IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v10y2021i3p01-23.html

Covidomics & covidocial impacts:The relation between consumers’ fear of Covid-19, panic spending and saving behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Gul Ekinci

    (Social Science Institute, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey)

Abstract

In this study, the fear created by the Covid-19 global epidemic on consumers (general fear of viruses and fear of activity), spending (cleaning products, preventive health products, fresh and organic food and vitamin/mineral support, clothing, education, home purchasing, vehicle, loan. The relationship between buying, rental, fashion, vacation, travel, entertainment, electronics, home decor/furniture, mobile phone, activity and general) and savings have been tested. For this purpose, in order to test the relationship between fear, saving, and spending during the Covid-19 pandemic process, a Likert-scale online survey link was shared on social networks (Twitter, LinkedIn). The total of 385 surveys was analyzed using Google Form and SPSS program (Anova, Regression). As a result of the analysis, fear (general fear and fear of activity), spending (education, vehicles/cars, monopoly products, and tobacco products, games of chance, home buying and renting, loans, luxury/fashion, games, and toys, vitamins, minerals, and food support, public services, home, and furniture décor, electronic products (including mobile phones) expenditures remained the same, protective healthcare products, cleaning products, fresh and organic food expenditures increased, travel, public transportation expenditures decreased, holiday and entertainment expenditures decreased significantly). In the research, it was determined that 42% of the participants increased their savings by 30.5% slightly, and the amount of savings did not change at all for 27% of the participants. According to the results, as consumers' fear of Covid-19 increases, some spending categories (health products, cleaning products, fresh and organic food spending) and savings rate increase. In addition, it was observed that 90% of the participants canceled their expenses due to Covid-19. As a result of the research, significant relationships were found between the variables of fear, saving, and spending during the Covid-19 pandemic process. Key Words:COVİD-19, Consumer Behavior, Pandemic, Saving Behavior, Spending Behavior, Fear, Panic Spending

Suggested Citation

  • Gul Ekinci, 2021. "Covidomics & covidocial impacts:The relation between consumers’ fear of Covid-19, panic spending and saving behavior," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(3), pages 01-23, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:01-23
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v10i3.1147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/1147/830
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i3.1147
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i3.1147?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simona Botti & Ann L. McGill, 2011. "The Locus of Choice: Personal Causality and Satisfaction with Hedonic and Utilitarian Decisions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(6), pages 1065-1078.
    2. John A. L. Cranfield, 2020. "Framing consumer food demand responses in a viral pandemic," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 68(2), pages 151-156, June.
    3. Shinnosuke KIKUCHI & Sagiri KITAO & Minamo MIKOSHIBA, 2020. "Heterogeneous Vulnerability to the COVID-19 Crisis and Implications for Inequality in Japan," Discussion papers 20039, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tarek Ben Hassen & Hamid El Bilali & Mohammad S. Allahyari & Sinisa Berjan & Darjan Karabašević & Adriana Radosavac & Goran Dašić & Ružica Đervida, 2021. "Preparing for the Worst? Household Food Stockpiling during the Second Wave of COVID-19 in Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Valeria Borsellino & Sina Ahmadi Kaliji & Emanuele Schimmenti, 2020. "COVID-19 Drives Consumer Behaviour and Agro-Food Markets towards Healthier and More Sustainable Patterns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-26, October.
    3. Brenna Ellison & Brandon McFadden & Bradley J. Rickard & Norbert L. W. Wilson, 2021. "Examining Food Purchase Behavior and Food Values During the COVID‐19 Pandemic," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(1), pages 58-72, March.
    4. Erin Percival Carter & Stephanie Welcomer, 2021. "Designing and Distinguishing Meaningful Artisan Food Experiences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-13, July.
    5. Xu, Tengyue (Tsuki) & Wang, Enzhu & Yang, Zhilin & Zhou, Xinyue & Zheng, Guomeng, 2025. "Surprise discounts promote more effectively than unexpected discounts: The moderating effect of consumption goal," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    6. Hampson, Daniel P. & Gong, Shiyang & Xie, Yi, 2021. "How consumer confidence affects price conscious behavior: The roles of financial vulnerability and locus of control," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 693-704.
    7. Kovacheva, Aleksandra & Nikolova, Hristina & Lamberton, Cait, 2022. "Will he buy a surprise? Gender differences in the purchase of surprise offerings," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(4), pages 667-684.
    8. Hepola, Janne & Leppäniemi, Matti & Karjaluoto, Heikki, 2020. "Is it all about consumer engagement? Explaining continuance intention for utilitarian and hedonic service consumption," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    9. Axel Berger & Tobias Schlager & David E. Sprott & Andreas Herrmann, 2018. "Gamified interactions: whether, when, and how games facilitate self–brand connections," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 652-673, July.
    10. Mohammad Mohammad & Orsolya Szigeti, 2023. "Relationship Between Attitude and Online Purchase Intention of Dairy Functional Foods in Hungary: An Extended TAM Approach," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 545-559.
    11. Daniela Lavinia Balasan & Florin Marian Buhociu, 2025. "Sustainable Agricultural Development in the Southeast Region of Romania," Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development Studies, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Doctoral Field Engineering and Management in Agriculture and Rural Development, issue 1, pages 83-90.
    12. Chen, Lele & Jing, Kunpeng & Mei, Yupeng, 2024. "The effect of consumption goals on review helpfulness: Behavioral and eye-tracking research," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    13. Zhang, Yaqiong & Wang, Shifu, 2023. "The influence of anthropomorphic appearance of artificial intelligence products on consumer behavior and brand evaluation under different product types," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    14. Byun, Jaemun & Jang, SooCheong (Shawn), 2015. "Effective destination advertising: Matching effect between advertising language and destination type," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 31-40.
    15. Liu, Stephanie Q. & Bogicevic, Vanja & Mattila, Anna S., 2018. "Circular vs. angular servicescape: “Shaping” customer response to a fast service encounter pace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 47-56.
    16. Cong-Minh Dinh & Sungjun (Steven) Park, 2024. "How to increase consumer intention to use Chatbots? An empirical analysis of hedonic and utilitarian motivations on social presence and the moderating effects of fear across generations," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 2427-2467, December.
    17. Violeta Dimitrova (ed.), 2018. "Commerce 4.0 - Science, Practice And Education," Conferences of the department "Economics and Management of Trade", Publishing house "Science and Economics" Varna, number 1.
    18. Zs. Koczan, 2022. "Not all in this together? Early estimates of the unequal labour market effects of Covid-19," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(44), pages 5021-5034, September.
    19. Camacho, N.M.A. & de Jong, M.G. & Stremersch, S., 2014. "The Effect of Customer Empowerment on Adherence to Expert Advice," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2014-005-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    20. Fei L. Weisstein & Jeffrey Meyer & Jonathan Kershaw, 2024. "A matter of alignment? Effects of product types and environmental claim framing on consumer evaluation of sustainable foods," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 1661-1674, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:01-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.