IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecoprv/ecop_0249-4744_2005_num_169_3_7018.html

Premières simulations de la directive européenne sur les quotas d'émission avec le modèle GEMINI-E3

Author

Listed:
  • Laurent Viguier
  • Marc Vielle
  • Alain Bernard

Abstract

[fre] L’article a pour objet d’évaluer la directive européenne sur les quotas d’émission de CO2 menée à l’aide du modèle GEMINI-E3. Après un bref rappel de la directive européenne et une description du modèle, sont décrits et analysés des scénarios correspondant à différentes règles d’allocation envisageables. Si le mécanisme européen des quotas crée un marché unifié pour les entreprises éligibles, il peut provoquer en même temps des distorsions vis-à-vis des autres secteurs d’activité, et ceci , dans chaque pays. Il en résulte bien un prix du carbone unique pour l’ensemble des entreprises éligibles, mais un prix du carbone différent pour les autres secteurs, différent aussi d’un pays à l’autre, ce qui est à l’origine de surcoûts qui peuvent être importants. [eng] The article assesses the European Directive on CO2 emission quotas using the GEMINI-E3 model. After summarizing the Directive and briefly describing the model, we present and analyze scenarios for different potential allocation rules. While the European quota mechanism creates a single market for eligible firms, it can also cause distortions vis-à-vis other economic sectors in each country. The arrangement does yield a single carbon price for all eligible firms, but a different carbon price for other sectors — with variations from country to country. The resulting excess costs can be significant.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurent Viguier & Marc Vielle & Alain Bernard, 2005. "Premières simulations de la directive européenne sur les quotas d'émission avec le modèle GEMINI-E3," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 169(3), pages 171-196.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_2005_num_169_3_7018
    DOI: 10.3406/ecop.2005.7018
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecop.2005.7018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecop.2005.7018
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecop_0249-4744_2005_num_169_3_7018
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ecop.2005.7018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olivier Godard, 2005. "Politique de l'effet de serre. Une évaluation du plan français de quotas de CO2," Revue Française d'Économie, Programme National Persée, vol. 19(4), pages 147-186.
    2. repec:aen:journl:2001v22-04-a03 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Alain L. Bernard & Marc Vielle, 1998. "GEMINI-E3, un modèle d'équilibre général national - international économique, énergétique et environnemental," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 136(5), pages 1-2.
    4. Bernard, Alain & Paltsev, Sergey & Reilly, John L. & Vielle, Marc & Viguier, Laurent, 2003. "Russia's Role in the Kyoto Protocol," IDEI Working Papers 237, Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse.
    5. repec:aen:journl:2004v25-02-a02 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Marc VIELLE & Laurent VIGUIER & Alain HAURIE & Alain BERNARD, 2010. "A Two-level Computable Equilibrium Model to Assess the Strategic Allocation of Emission Allowances Within the European Union," EcoMod2004 330600153, EcoMod.
    7. Viguier, Laurent, 2001. "Fair trade and harmonization of climate change policies in Europe," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(10), pages 749-753, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Demailly, Damien & Quirion, Philippe, 2008. "European Emission Trading Scheme and competitiveness: A case study on the iron and steel industry," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 2009-2027, July.
    2. Gildas De Muizon, 2006. "How to Improve the Efficiency of the EU Emission Trading Scheme?," EcoMod2006 272100016, EcoMod.
    3. Damien Demailly & Philippe Quirion, 2006. "CO 2 abatement, competitiveness and leakage in the European cement industry under the EU ETS: grandfathering versus output-based allocation," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 93-113, January.
    4. Pierre Villa, 2009. "Equivalence entre taxation et permis d'émission échangeables," Working Papers 2009-05, CEPII research center.
    5. Damien Demailly & Philippe Quirion, 2006. "CO2 abatement, competitiveness and leakage in the European cement industry under the EU ETS: Grandfathering vs. output-based allocation," Post-Print halshs-00639327, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sonia Schwartz, 2009. "Comment distribuer les quotas de pollution ?. Une revue de la littérature," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 119(4), pages 535-568.
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4228 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Marc VIELLE & Laurent VIGUIER & Alain HAURIE & Alain BERNARD, 2010. "A Two-level Computable Equilibrium Model to Assess the Strategic Allocation of Emission Allowances Within the European Union," EcoMod2004 330600153, EcoMod.
    4. Després, Jacques & Hadjsaid, Nouredine & Criqui, Patrick & Noirot, Isabelle, 2015. "Modelling the impacts of variable renewable sources on the power sector: Reconsidering the typology of energy modelling tools," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 486-495.
    5. Natacha Raffin & Katheline Schubert, 2007. "International Emissions Trading Scheme and European Emissions Trading Scheme: What Linkages?," Post-Print halshs-00288394, HAL.
    6. Robert W. Hahn & Robert N. Stavins, 2011. "The Effect of Allowance Allocations on Cap-and-Trade System Performance," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 54(S4), pages 267-294.
    7. Frédéric Branger & Oskar Lecuyer & Philippe Quirion, 2013. "The European Union Emissions Trading System : should we throw the flagship out with the bathwater ?," Working Papers hal-00866408, HAL.
    8. Tol, Richard S.J., 2017. "The structure of the climate debate," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 431-438.
    9. Kruger, Joseph & Pizer, William A., 2004. "The EU Emissions Trading Directive: Opportunities and Potential Pitfalls," Discussion Papers 10679, Resources for the Future.
    10. Christoph Böhringer & Ulf Moslener & Bodo Sturm, 2007. "Hot air for sale: a quantitative assessment of Russia’s near-term climate policy options," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 38(4), pages 545-572, December.
    11. Yi, Wen-Jing & Zou, Le-Le & Guo, Jie & Wang, Kai & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2011. "How can China reach its CO2 intensity reduction targets by 2020? A regional allocation based on equity and development," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2407-2415, May.
    12. Bernard, A. & Haurie, A. & Vielle, M. & Viguier, L., 2008. "A two-level dynamic game of carbon emission trading between Russia, China, and Annex B countries," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1830-1856, June.
    13. Mihail Nikolaevich Dudin & Nikolaj Vasilevich Lyasnikov & Vladimir Dmitriyevich Sekerin & Anna Evgenevna Gorohova & Vyacheslav Viktorovich Burlakov, 2016. "Provision of Energy Security at the National Level in the Context of the Global Gas Transportation Industry Development," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 6(2), pages 234-242.
    14. Christian de Perthuis & Jean-Christophe Boccon-Gibod, 2006. "Le marché européen des quotas de CO₂ : leçons d'un an de fonctionnement," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 83(2), pages 115-132.
    15. Jérôme Rieu, 2002. "Politiques nationales de lutte contre le changement climatique et réglementation de la concurrence : le cas de la fiscalité," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 155(4), pages 95-113.
    16. Bouwe R. Dijkstra & Edward Manderson & Tae-Yeoun Lee, 2008. "Partial International Emission Trading," Discussion Papers 08/27, University of Nottingham, GEP.
    17. Martin Hrubý & Petr Čambala & Jan Toufar, 2010. "Game-Theoretic Modeling of Electricity Markets in Central Europe," Czech Economic Review, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, vol. 4(1), pages 032-061, March.
    18. Matti Liski & Juan-Pablo Montero, 2006. "On Pollution Permit Banking and Market Power," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 283-302, May.
    19. Löschel, Andreas & Lange, Andreas & Hoffmann, Tim & Böhringer, Christoph & Moslener, Ulf, 2004. "Assessing Emission Allocation in Europe: An Interactive Simulation Approach," ZEW Discussion Papers 04-40, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    20. Viguier, Laurent L. & Babiker, Mustafa H. & Reilly, John M., 2003. "The costs of the Kyoto Protocol in the European Union," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 459-481, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_2005_num_169_3_7018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.