. Uwe Jirjahn & Thi Xuan Thu Le, 2024. "Political spillovers of workplace democracy in Germany," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(1), pages 5-31, March.
    3. Bram Geurkink & Agnes Akkerman & Roderick Sluiter, 2025. "Reinforcing the educational divide at work. How access to workplace political socialisation increases differences in political participation," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 31(4), pages 429-449, November.
    4. Jirjahn, Uwe & Le, Thi Xuan Thu, 2023. "Works Councils and Workers' Party Preferences in Germany," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1228, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    5. Budd, John W. & Lamare, J. Ryan, 2020. "Worker Voice and Political Participation in Civil Society," GLO Discussion Paper Series 725, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    6. Steven A. Peterson, 1992. "Workplace Politicization and its Political Spillovers: A Research Note," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 13(4), pages 511-524, November.
    7. Daniela Lup, 2022. "What makes an active citizen? A test of multiple links between workplace experiences and civic participation," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 60(3), pages 563-584, September.
    8. Andrew Timming & Juliette Summers, 2020. "Is workplace democracy associated with wider pro-democracy affect? A structural equation model," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 41(3), pages 709-726, August.
    9. Danat Valizade & Jo Ingold & Mark Stuart, 2023. "Employer Participation in Active Labour Market Policies in the United Kingdom and Denmark: The Effect of Employer Associations as Social Networks and the Mediating Role of Collective Voice," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(4), pages 991-1012, August.
    10. Bilal Hassan, 2024. "Workplace democracy and democratic legitimacy in Europe," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 45(2), pages 389-414, May.
    11. Hövermann, Andreas & Kohlrausch, Bettina & Langer, Arnim & Meuleman, Bart, 2025. "How work shapes democracy: Political preferences, populist attitudes and far-right voting intentions among the European labour force - a cross-country survey project in the face of the 2024 EU elections," WSI Studies 40, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    12. Roland Zullo, 2008. "Union Membership and Political Inclusion," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 62(1), pages 22-38, October.
    13. Fenet Jima Bedaso & Uwe Jirjahn, 2024. "Immigrants and trade union membership: Does integration into society and workplace play a moderating role?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 62(2), pages 262-292, June.
    14. Angelo Antoci & Fabio Sabatini & Mauro Sodini, 2009. "Will growth and technology destroy social interaction? The inverted U-shape hypothesis," CIMEO Working Paper Series 57, Centre for Investigation and Modelling of Experimental Observations (CIMEO).
    15. Hope Corman & Dhaval Dave & Nancy E. Reichman, 2017. "Effects Of Welfare Reform On Women'S Voting Participation," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 55(3), pages 1430-1451, July.
    16. Aliaksei Kazlou & Lin Lerpold & Örjan Sjöberg, 2024. "Trade unions, refugees and immigrant labour: Has the attitude changed? The stance of Swedish blue‐collar trade unions as evidenced by sentiment analysis," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(3), pages 222-239, May.
    17. Uwe Jirjahn & Johannes Kiess, 2024. "Does Employee Representation Foster Workplace Democracy?," Research Papers in Economics 2024-13, University of Trier, Department of Economics.
    18. Shruthi Mohan Menon & Gerard Rassendren, 2022. "Analysis of determinants of voter turnout in Indian states for election years 1991–2019," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 24(1), pages 30-45, June.
    19. Morten Madsen, 1997. "The 'Classroom Hypothesis' and Individualization," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 18(3), pages 359-391, August.
    20. repec:osf:socarx:y943w_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Josef Ringqvist, 2022. "Union membership and the willingness to prioritize environmental protection above growth and jobs: A multi‐level analysis covering 22 European countries," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 60(3), pages 662-682, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:46:y:2025:i:2:p:469-495. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekhist.uu.se/english.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.