IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rvr/journl/201410471.html

Elinor Ostrom et les faisceaux de droits : l’ouverture d’un nouvel espace pour penser la propriété commune

Author

Listed:
  • Orsi, Fabienne

Abstract

En mobilisant une certaine manière de concevoir la propriété, en termes de faisceau de droits, les travaux d’Ostrom sur la propriété ouvrent un véritable espace pour penser la propriété commune aujourd’hui. Cet article propose d’éclairer la portée des travaux d’Ostrom en les situant dans l’histoire du concept de faisceau de droits et des enjeux politiques et intellectuels associés à ce concept. Initiée par John Commons et les juristes critiques américains du début du xxe siècle, cette conception de la propriété est ensuite récupérée par les penseurs libéraux. En mobilisant l’approche par les faisceaux de droits dans la lignée revendiquée de Commons, Ostrom opère alors un renversement des positions de « l’école des droits de propriété » pour proposer une conceptualisation inédite de la propriété commune.

Suggested Citation

  • Orsi, Fabienne, 2013. "Elinor Ostrom et les faisceaux de droits : l’ouverture d’un nouvel espace pour penser la propriété commune," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 14.
    • Handle: RePEc:rvr:journl:2014:10471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://regulation.revues.org/10471
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://regulation.revues.org/pdf/10471
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J.M. Neeson & Hannah Collings, 1999. "La clôture des terres et la société rurale britannique : une revue critique," Histoire, économie & société, Programme National Persée, vol. 18(1), pages 83-106.
    2. repec:cup:jechis:v:33:y:1973:i:01:p:16-27_07 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Edella Schlager & Elinor Ostrom, 1992. "Property-Rights Regimes and Natural Resources: A Conceptual Analysis," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 68(3), pages 249-262.
    4. Elinor Ostrom, 2010. "Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(3), pages 641-672, June.
    5. repec:ejw:journl:v:8:y:2011:i:3:p:193-204 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. repec:ejw:journl:v:8:y:2011:i:3:p:223-235 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Philippe Steiner, 1987. "Le projet physiocratique : théorie de la propriété et lien social," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 38(6), pages 1111-1128.
    8. Coriat, Benjamin, 2013. "Le retour des communs," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 14.
    9. Tine De Moor, 2009. "Avoiding tragedies: a Flemish common and its commoners under the pressure of social and economic change during the eighteenth century1," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 62(1), pages 1-22, February.
    10. Chanteau, Jean-Pierre & Labrousse, Agnès, 2013. "L’institutionnalisme méthodologique d’Elinor Ostrom : quelques enjeux et controverses," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 14.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicolas Jullien & Karine Roudaut, 2020. "Commun numérique de connaissance : définition et conditions d’existence," Innovations, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(3), pages 69-93.
    2. Stéphanie Leyronas & Benjamin Coriat, 2023. "Cadrage théorique, méthodologie et organisation de l’ouvrage," Post-Print hal-05428783, HAL.
    3. Mélanie Clément-Fontaine & Mélanie Dulong De Rosnay & Nicolas Jullien & Jean-Benoît Zimmermann, 2021. "Communs numériques : une nouvelle forme d’action collective ?," Post-Print hal-03271096, HAL.
    4. Philippe Eynaud & Clément Feger & Corinne Vercher, 2024. "Introduction The commons and its promises. A documented analysis of the ecological and social transition [Introduction Les communs et leurs promesses. Pour une analyse documentée en matière de transition écologique et sociale]," Post-Print hal-04767973, HAL.
    5. Chanteau, Jean-Pierre & Labrousse, Agnès, 2013. "L’institutionnalisme méthodologique d’Elinor Ostrom : quelques enjeux et controverses," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 14.
    6. Chanteau, Jean-Pierre & Coriat, Benjamin & Labrousse, Agnès & Orsi, Fabienne, 2013. "Introduction," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 14.
    7. Bazen, Stephen & Bouvard, Laurence & Zimmermann, Jean-Benoît, 2015. "Musicians and the Creative Commons: A survey of artists on Jamendo," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 65-76.
    8. Massimo Cervesato, 2026. "Conceptualizing Common Property Rights: An Institutionalist Reading of Elinor Ostrom," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 26005, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    9. Buchs, Arnaud, 2014. "Comprendre le changement institutionnel," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 16.
    10. Antoine Dolcerocca & Benjamin Coriat, 2016. "Commons and the Public Domain," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 48(1), pages 127-139, March.
    11. Coriat, Benjamin, 2013. "Le retour des communs," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 14.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Allaire, Gilles, 2013. "Les communs comme infrastructure institutionnelle de l’économie marchande," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 14.
    2. Chanteau, Jean-Pierre & Coriat, Benjamin & Labrousse, Agnès & Orsi, Fabienne, 2013. "Introduction," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 14.
    3. Josemiguel Lana Berasain & Miguel Laborda Pemán, 2013. "El anidamiento institucional y su dinámica histórica en comunidades rurales complejas. Dos estudios de caso (Navarra, siglos XIV-XX)," Documentos de Trabajo de la Sociedad de Estudios de Historia Agraria 1307, Sociedad de Estudios de Historia Agraria.
    4. Hervé Charmettant & Yvan Renou, 2021. "Cooperative conversion and communalization: Closely observed interactions between the material and the mental," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(1), pages 55-77, March.
    5. Weinstein, Olivier, 2013. "Comment comprendre les « communs » : Elinor Ostrom, la propriété et la nouvelle économie institutionnelle," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 14.
    6. Simon Cornée & Madeg Le Guernic & Damien Rousselière, 2020. "Governing Common-Property Assets: Theory and Evidence from Agriculture," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(4), pages 691-710, November.
    7. Robert Wade & Geraint Ellis, 2022. "Reclaiming the Windy Commons: Landownership, Wind Rights, and the Assetization of Renewable Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-31, May.
    8. Rizwana Alam & Jon C. Lovett, 2019. "Prospects of Public Participation in the Planning and Management of Urban Green Spaces in Lahore: A Discourse Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-28, June.
    9. Harris,Colin & Cai,Meina & Murtazashvili,Ilia & Murtazashvili,Jennifer Brick, 2020. "The Origins and Consequences of Property Rights," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781108969055.
    10. Richter, Andries & Grasman, Johan, 2013. "The transmission of sustainable harvesting norms when agents are conditionally cooperative," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 202-209.
    11. Croutzet, Alexandre & Lasserre, Pierre, 2017. "Optimal completeness of property rights on renewable resources in the presence of market power," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 16-32.
    12. James Rising, 2014. "Creating the Commons: Fisheries and the World Bank," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(1), pages 75-95.
    13. Peter Boettke & Jayme Lemke & Liya Palagashvili, 2015. "Polycentricity, Self-governance, and the Art & Science of Association," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 28(3), pages 311-335, September.
    14. Waśniewski, Krzysztof, 2012. "Comparative, dynamic efficiency of national healthcare systems," MPRA Paper 38029, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Alexandros Maziotis & Elisa Calliari & Jaroslav Mysiak, 2013. "Robust Institutions for Sustainable Water Markets: A Survey of the Literature and the Way Forward," Working Papers 2013.58, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    16. Laura Albareda & Alejo Jose G. Sison, 2020. "Commons Organizing: Embedding Common Good and Institutions for Collective Action. Insights from Ethics and Economics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(4), pages 727-743, November.
    17. Liu, Jing & Qin, Tianbao, 2018. "A Comparative Analysis of Fishing Rights From a Transaction Cost Perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 89-99.
    18. Murtazashvili, Ilia & Murtazashvili, Jennifer & Salahodjaev, Raufhon, 2019. "Trust and deforestation: A cross-country comparison," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 111-119.
    19. Guillaume Compain & Philippe Eynaud & Lionel Morel & Corinne Vercher-Chaptal, 2019. "Alternative Platforms and Societal Horizon : Characterisation and Strategies for Development," Post-Print halshs-02140104, HAL.
    20. Stéphanie Leyronas & Benjamin Coriat, 2023. "Cadrage théorique, méthodologie et organisation de l’ouvrage," Post-Print hal-05428783, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • P14 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Property Rights
    • K11 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Property Law
    • B15 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary
    • P26 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Property Rights

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rvr:journl:2014:10471. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pascal Seppecher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://theorie-regulation.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.