IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Estimation of Interrelation between Corruption and Competition

Listed author(s):
  • Golovanova, Svetlana V.

    ()

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

  • Meleshkina, Anna I.

    ()

    (Competition and Economic Regulation Research Center, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

The article is devoted to the quantitative assessment of interrelation between corruption and competition. The authors summarize the results of theoretical and empirical studies of the relationships, as well as conducting their own assessment based on international data. The results show that the relation in the two-way one. On the one hand, increasing intensity of competition leads corruption behavior to become more prevalent. On the other hand, corruption oppresses competition, thus causing additional negative effects on social welfare. The last effect, however, is pronounced for countries with low and moderate bureaucratic barriers. If the barriers are high, the effect becomes opposite: corruption may support competition. Thus, reduction and facilitation of bureaucratic procedures is an important measure of the state policy aimed to reduce corruption and promote competition. The study revealed no statistically significant impact of income per capita on intensity of competition and the level of corruption in the country. The hypothesis that increase in freedom of mass media restrains corruption is also rejected. Thus there is no reason to consider this tool as an effective measure of anti-corruption policies. An important factor influencing both variables, is the development of institutions (property rights protection, the efficiency of the judicial system and law enforcement agencies). This result is consistent with the results of theoretical and empirical studies of other authors and emphasizes the importance of developing institutions to achieve both the goal of reducing the level of corruption and the development of competition in the domestic market.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: ftp://w82.ranepa.ru/rnp/ecopol/ep1665.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration in its journal Economic Policy.

Volume (Year): 6 (2016)
Issue (Month): (December)
Pages: 100-121

as
in new window

Handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1665
Contact details of provider: Postal:
82, Vernadsky pr., 117571, Moscow

Phone: +7 (499) 956 95 86
Fax: (095) 564-85-80
Web page: http://www.rane.ru/
Email:


More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

as
in new window


  1. Miller, William L., 2006. "Corruption and corruptibility," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 371-380, February.
  2. Campos, Nauro F & Estrin, Saul & Proto, Eugenio, 2010. "Corruption as a Barrier to Entry: Theory and Evidence," IZA Discussion Papers 5243, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
  3. Rafael Di Tella & Alberto Ades, 1999. "Rents, Competition, and Corruption," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 89(4), pages 982-993, September.
  4. Diaby, Aboubacar & Sylwester, Kevin, 2015. "Corruption and Market Competition: Evidence from Post-Communist Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 487-499.
  5. Pranab Bardhan, 1997. "Corruption and Development: A Review of Issues," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 35(3), pages 1320-1346, September.
  6. Hallward-Driemeier, Mary, 2009. "Who survives ? the impact of corruption, competition and property rights across firms," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5084, The World Bank.
  7. L. Grigoriev & M. Ovchinnikov., 2008. "Corruption as Impediment for Country’s Modernization," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 2.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1665. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (RANEPA maintainer)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.