IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0354966.html

Automatic uncertainty evaluation for determining the number of components in nested models and the shrinkage regularization parameters

Author

Listed:
  • Luca Martino
  • Roberto San Millán-Castillo
  • Eduardo Morgado

Abstract

In this study, we propose and examine two procedures for constructing intervals that capture the uncertainty associated with determining the effective number of components in model selection problems or the shrinkage parameters in a regularization problem. The output of these methods is an interval (defined by two integer bounds) representing plausible values for the number of components and/or shrinkage parameters. Notably, these methods do not rely on the availability of a likelihood function, making them broadly applicable across various domains, such as regression, classification, feature and/or order selection, clustering, and dimensionality reduction. These techniques leverage the geometric properties of the error curve to construct intervals. Extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrated the effectiveness and practical utility of the proposed procedures. In addition, a MATLAB code is provided to facilitate adoption by practitioners and researchers.

Suggested Citation

  • Luca Martino & Roberto San Millán-Castillo & Eduardo Morgado, 2026. "Automatic uncertainty evaluation for determining the number of components in nested models and the shrinkage regularization parameters," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-22, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0354966
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0354966
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0354966
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0354966&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0354966?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0354966. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.