IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/mrpase/v17y2025i2p5-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategies For Airline Competitiveness: Analyzing Key Product Features And Decision-Maker Priorities Using Spherical Fuzzy Ahp

Author

Listed:
  • Kasım KİRACI

    (Iskenderun Technical University, Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics)

  • Mehmet YAÅžAR

    (Kastamonu University, School of Civil Aviation)

  • Ercan AKAN

    (Iskenderun Technical University, Barbaros Hayrettin Naval Architecture and Maritime Faculty)

Abstract

The airline transportation industry is one of the most fiercely competitive sectors. To survive and gain competitive advantage, airlines may need to not only design new products but also redesign existing products to meet passengers' wants, desires and expectations. Therefore, in this study, we focus on airlines' key product futures. The aim of this study is to reveal the airline key product features that are important to the decision makers in airlines. In the study, we created a key product features pool, which is critical for airlines, through studies in the literature. We reached out to airline managers to reveal the importance of airline key product features, which consist of 6 main criteria and 30 sub-criteria. We used the Spherical Fuzzy (SF) Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) as the method in the study. The findings of the study show that some product components are more critical than others in the airline transportation industry. In addition, the results of the study demonstrate that the main price-related dimensions are critical for airline decision makers. In the sub-dimensions, airline ticket price, reputation of safety, ticket flexibility and seat cost for previous flight are the sub-criteria that airline managers focus on.

Suggested Citation

  • Kasım KİRACI & Mehmet YAÅžAR & Ercan AKAN, 2025. "Strategies For Airline Competitiveness: Analyzing Key Product Features And Decision-Maker Priorities Using Spherical Fuzzy Ahp," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(2), pages 5-25, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:rom:mrpase:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:5-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mrp.ase.ro/v17i2/1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:mrpase:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:5-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Colesca Sofia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.