IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/ecopol/ep1715.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating Demand for preschools in Russia
[Спрос На Услуги Дошкольных Образовательных Организаций: Эмпирический Анализ]

Author

Listed:
  • Levin, Mark (Левин, Марк)

    () (Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; National Research University Higher School of Economics)

  • Oshchepkov, Aleksey (Ощепков, Алексей)

    () (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

  • Shilova, Nadezhda (Шилова, Надежда)

    () (Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; National Research University Higher School of Economics)

Abstract

In this paper, using RLMS-HSE micro-data of 2000–2015 we analyze demand for preschools in Russia. Measuring demand for preschools, in particular unsatisfied demand is of high importance for public policy, but it is a challenging task due to the traditional identification problem: only a joint outcome of demand and supply is observed but not the demand itself. This problem is particularly severe in the Russian case where supply of slots in preschools is rationed and prices are regulated by state. To overcome this problem we employ an approach first proposed by Poirier (1980) and estimate a joint system of demand and supply equations as a partial observability model. Our results confirm a widespread view about the strong deficit of slots in preschools in Russia. We find that almost 80% all mothers with children of age 0–7 are willing to use preschools, but almost half of them are not able to do that due to the limited supply. At the same time, we show that there is a non-negligible group of households which potentially might use preschools but don’t do that. This indicates that a more effective redistribution of resources within the Russian public preschool system could lead to a higher enrollment. We also find that the amount of unsatisfied demand among non-employed mothers is higher than among the employed ones, which suggests that raising the availability of preschools could stimulate labor force participation of Russian women

Suggested Citation

  • Levin, Mark (Левин, Марк) & Oshchepkov, Aleksey (Ощепков, Алексей) & Shilova, Nadezhda (Шилова, Надежда), 2017. "Estimating Demand for preschools in Russia
    [Спрос На Услуги Дошкольных Образовательных Организаций: Эмпирический Анализ]
    ," Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 2, pages 100-131, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1715
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: ftp://w82.ranepa.ru/rnp/ecopol/ep1715.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joshua D. Angrist & Alan B. Krueger, 2001. "Instrumental Variables and the Search for Identification: From Supply and Demand to Natural Experiments," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 15(4), pages 69-85, Fall.
    2. André van Stel & David Storey, 2002. "The Relationship between Firm Births and Job Creation," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 02-052/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    3. repec:mes:jeciss:v:49:y:2015:i:4:p:1124-1133 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Eric Danan & Thibault Gajdos & Brian Hill & Jean-Marc Tallon, 2014. "Aggregating Tastes, Beliefs, and Attitudes under Uncertainty," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01099032, HAL.
    5. Irina Seliverstova, 2008. "Children’s enrollment in preschool education: Level, variations between regions and its reasons," Educational Studies, Higher School of Economics, issue 3, pages 199-209.
    6. Garrett, James L. & Ruel, Marie T., 2003. "Stunted child - overweight mother pairs," FCND briefs 148, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    7. Eric Giraud-Héraud & Yves Surry, 2001. "Les réponses de la recherche aux nouveaux enjeux de l’économie viti-vinicole," Post-Print hal-01200932, HAL.
    8. Tom Kornstad & Thor Thoresen, 2007. "A discrete choice model for labor supply and childcare," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 20(4), pages 781-803, October.
    9. Lijia Wang & Xuexi Huo & Shajahan Kabir, 2013. "Technical and cost efficiency of rural household apple production," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 5(3), pages 391-411, August.
    10. Robert Breunig & Andrew Weiss & Chikako Yamauchi & Xiaodong Gong & Joseph Mercante, 2011. "Child Care Availability, Quality and Affordability: Are Local Problems Related to Labour Supply?," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 87(276), pages 109-124, March.
    11. A. Chevalier & T. K. Viitanen, 2002. "The causality between female labour force participation and the availability of childcare," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(14), pages 915-918.
    12. Bernard Convert & Hélène Ducourant & Fabien Eloire, 2014. "Faire de la sociologie économique avec Pierre Bourdieu," Revue française de socio-Economie, La découverte, vol. 0(1), pages 9-22.
    13. Andras Brody, 1997. "Books and News," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 289-290.
    14. Lars Relund Nielsen & Erik Jørgensen & Søren Højsgaard, 2011. "Embedding a state space model into a Markov decision process," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 289-309, October.
    15. Hussein Al-Bahadili & Arafat Abu Mallouh, 2009. "A Distributed Dynamic Channel Allocation Scheme in Cellular Communication Networks," Journal of Information Technology Research (JITR), IGI Global, vol. 2(1), pages 53-69, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    preschool education; Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey;

    JEL classification:

    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
    • J18 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Public Policy
    • C35 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models; Discrete Regressors; Proportions
    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (RANEPA maintainer). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.