IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v13y2024i7p326-342.html

Strategic alliance: The contribution of the “Belt and Road Initiative†to easing trade restrictions for Afghanistan

Author

Listed:
  • Guiliang Tian

    (Professor, Business School, Hohai University)

  • Zaki Zakirullah

    (Business School, Hohai University)

  • Haihua Ying

    (International School, Hohai University)

Abstract

Afghanistan and most developing, landlocked countries must prioritize regional diplomacy and make strategic alliances to eliminate economic difficulties and create opportunities for trade, partnerships, and markets that will encourage further integration. This research aims to identify workable value chains for integration under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and evaluate their suitability by considering their potential volume. This research investigates how BRI is decreasing trade restrictions and increasing connectivity through the use of quantitative techniques and a survey research approach. The research results demonstrate that BRI can have a major impact on Afghanistan's economic situation, particularly with trade volume, trade restrictions, diplomacy, negotiations, and implementation of such kinds of projects. The Initiative has the potential to significantly reduce trade restrictions, and challenges, and enhance trade connectivity by utilizing significant infrastructure investments and investment in Afghanistan. However, security risks and political concerns prevent the BRI from achieving maximum connectivity in this country. This study contributes to thoughtful strategic alliances such as BRI can facilitate Afghanistan's trade connectivity, sustainable development, and economic integration by giving stakeholders and policymakers useful data to accomplish opportunities and know obstacles. Key Words:Trade Connectivity, Trade Restrictions, Regional Integration, Sustainable Development, Belt and Road Initiative, Strategic Alliances

Suggested Citation

  • Guiliang Tian & Zaki Zakirullah & Haihua Ying, 2024. "Strategic alliance: The contribution of the “Belt and Road Initiative†to easing trade restrictions for Afghanistan," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 13(7), pages 326-342, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:326-342
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i7.3658
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/3658/2538
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i7.3658
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i7.3658?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Soyres, François & Mulabdic, Alen & Murray, Siobhan & Rocha, Nadia & Ruta, Michele, 2019. "How much will the Belt and Road Initiative reduce trade costs?," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 151-164.
    2. Dang, Jingqi & Pang, Yipu, 2020. "Border effect of agricultural trade between China and the Belt and Road countries: a computable general equilibrium model analysis," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 23(3), May.
    3. Mindaugas Butkus & Janina Seputiene, 2018. "Growth Effect of Public Debt: The Role of Government Effectiveness and Trade Balance," Economies, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-27, November.
    4. de Melo, Jaime & Solleder, Jean-Marc, 2020. "Barriers to trade in environmental goods: How important they are and what should developing countries expect from their removal," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    5. Leamer, E.E., 1995. "The Heckscher-Ohlin Model in Theory and Practice," Princeton Studies in International Economics 77, International Economics Section, Departement of Economics Princeton University,.
    6. Marcus Bartley Johns & Julian Latimer Clarke & Clay Kerswell & Gerard McLinden, 2018. "Trade Facilitation Challenges and Reform Priorities for Maximizing the Impact of the Belt and Road Initiative," World Bank Publications - Reports 30477, The World Bank Group.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Damoah, Kaku Attah & Giovannetti, Giorgia & Marvasi, Enrico, 2022. "Do country centrality and similarity to China matter in the allocation of belt and road projects?," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 660-674.
    2. Michel Krah & Michael Kouadio & Fabrice Anzara, 2026. "Public debt and economic growth in WAEMU countries: evidence on the moderating effect of governance," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Peter Huber & Helmut Hofer, 2001. "Teilprojekt 9: Auswirkungen der EU-Erweiterung auf den österreichischen Arbeitsmarkt," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 19839.
    4. Chen, Maggie Xiaoyang & Lin, Chuanhao, 2020. "Geographic connectivity and cross-border investment: The Belts, Roads and Skies," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    5. Alice Nicole Sindzingre, 2021. "Economic Relationships Between Sub-Saharan Africa and China: An Alternative Theoretical and Policy Paradigm?," Post-Print halshs-03625159, HAL.
    6. Angella Montfaucon & Csilla Lakatos & Bayu Agnimaruto, 2024. "Trading in Green," World Bank Publications - Reports 41156, The World Bank Group.
    7. Marek Rojíček, 2010. "Konkurenceschopnost obchodu ČR v procesu globalizace [Competitiveness of the Trade of the Czech Republic in the Process of Globalisation]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2010(2), pages 147-165.
    8. Mindaugas Butkus & Diana Cibulskiene & Lina Garsviene & Janina Seputiene, 2021. "Empirical Evidence on Factors Conditioning the Turning Point of the Public Debt–Growth Relationship," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-22, December.
    9. Helge Berger & Frank Westermann, 2001. "Factor price equalization? The cointegration approach revisited," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 137(3), pages 525-536, September.
    10. Rodolfo Helg & Riccardo Faini & Anna M. Falzoni & Marzio Galeotti & Alessandro Turrini, 2001. "Importing Jobs And Exporting Firms? On The Wage And Employment Implications Of Italy’S Trade And Foreign Direct Investment Flows," International Trade 0103001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Bernard, Andrew & Redding, Stephen & Simpson, Helen & Schott, Peter, 2002. "Factor Price Equalization in the UK?," CEPR Discussion Papers 3523, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    12. Qin Chen & Yi Zhou, 2021. "Whose trade follows the flag? Institutional constraints and economic responses to bilateral relations," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(6), pages 1207-1223, November.
    13. Natalia Zugravu-Soilita, 2019. "Trade in Environmental Goods and Air Pollution: A Mediation Analysis to Estimate Total, Direct and Indirect Effects," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 74(3), pages 1125-1162, November.
    14. Zhao, Yujia & McLellan, Benjamin Craig & Wang, Chaofan & Shuai, Jing & Xiang, Wanting & Shuai, Chuanmin, 2026. "Risk dynamics and strategies of China's solar PV industry chain under trade frictions: A review," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    15. Belmartino, Andrea, 2025. "The role of green and non-green relatedness in the development of new green specialisations in Argentinean provinces," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    16. Aaron Marchant & Joshua Stroud, 2024. "Colombia – US relations in an era of great power competition," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(S3), pages 130-142, June.
    17. Dario Diodato & Ricardo Hausmann & Frank Neffke, 2020. "The impact of return migration from the U.S. on employment and wages in Mexican cities," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2012, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Mar 2020.
    18. Richard Nahuis, 2001. "Economic Development and Trade in the World Economy," Chapters, in: Sjak Smulders (ed.), Growth Theory in Historical Perspective, chapter 13, pages 313-334, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Chen, Yiguo & Luo, Peng & Chang, Tsangyao, 2025. "Economic Nexus among the Belt and Road Initiative participating countries," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    20. Carl Gaigné & Lota D. Tamini, 2021. "Environmental Taxation and Import Demand for Environmental Goods: Theory and Evidence from the European Union," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 78(2), pages 307-352, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:326-342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.