IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Testing The Random Walk Hypothesis For Emerging Markets: Evidence From Linear And Non-Linear Unit Root Tests

Listed author(s):
  • Feyyaz Zeren

    ()

    (Department of Business Administration, Sakarya University, Turkey)

  • Filiz Konuk

    ()

    (Department of Business Administration, Sakarya University, Turkey)

Registered author(s):

    In this study, the random walk hypothesis for emerging markets has been tested. First of all,Harvey et. al. (2008) linearity test was made in this study where different time intervals were handled. ADF (1979) unit root test was made to the linear series in order to test the efficiency of the market based on the results of the linearity test and in stock exchanges in India and Russia where Brazil and China stock markets are not efficient, it was concluded that the efficient market hypothesis is valid. In addition, these results were supported by Kapetanios (2005) unit root test that allowed more than two breaks and structural breaks were endogenously. For non-linear series,Kapetanios, Shin and Snell (2003) (KSS) unit root tests were made and the efficient market hypothesis in Argentina, Indonesia, Mexico and Turkey is valid. In addition, it was found with the help of a time varying KSS unit root test which also takes the seasonal changes into account that activity at different periods for all markets was concerned but this efficiency was not valid at all periods for any market. This result supports the idea which was about the findings on the validity of the random walk hypothesis for many developing countries in previous studies that were not clear.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://www.rebe.rau.ro/RePEc/rau/journl/WI13/REBE-WI13-A5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Romanian-American University in its journal Romanian Economic and Business Review.

    Volume (Year): 8 (2013)
    Issue (Month): 4 (december)
    Pages: 61-71

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:8:y:2013:i:4:p:61-71
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Bd.Expozitiei 1B, Bucuresti, Sector 1, Etaj 3, 012101

    Phone: +4-0372-120.131
    Fax: +4-021-202.91.51
    Web page: http://www.rau.ro/
    Email:


    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as
    in new window


    1. Bogdan Dima & Laura Raisa Milos, 2009. "Testing The Efficiency Market Hypothesis For The Romanian Stock Market," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(11), pages 1-41.
    2. Kim, Jae H. & Shamsuddin, Abul, 2008. "Are Asian stock markets efficient? Evidence from new multiple variance ratio tests," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 518-532, June.
    3. Alagidede, Paul & Panagiotidis, Theodore, 2009. "Modelling stock returns in Africa's emerging equity markets," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 18(1-2), pages 1-11, March.
    4. Thomas Lagoarde Segot & Brian M Lucey, 2005. "Stock Market Predictability in the MENA: Evidence from New Variance Ratio Tests and Technical Trade Analysis," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series iiisdp92, IIIS.
    5. Kapetanios, George & Shin, Yongcheol & Snell, Andy, 2003. "Testing for a unit root in the nonlinear STAR framework," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 359-379, February.
    6. Khan, Walayet & Vieito, João Paulo, 2012. "Stock exchange mergers and weak form of market efficiency: The case of Euronext Lisbon," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 173-189.
    7. Maria Rosa Borges, 2010. "Efficient market hypothesis in European stock markets," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(7), pages 711-726.
    8. Zivot, Eric & Andrews, Donald W K, 2002. "Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil-Price Shock, and the Unit-Root Hypothesis," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 20(1), pages 25-44, January.
    9. Charles, Amélie & Darné, Olivier, 2009. "The random walk hypothesis for Chinese stock markets: Evidence from variance ratio tests," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 117-126, June.
    10. Ucar, Nuri & Omay, Tolga, 2009. "Testing for unit root in nonlinear heterogeneous panels," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 5-8, July.
    11. Cooray, Arusha. & Wickremasinghe, Guneratne., 2007. "The efficiency of emerging stock markets: empirical evidence from the south asian region," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 41(1), pages 171-183, September.
    12. Abdul Haque & Hung-Chun Liu & Fakhar-Un-Nisa, 2011. "Testing the Weak Form Efficiency of Pakistani Stock Market (2000–2010)," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 1(4), pages 153-162.
    13. Frimpong, Joseph Magnus & Oteng-Abayie, Eric Fosu, 2007. "Market Returns and Weak-Form Efficiency: the case of the Ghana Stock Exchange," MPRA Paper 7582, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 09 Mar 2008.
    14. Onour, Ibrahim, 2007. "Testing Efficiency Performance of an Underdeveloped Stock Market," MPRA Paper 15020, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. M. K. Hassan & S. S. H. Chowdhury, 2008. "Efficiency of Bangladesh stock market: evidence from monthly index and individual firm data," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(9), pages 749-758.
    16. Lim, Kian-Ping & Brooks, Robert D. & Hinich, Melvin J., 2008. "Nonlinear serial dependence and the weak-form efficiency of Asian emerging stock markets," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 527-544, December.
    17. Siow-hooi Tan & Muzafar-shah Habibullah & Roy-wye-leong Khong, 2010. "Non-linear unit root properties of stock prices: Evidence from India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 30(1), pages 274-281.
    18. Dan Ben-David & Robin L. Lumsdaine & David H. Papell, 2003. "Unit roots, postwar slowdowns and long-run growth: Evidence from two structural breaks," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 303-319, April.
    19. Burcu ÖZCAN & Veli YILANCI, 2009. "Türk hisse senedi piyasasının zayıf formda etkinliğinin testi," Iktisat Isletme ve Finans, Bilgesel Yayincilik, vol. 24(274), pages 100-115.
    20. Joshi, Nayan & K.C, Fatta Bahadur, 2005. "The Nepalese stock market: Efficiency and calendar anomalies," MPRA Paper 26999, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Fatta Bahadur K.C. Ph. D. & Nayan Krishna Joshi, 2005. "The Nepalese Stock Market: Efficient and Calendar Anomalies," NRB Economic Review, Nepal Rastra Bank, Research Department, vol. 17, pages 40-85, April.
    22. Fama, Eugene F, 1970. "Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 25(2), pages 383-417, May.
    23. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:30:y:2010:i:1:p:274-281 is not listed on IDEAS
    24. Mubariz Hasanov & Tolga Omay, 2007. "Are the Transition Stock Markets Efficient? Evidence from Non-Linear Unit Root Tests," Central Bank Review, Research and Monetary Policy Department, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, vol. 7(2), pages 1-12.
    25. George Kapetanios, 2005. "Unit-root testing against the alternative hypothesis of up to m structural breaks," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 123-133, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:8:y:2013:i:4:p:61-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Alex Tabusca)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.