IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/smcjnl/v10y2022i1p135-149.html

Pathos in ECCs during COVID-19: Discourse Analysis Based on Sino-A Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Qin Xiong
  • Yichun Xu
  • Tongying Yang
  • Meixin Zhuang
  • Yunnan Peng
  • Pingrong Zhou
  • Liuxian Wu
  • Sitong Chen
  • Yuqing Fan

Abstract

This study compares the pathos strategies of Chinese and U.S. companies in the earnings conference calls. The earnings conference calls (ECCs) are important channels for listed companies to voluntarily present their disclosure. In the face of the covid crisis, different companies use different pathos strategies when summarizing the past operating conditions and expressing future development trends in ECCs. Based on the self-built corpus, this paper makes a comparative analysis of pathos strategies in the ECCs texts of Chinese and American companies in 2020 and 2021. We use the sentiment lexicon method and TF-IDF algorithm to calculate the sentiment index and keywords. The two parallel corpora show great differences in the following four aspects- emotional attitude, discourse perspective, ecological awareness, and actions. This research broadens the pathos research contents to the earnings conference calls and makes a certain theoretical contribution to the financial text research from the discourse perspective. The findings also help listed companies to further study how to use pathos in the ECCs to shape a good corporate image, enhance the audience’s perception of the positive image of the companies and attract more investors.

Suggested Citation

  • Qin Xiong & Yichun Xu & Tongying Yang & Meixin Zhuang & Yunnan Peng & Pingrong Zhou & Liuxian Wu & Sitong Chen & Yuqing Fan, 2022. "Pathos in ECCs during COVID-19: Discourse Analysis Based on Sino-A Companies," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 10(1), pages 135-149, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:135-149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/download/5573/5762
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/5573
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ferri, Fabrizio & Zheng, Ronghuo & Zou, Yuan, 2018. "Uncertainty about managers’ reporting objectives and investors’ response to earnings reports: Evidence from the 2006 executive compensation disclosures," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 339-365.
    2. Tim Loughran & Bill McDonald, 2020. "Textual Analysis in Finance," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 12(1), pages 357-375, December.
    3. Yu, Ai, 2021. "Accountability as mourning: Accounting for death in the time of COVID-19," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    4. Doris M. Merkl-Davies & Niamh M. Brennan, 2017. "A theoretical framework of external accounting communication," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(2), pages 433-469, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ciaran Heavey & Zeki Simsek & Christina Kyprianou & Marten Risius, 2020. "How do strategic leaders engage with social media? A theoretical framework for research and practice," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(8), pages 1490-1527, August.
    2. Hamza Bennani & Cécile Couharde & Yoan Wallois, 2024. "The effect of IMF communication on government bond markets: insights from sentiment analysis," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 160(2), pages 615-656, May.
    3. Dimitrios Vamvourellis & M'at'e Toth & Snigdha Bhagat & Dhruv Desai & Dhagash Mehta & Stefano Pasquali, 2023. "Company Similarity using Large Language Models," Papers 2308.08031, arXiv.org.
    4. Farrell, Michael & Murphy, Dermot & Painter, Marcus & Zhang, Guangli, 2023. "The complexity yield puzzle: A textual analysis of municipal bond disclosures," Working Papers 338, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
    5. Chia-Ying Chan & Iftekhar Hasan & Chih-Yung Lin, 2021. "Agency cost of CEO perquisites in bank loan contracts," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1221-1258, May.
    6. Dirk E. Black & Ervin L. Black & Theodore E. Christensen & Kurt H. Gee, 2022. "Comparing Non-GAAP EPS in Earnings Announcements and Proxy Statements," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 1353-1377, February.
    7. Brennan, Niamh M. & Edgar, Victoria C. & Power, Sean Bradley, 2022. "COVID-19 profit warnings: Delivering bad news in a time of crisis," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(2).
    8. Phillip C. Stocken, 2022. "Disclosure regulation and incentive uncertainty," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(2), pages 2267-2281, June.
    9. Thomas Hermann, 2018. "A rhetorical situation triggers accounting communication. The case of the conflict between the Bank of German States and the Government in 1955/56," CONTABILIT? E CULTURA AZIENDALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(1), pages 73-118.
    10. Di Cimbrini, Tiziana & Paolone, Francesco, 2025. "Accountability-based accounting in the blame game for post-disaster aid," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    11. Laurence Ferry & Noel Hyndman & Mariannunziata Liguori & Henry Midgley, 2025. "Public Accountability in an Unpredictable World: Tales of the Unexpected," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 61(1), pages 1-22, March.
    12. Jung Min Kim & Daniel J. Taylor & Robert E. Verrecchia, 2021. "Voluntary disclosure when private information and disclosure costs are jointly determined," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 971-1001, September.
    13. Bret A. Johnson & Ling Lei Lisic & Joon Seok Moon & Mengmeng Wang, 2023. "SEC comment letters on form S-4 and M&A accounting quality," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 862-909, June.
    14. Zheng, Yuqi & Lucey, Brian, 2025. "Central bankers’ political discourse as a driver of clean energy markets," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    15. Faccini, Renato & Matin, Rastin & Skiadopoulos, George, 2023. "Dissecting climate risks: Are they reflected in stock prices?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    16. Zhuoya Du & Qian Wang, 2024. "The power of financial support in accelerating digital transformation and corporate innovation in China: evidence from banking and capital markets," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-34, December.
    17. Aktas, Nihat & de Bodt, Eric & Dogan, Can Deniz, 2025. "Do investor reactions to merger announcements shape the writing of SEC filings?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(3).
    18. Gipper, Brandon, 2021. "The economic effects of expanded compensation disclosures," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1).
    19. Nicolas Garcia‐Torea & Belen Fernandez‐Feijoo & Marta De La Cuesta, 2020. "CSR reporting communication: Defective reporting models or misapplication?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 952-968, March.
    20. Xitong Li & Hongwei Zhu & Luo Zuo, 2021. "Reporting Technologies and Textual Readability: Evidence from the XBRL Mandate," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 1025-1042, September.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:135-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.