IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

L’importance de la procédure dans les choix de loteries

Listed author(s):
  • Alarie, Yves

    (Centre de recherche sur les transports, Université de Montréal)

Registered author(s):

    Using a literature review we explain the motivations for the elaboration of expected utility theory. We show that the transformation of the role of this theory from being a normative tool to become a fundamental research problem is due to the numerous tests not yet explained. Then we discuss on the relevance of considering the procedure used by the decision maker to be the basic concept. À l’aide d’une revue de littérature, nous expliquons les motivations qui ont entraîné la création de la théorie de l’espérance d’utilité. Nous montrons que le passage de cette théorie du rôle d’outil normatif à celui de problème de recherche fondamentale est la conséquence de l’arrivée de nombreux tests encore non expliqués. Par la suite nous discutons de la pertinence de considérer la procédure employée par le décideur comme étant le point important à la base des modèles.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/602326ar
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Société Canadienne de Science Economique in its journal L'Actualité économique.

    Volume (Year): 76 (2000)
    Issue (Month): 3 (septembre)
    Pages: 321-340

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:ris:actuec:v:76:y:2000:i:3:p:321-340
    Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.scse.ca/
    Email:


    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:actuec:v:76:y:2000:i:3:p:321-340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bruce Shearer)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.