IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecoprv/ecop_0249-4744_2000_num_145_4_6121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Les pays d'Europe peuvent-ils reproduire la réforme électrique de l'Angleterre ? Une analyse institutionnelle comparative

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Michel Glachant

Abstract

[fre] Les pays d'Europe peuvent-ils reproduire la réforme électrique de l'Angleterre ? Une analyse . institutionnelle comparative par Jean-Michel Glachant . Bien que la réforme électrique concurrentielle de l'Angleterre ait été pionnière, précédant de dix ans la plupart des autres réformes européennes, elle n'a guère été reproduite à l'identique dans d'autres pays d'Europe, même par les pays les plus favorables à cette politique. L'analyse néo-institutionnelle nous explique pourquoi. En fait, les réformes électriques concurrentielles combinent dans chaque pays deux ensembles d'institutions : les dispositifs institutionnels internes des industries et les environnements institutionnels nationaux. La comparaison des régimes institutionnels des réformes électriques en Angleterre, Allemagne et Norvège montre que le modèle anglais de réforme électrique est hors d'atteinte pour le plus grand nombre des pays européens comme pour les autorités de l'Union européenne. [eng] Can continental European countries replicate the English electricity reform? A comparative . institutional analysis by Jean-Michel Glachant . The new English electricity system launched in April 1990 was not reproduced by other European reforming countries. Institutions have played a major role, since reforms in the electricity industry involve two particular sets of institution: institutions internal to the industry and others in the national institutional environment. A comparative study of England, Germany and Norway shows that the English institutional regime for electricity reform is too specific to be a model for all European countries and for the European Union authorities.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Michel Glachant, 2000. "Les pays d'Europe peuvent-ils reproduire la réforme électrique de l'Angleterre ? Une analyse institutionnelle comparative," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 145(4), pages 157-168.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_2000_num_145_4_6121
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecop.2000.6121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecop.2000.6121
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecop_0249-4744_2000_num_145_4_6121
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hancher, Leigh, 1997. "Slow and not so sure: Europe's long march to electricity market liberalization," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 10(9), pages 92-101, November.
    2. Barker, Jr.J. & Tenenbaum, B. & Woolf, F., 1997. "Governance and Regulation of Power Pools and System Operators. An International Comparison," Papers 382, World Bank - Technical Papers.
    3. Oliver E. Williamson, 1976. "Franchise Bidding for Natural Monopolies -- in General and with Respect to CATV," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 7(1), pages 73-104, Spring.
    4. repec:mes:jeciss:v:30:y:1996:i:4:p:1212-1216 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Joskow, Paul L, 1996. "Introducing Competition into Regulated Network Industries: From Hierarchies to Markets in Electricity," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, vol. 5(2), pages 341-382.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thierry Kirat & Frédéric Marty, 2006. "La mise en œuvre de la réglementation : une lecture économico-juridique du secteur électrique et des marchés publics," Economie & Prévision, La Documentation Française, vol. 0(4), pages 101-116.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_2000_num_145_4_6121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecop .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.