IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecoind/v35y2014i2p289-308.html

The bitter recent history of employee involvement at Royal Mail: An aggressive management agenda versus resilient workplace unionism

Author

Listed:
  • David Beale
  • Stephen Mustchin

Abstract

Focused on a large, diverse branch of the British postal workers’ trade union, workplace union responses to Royal Mail’s employee involvement initiatives are examined through a two-stage longitudinal case study. Royal Mail – the letters section of the British postal service – has carried out a series of managerialist experiments with employee involvement and participation in the last few decades, providing the basis for an important research literature on union and worker responses to new management initiatives, participation and HRM. Findings suggest that these management initiatives and union responses have mutated over time, with an ever-growing gap between management rhetoric associated with employee involvement and increasingly punitive management practice; and with changing but relatively resilient, oppositional workplace union responses. These developments are closely related to the entrenched, confrontational nature of Royal Mail industrial relations that has persisted since the mid-1980s.

Suggested Citation

  • David Beale & Stephen Mustchin, 2014. "The bitter recent history of employee involvement at Royal Mail: An aggressive management agenda versus resilient workplace unionism," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 35(2), pages 289-308, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:35:y:2014:i:2:p:289-308
    DOI: 10.1177/0143831X13479042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X13479042
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0143831X13479042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miguel Lucio & Mike Noon & Sarah Jenkins 2, 2000. "The Flexible–Rigid Paradox of Employment Relations at Royal Mail (UK)," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 38(2), pages 277-298, June.
    2. repec:bla:jomstd:v:37:y:2000:i:4:p:499-520 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Edward L. Kick & James C. Fraser & Byron L. Davis, 2006. "Performance Management, Managerial Citizenship and Worker Commitment: A Study of the United States Postal Service with Some Global Implications," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 27(1), pages 137-172, February.
    4. Gregor Gall, 2001. "The Organization of Organized Discontent: The Case of the Postal Workers in Britain," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 39(3), pages 393-409, September.
    5. Jörg Flecker & Christoph Hermann, 2011. "The liberalization of public services: Company reactions and consequences for employment and working conditions," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 32(3), pages 523-544, August.
    6. Thorsten Schulten & Torsten Brandt & Christoph Hermann, 2008. "Liberalisation and privatisation of public services and strategic options for European trade unions," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 14(2), pages 295-311, May.
    7. Randy Hodson, 1995. "Worker Resistance: An Underdeveloped Concept in the Sociology of Work," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 16(1), pages 79-110, February.
    8. Mick Marchington & Adrian Wilkinson & Peter Ackers & John Goodman, 1993. "The Influence of Managerial Relations on Waves of Employee Involvement," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 31(4), pages 553-576, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daina Bellido de Luna, 2022. "Management, the state and union-weakening practices in Chile: A case study approach of the dual and ambivalent role of the state in a process of democratisation," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(3), pages 1143-1163, August.
    2. Daniel Evans & Karl Jones, 2025. "Change and Resistance in the Royal Mail: Dispatches from the 2022/2023 Postal Workers’ Strike," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 39(5), pages 1269-1279, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonathan Preminger, 2016. "The contradictory effects of neoliberalization on labour relations: The health and social work sectors," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 37(4), pages 644-664, November.
    2. Paul Stewart & Miguel Martínez Lucio, 2011. "Collective narratives and politics in the contemporary study of work: the new management practices debate," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 25(2), pages 327-341, June.
    3. Daniel Evans & Karl Jones, 2025. "Change and Resistance in the Royal Mail: Dispatches from the 2022/2023 Postal Workers’ Strike," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 39(5), pages 1269-1279, October.
    4. Johannes Kiess & Andre Schmidt, 2025. "The political spillover of workplace democratization: How democratic efficacy at the workplace contributes to countering right-wing extremist attitudes in Germany," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 46(2), pages 469-495, May.
    5. Bryson, Alex & Freeman, Richard B., 2007. "Doing the right thing? does fair share capitalism improve workplace performance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 4964, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Peter Butler & Olga Tregaskis & Linda Glover, 2013. "Workplace partnership and employee involvement – contradictions and synergies: Evidence from a heavy engineering case study," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 34(1), pages 5-24, February.
    7. Lisa Dorigatti & Anna Mori, 2025. "The role of trade union power resources in experimenting with ‘buying decent work’: the case of the Italian public procurement protocols," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 31(2), pages 215-232, May.
    8. Budd, John W. & Johnstone, Stewart & Lamare, J. Ryan, 2023. "Never ‘one-size-fits-all’ Mick Marchington's unique voice on voice, from micro-level informality to macro-level turbulence," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 125304, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Simona Brunnerová & Jan Czarzasty & Marta Kahancová, 2025. "Creating public value in hostile conditions: public procurement as an opportunity for collective bargaining in Poland and Slovakia," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 31(2), pages 179-196, May.
    10. Holly Patrick-Thomson & Michael Kranert, 2021. "Don’t Work for Free: Online Discursive Resistance to Precarity in Commercial Photography," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 35(6), pages 1034-1052, December.
    11. Eleanor Kirk, 2018. "The (re)organisation of conflict at work: Mobilisation, counter-mobilisation and the displacement of grievance expressions," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 39(4), pages 639-660, November.
    12. Bettina Wagner & Anke Hassel, 2016. "Posting, subcontracting and low-wage employment in the German meat industry," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 22(2), pages 163-178, May.
    13. Kim Hoque & Scott Taylor & Emma Bell, 2005. "Investors in People: Market‐led Voluntarism in Vocational Education and Training," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 43(1), pages 135-153, March.
    14. Melanie Tebbutt & Mick Marchington, 1997. "`Look Before You Speak': Gossip and the Insecure Workplace'," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 11(4), pages 713-735, December.
    15. Bob Carter & Steven Davies & Peter Fairbrother, 2002. "The Rise and Rise of Market Relations in the British Public Sector: Implications for Industrial Relations," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 13(1), pages 36-59, June.
    16. Taylan Acar, 2018. "Variation in worker responses to subcontracted employment: A qualitative case study," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 39(2), pages 332-356, May.
    17. Lust, Michael, 2026. "Das Phänomen "akademischer Widerstand" an deutschen Hochschulen: Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel der Einführung von Qualitätsmanagement," Working Papers 20, Helmut Schmidt University, Research Cluster OPAL.
    18. Siebert, Sabina, 2019. "‘A deeply troubled organization’: Organizational satire in the BBC’s W1A comedy series," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 56-63.
    19. Lindsey D. Cameron & Hatim Rahman, 2022. "Expanding the Locus of Resistance: Understanding the Co-constitution of Control and Resistance in the Gig Economy," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 38-58, January.
    20. Robert Perrett, 2007. "Worker voice in the context of the re-regulation of employment: employer tactics and statutory union recognition in the UK," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 21(4), pages 617-634, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:35:y:2014:i:2:p:289-308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekhist.uu.se/english.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.