IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

“Undermining the Case for a Trade War between the U.S. and China” - Una critica all’ipotesi di una guerra commerciale tra Stati Uniti e Cina

  • Moosa, Imad A.

    ()

    (RMIT University School of Economics, Finance and Marketing)

Registered author(s):

    Arguments are put forward to challenge the case for a trade war between the U.S. and China. The threat of a trade war against China is based on three pillars: (i) the Chinese currency is undervalued, (ii) undervaluation of the yuan is the cause of and cure for the U.S. massive trade deficit, and (iii) Chinese policies are illegal and immoral because they hurt not only the U.S. but also the rest of the world and China itself. It is suggested that no one really knows whether the Chinese currency is undervalued or overvalued, that revaluation of the yuan will not eliminate or reduce significantly the U.S. deficit with China and that Chinese policies are neither illegal nor immoral. - Vi è un acceso dibattito sulla ipotesi di una possibile guerra commerciale tra Stati Uniti e Cina. La minaccia di una guerra commerciale contro la Cina si basa su tre pilastri: i) la valuta cinese è sottovalutata; ii) la sottovalutazione dello yuan è sia la causa sia la cura dell’enorme deficit commerciale degli USA; iii) le politiche cinesi sono illegali e immorali poiché danneggiano non solo gli USA ma anche il resto del mondo e la Cina stessa. Lo studio evidenzia che in realtà non si può affermare con certezza se la valuta cinese sia sopra- o sottovalutata, né che la rivalutazione dello yuan ridurrebbe significativamente il deficit USA con la Cina e inoltre che le politiche cinesi al riguardo non sono né illegali né immorali.

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Article provided by Camera di Commercio di Genova in its journal Economia Internazionale / International Economics.

    Volume (Year): 64 (2011)
    Issue (Month): 3 ()
    Pages: 365-388

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:ris:ecoint:0627
    Contact details of provider: Postal: Via Garibaldi 4, 16124 Genova, Italy
    Phone: +39 010 27041
    Fax: +39 010 2704222
    Web page: http://www.ge.camcom.it/IT/Tool/Modulistica
    Email:


    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Mohsen Bahmani-Oskooee & Artatrana Ratha, 2004. "The J-Curve: a literature review," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(13), pages 1377-1398.
    2. Yin-Wong Cheung & Menzie D. Chinn & Eiji Fujii, 2005. "Why the renminbi might be overvalued (but probably isn’t)," Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
    3. Ronald McKinnon, 2007. "Why China Should Keep Its Dollar Peg," International Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(1), pages 43-70, 03.
    4. Reinhart, Carmen & Calvo, Guillermo, 2002. "Fear of floating," MPRA Paper 14000, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Coudert, Virginie & Couharde, Cecile, 2007. "Real equilibrium exchange rate in China is the renminbi undervalued?," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 568-594, August.
    6. Nouriel Roubini, 2007. "Why China Should Abandon Its Dollar Peg," International Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(1), pages 71-89, 03.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:ecoint:0627. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Angela Procopio)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.