IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v35y2021i6p1034-1052.html

Don’t Work for Free: Online Discursive Resistance to Precarity in Commercial Photography

Author

Listed:
  • Holly Patrick-Thomson

    (Edinburgh Napier University, UK)

  • Michael Kranert

    (University of Southampton, UK)

Abstract

While increasing academic attention has been paid to the precariousness of contemporary work, less research has examined how workers organise in response. This article examines how a group of precarious workers – commercial photographers – use an online forum to resist changes to their working conditions. Our findings illustrate how the forum enables photographers to share knowledge, debate rules and organise collectively. We discuss two implications: firstly that the forum performs many of the functions of a professional association, and so gives us a new insight into how traditional forms of worker organisation may be translated in the digital realm; and secondly, that the form of collective resistance produced by the group may constitute a move beyond existing understandings of online resistance as relatively ineffectual. Our work contributes a new perspective on how precarity is reshaping workers’ collective organisation and resistance mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Holly Patrick-Thomson & Michael Kranert, 2021. "Don’t Work for Free: Online Discursive Resistance to Precarity in Commercial Photography," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 35(6), pages 1034-1052, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:35:y:2021:i:6:p:1034-1052
    DOI: 10.1177/0950017020952630
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017020952630
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0950017020952630?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Will Sutherland & Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi & Michael Dunn & Sarah Beth Nelson, 2020. "Work Precarity and Gig Literacies in Online Freelancing," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(3), pages 457-475, June.
    2. Randy Hodson, 1995. "Worker Resistance: An Underdeveloped Concept in the Sociology of Work," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 16(1), pages 79-110, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jeremy Aroles & Aurélie Leclercq-Vandelannoitte & John Hasard & William M Foster & Edward Granter, 2024. "Won't Get Fooled Again? Theorising Discursive Constructions of Novelty in the 'New' World of Work," Post-Print hal-04845366, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Behl, Abhishek & Jayawardena, Nirma & Ishizaka, Alessio & Gupta, Manish & Shankar, Amit, 2022. "Gamification and gigification: A multidimensional theoretical approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1378-1393.
    2. Johannes Kiess & Andre Schmidt, 2025. "The political spillover of workplace democratization: How democratic efficacy at the workplace contributes to countering right-wing extremist attitudes in Germany," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 46(2), pages 469-495, May.
    3. Philip Hancock & Melissa Tyler & Mark Godiva, 2021. "Thursday Night and a Sing-along ‘Sung Alone’: The Experiences of a Self-employed Performer During the Pandemic," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 35(6), pages 1155-1166, December.
    4. Ana Alacovska & Eliane Bucher & Christian Fieseler, 2024. "A Relational Work Perspective on the Gig Economy: Doing Creative Work on Digital Labour Platforms," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(1), pages 161-179, February.
    5. Maria Akhtar & Azmat Yar Khan & Aneeqa Zubair, 2026. "Metaverse Insights: Boosting Freelancers’ Performance via Work Flexibility and Career Adaptability in the Lens of Social Cognitive Perspective," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 17(1), pages 2531-2554, February.
    6. Nancy Worth & E. Alkim Karaagac, 2022. "Accounting for Absences and Ambiguities in the Freelancing Labour Relation," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 113(1), pages 96-108, February.
    7. Eleanor Kirk, 2018. "The (re)organisation of conflict at work: Mobilisation, counter-mobilisation and the displacement of grievance expressions," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 39(4), pages 639-660, November.
    8. Jie Ren & Viju Raghupathi & Wullianallur Raghupathi, 2023. "Exploring Influential Factors in Hiring Freelancers in Online Labor Platforms: An Empirical Study," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, March.
    9. Lena Knappert & Boukje Cnossen & Renate Ortlieb, 2025. "Inequality Regimes in Coworking Spaces: How New Forms of Organising (Re)produce Inequalities," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 39(1), pages 43-63, February.
    10. Qi Zheng & Jing Zhan & Xinying Xu, 2024. "Platform Training and Learning by Doing and Gig Workers’ Incomes: Empirical Evidence From China’s Food Delivery Riders," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, September.
    11. Netta Avnoon, 2021. "Data Scientists’ Identity Work: Omnivorous Symbolic Boundaries in Skills Acquisition," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 35(2), pages 332-349, April.
    12. Yaoyao Wei & Cuiyin yao & Wei-fan Chen & Tian Xie & Jinzhao Yang, 2024. "Qbnb: An innovative C2B2C2B2C e-commerce mode for integrated on-demand services," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-29, March.
    13. Valeria Pulignano & Karol Muszyński & Maite Tapia, 2024. "Variations of Freelancers’ “Effort-Bargain†Experiences in Platform Work: The Role of Skills," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 77(5), pages 742-769, October.
    14. Taylan Acar, 2018. "Variation in worker responses to subcontracted employment: A qualitative case study," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 39(2), pages 332-356, May.
    15. Jing Wang & Quan Meng, 2024. "Unregulated Flexibility and the Multiplication of Labour: Work in the Chinese Platform Economy," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    16. Lust, Michael, 2026. "Das Phänomen "akademischer Widerstand" an deutschen Hochschulen: Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel der Einführung von Qualitätsmanagement," Working Papers 20, Helmut Schmidt University, Research Cluster OPAL.
    17. Maria Hameed Khan & Jannine Williams & Penny Williams & Robyn Mayes, 2024. "Caring in the Gig Economy: A Relational Perspective of Decent Work," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(4), pages 1107-1127, August.
    18. Dominika Polkowska, 2021. "Unionisation and mobilisation within platform work: towards precarisation—a case of Uber drivers in Poland," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 25-39, January.
    19. Lindsey D. Cameron & Hatim Rahman, 2022. "Expanding the Locus of Resistance: Understanding the Co-constitution of Control and Resistance in the Gig Economy," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 38-58, January.
    20. Christina Purcell & Paul Brook, 2022. "At Least I’m My Own Boss! Explaining Consent, Coercion and Resistance in Platform Work," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 36(3), pages 391-406, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:35:y:2021:i:6:p:1034-1052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.