IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/ecopol/s21163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential Role of Bioenergy in Decarbonizing Russia’s Economy
[Потенциал Биоэнергетики В Декарбонизации Экономики России]

Author

Listed:
  • Safonov, Georgy (Сафонов, Георгий)

    (European Forest Institute)

  • Kozeltsev, Mikhail (Козельцев, Михаил)

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

  • Potashnikov, Vladimir (Поташников, Владимир)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Dorina, Alexandra (Дорина, Александра)

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

  • Semakina, Anastasiya (Семакина, Анастасия)

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

Abstract

Russia is one of the world’s chief emitters of greenhouse gases even though it has vast potential to use zero-carbon energy resources, particularly biofuels. In order to prevent global warming above 1.5–2° C, Russia announced its commitment under the UN Paris Agreement to reach carbon neutrality by 2060. Analysis of the low-carbon development scenarios based on the RU-TIMES model developed for Russia indicates that cost-effective pathways toward deep decarbonization of the national economy are not feasible without extensive use of biofuels. By 2050 bioenergy together with improved energy efficiency, solar and wind power, and carbon capture and storage technologies could result in CO2 emissions from domestic energy production that are 80–90% less than in 2010. Russia’s rich store of natural resources and innovative technologies offer opportunities to increase domestic production of bioenergy by 2050 to levels comparable with the output from all of its nuclear and hydropower plants. Russia’s competitive advantages could make it a world leader in modern bioenergy markets, especially during the transition to green energy, decarbonization of the global economy, and international carbon pricing. However, developing bioenergy is not a priority for either the Russian Energy Strategy Through 2035 or the Low-Carbon Development Strategy Through 2050. This study provides more accurate estimates of the potential for bioenergy to fulfill Russia’s Paris Agreement commitments and thoroughly decarbonize its economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Safonov, Georgy (Сафонов, Георгий) & Kozeltsev, Mikhail (Козельцев, Михаил) & Potashnikov, Vladimir (Поташников, Владимир) & Dorina, Alexandra (Дорина, Александра) & Semakina, Anastasiya (Семакина, Ан, 2022. "Potential Role of Bioenergy in Decarbonizing Russia’s Economy [Потенциал Биоэнергетики В Декарбонизации Экономики России]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 6, pages 90-111, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:s21163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/ecopol/s21163.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gunnar Luderer & Zoi Vrontisi & Christoph Bertram & Oreane Y. Edelenbosch & Robert C. Pietzcker & Joeri Rogelj & Harmen Sytze Boer & Laurent Drouet & Johannes Emmerling & Oliver Fricko & Shinichiro Fu, 2018. "Residual fossil CO2 emissions in 1.5–2 °C pathways," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(7), pages 626-633, July.
    2. George Safonov & Vladimir Potashnikov & Oleg Lugovoy & Mikhail Safonov & Alexandra Dorina & Andrei Bolotov, 2020. "The low carbon development options for Russia," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(4), pages 1929-1945, October.
    3. Joeri Rogelj & Michiel Schaeffer & Pierre Friedlingstein & Nathan P. Gillett & Detlef P. van Vuuren & Keywan Riahi & Myles Allen & Reto Knutti, 2016. "Differences between carbon budget estimates unravelled," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(3), pages 245-252, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Di Xu & Wenpeng Lin, 2025. "Carbon Emission Forecasts Under the Scenario of a 1.5 °C Increase: A Multi-National Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Yang Ou & Christopher Roney & Jameel Alsalam & Katherine Calvin & Jared Creason & Jae Edmonds & Allen A. Fawcett & Page Kyle & Kanishka Narayan & Patrick O’Rourke & Pralit Patel & Shaun Ragnauth & Ste, 2021. "Deep mitigation of CO2 and non-CO2 greenhouse gases toward 1.5 °C and 2 °C futures," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Florian Leblanc & Ruben Bibas & Silvana Mima & Matteo Muratori & Shogo Sakamoto & Fuminori Sano & Nico Bauer & Vassilis Daioglou & Shinichiro Fujimori & Matthew J. Gidden & Estsushi Kato & Steven K. R, 2022. "The contribution of bioenergy to the decarbonization of transport: a multi-model assessment," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 170(3), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Gumber, Anurag & Zana, Riccardo & Steffen, Bjarne, 2024. "A global analysis of renewable energy project commissioning timelines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    5. Zhang, Zhuo & Zhao, Yongliang & Cai, Haiya & Ajaz, Tahseen, 2023. "Influence of renewable energy infrastructure, Chinese outward FDI, and technical efficiency on ecological sustainability in belt and road node economies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 608-616.
    6. Wadim Strielkowski & Anna Sherstobitova & Patrik Rovny & Tatiana Evteeva, 2021. "Increasing Energy Efficiency and Modernization of Energy Systems in Russia: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, May.
    7. Kejun Jiang & Sha Chen & Chenmin He & Jia Liu & Sun Kuo & Li Hong & Songli Zhu & Xiang Pianpian, 2019. "Energy transition, CO2 mitigation, and air pollutant emission reduction: scenario analysis from IPAC model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(3), pages 1277-1293, December.
    8. Roland Clift & Sarah Sim & Henry King & Jonathan L. Chenoweth & Ian Christie & Julie Clavreul & Carina Mueller & Leo Posthuma & Anne-Marie Boulay & Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer & Julia Chatterton & Fabrice , 2017. "The Challenges of Applying Planetary Boundaries as a Basis for Strategic Decision-Making in Companies with Global Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-23, February.
    9. Heleen L. Soest & Lara Aleluia Reis & Luiz Bernardo Baptista & Christoph Bertram & Jacques Després & Laurent Drouet & Michel Elzen & Panagiotis Fragkos & Oliver Fricko & Shinichiro Fujimori & Neil Gra, 2021. "Global roll-out of comprehensive policy measures may aid in bridging emissions gap," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    10. Shinichiro Fujimori & Tomoko Hasegawa & Volker Krey & Keywan Riahi & Christoph Bertram & Benjamin Leon Bodirsky & Valentina Bosetti & Jessica Callen & Jacques Després & Jonathan Doelman & Laurent Drou, 2019. "A multi-model assessment of food security implications of climate change mitigation," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 2(5), pages 386-396, May.
    11. Paul Wolfram & Stephanie Weber & Kenneth Gillingham & Edgar G. Hertwich, 2021. "Pricing indirect emissions accelerates low—carbon transition of US light vehicle sector," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-8, December.
    12. Coppens, Léo & Venmans, Frank, 2025. "The welfare properties of climate targets," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    13. Xin Zhao & Bryan K. Mignone & Marshall A. Wise & Haewon C. McJeon, 2024. "Trade-offs in land-based carbon removal measures under 1.5 °C and 2 °C futures," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    14. Roberto Schaeffer & V. Bosetti & E. Kriegler & K. Riahi & D. Vuuren, 2020. "Climatic change: CD-Links special issue on national low-carbon development pathways," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(4), pages 1779-1785, October.
    15. Frischmuth, Felix & Härtel, Philipp, 2022. "Hydrogen sourcing strategies and cross-sectoral flexibility trade-offs in net-neutral energy scenarios for Europe," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    16. Carl-Friedrich Schleussner & Joeri Rogelj & Michiel Schaeffer & Tabea Lissner & Rachel Licker & Erich M. Fischer & Reto Knutti & Anders Levermann & Katja Frieler & William Hare, 2016. "Science and policy characteristics of the Paris Agreement temperature goal," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(9), pages 827-835, September.
    17. Jiang, Hou & Lu, Ning & Yao, Ling & Qin, Jun & Liu, Tang, 2023. "Impact of climate changes on the stability of solar energy: Evidence from observations and reanalysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 726-736.
    18. Michael G. Windisch & Florian Humpenöder & Leon Merfort & Nico Bauer & Gunnar Luderer & Jan Philipp Dietrich & Jens Heinke & Christoph Müller & Gabriel Abrahao & Hermann Lotze-Campen & Alexander Popp, 2025. "Hedging our bet on forest permanence for the economic viability of climate targets," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-10, December.
    19. Rik van Heerden & Oreane Y Edelenbosch & Vassilis Daioglou & Thomas Le Gallic & Luiz Bernardo Baptista & Alice Di Bella & Francesco Pietro Colelli & Johannes Emmerling & Panagiotis Fragkos & Robin Has, 2025. "Demand-side strategies enable rapid and deep cuts in buildings and transport emissions to 2050," Post-Print hal-04985303, HAL.
    20. Wu, Yazhen & Deppermann, Andre & Havlík, Petr & Frank, Stefan & Ren, Ming & Zhao, Hao & Ma, Lin & Fang, Chen & Chen, Qi & Dai, Hancheng, 2023. "Global land-use and sustainability implications of enhanced bioenergy import of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Paris Agreement; greenhouse gases; biofuel; low carbon development.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
    • F53 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Agreements and Observance; International Organizations
    • O44 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Environment and Growth
    • Q21 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Demand and Supply; Prices
    • P20 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:s21163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.