IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecoprv/ecop_0249-4744_2000_num_143_2_6106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Révélation du CAP : question ouverte ou question fermée ? Une application à la biodiversité des forêts riveraines de la Garonne

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline Gauthier

Abstract

[eng] WTP Revelation: Open-Ended or Dichotomous-Choice Questions? An Application to the . Biodiversity of the Garonne River Forests . by Caroline Gauthier . This paper offers a contingent valuation of individuals' willingness to pay for preservation of biodiversity. It is the first study of its kind to be carried out in France. It has been conducted according to the rules proposed by the NOAA Panel, with the exception of the revelation method. The sample of 402 individuals interviewed was divided into those who declared their WTP on the basis of an open-ended question and those who declared it on the basis of a dichotomous-choice question. The two formats were then compared. The paper offers two tests demonstrating that the WTPs calculated by each method are not significantly different. Although the NOAA Panel recommends use of the closed format, this paper shows that use of the open-ended question is equally relevant and less expensive given the level of information required. [fre] Cet article présente une évaluation contingente du consentement à payer des individus pour la préservation de la biodiversité. C'est la première étude de ce type réalisée en France. L'étude est menée selon les règles proposées par le NOAA Panel, à l'exception de la méthode de révélation. L'échantillon des 402 individus interrogés est scindé entre ceux qui annoncent leur CAP suite à une question ouverte et ceux qui l'annoncent suite à une question fermée. Les deux formats sont ensuite comparés. L'article propose deux tests pour montrer que les CAP estimés par les deux méthodes ne sont pas significativement différents. Alors que le NOAA Panel préconise l'usage du format fermé, cet article montre que l'usage de la question ouverte est aussi pertinent et moins coûteux étant donné le niveau d'information souhaité.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline Gauthier, 2000. "Révélation du CAP : question ouverte ou question fermée ? Une application à la biodiversité des forêts riveraines de la Garonne," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 143(2), pages 237-245.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_2000_num_143_2_6106
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecop.2000.6106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecop.2000.6106
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecop_0249-4744_2000_num_143_2_6106
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thayer, Mark A., 1981. "Contingent valuation techniques for assessing environmental impacts: Further evidence," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 27-44, March.
    2. Spash, Clive L. & Hanley, Nick, 1995. "Preferences, information and biodiversity preservation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 191-208, March.
    3. Davidson, Russell & MacKinnon, James G., 1993. "Estimation and Inference in Econometrics," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195060119.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_2000_num_143_2_6106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecop .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.