IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0349682.html

Exploring the impact of specialist and generalist stars on organizational performance

Author

Listed:
  • Georgios Nalbantis
  • Christian Manger
  • Tim Pawlowski
  • Philip Yang

Abstract

We analyze the impact of specialist and generalist stars on organizational performance by linking the literature on star employees and specialization. Our adaptive role framework allows stars to switch roles over time. We develop a game-theoretical model to derive hypotheses and to empirically test them using basketball data. Consistent with theoretical predictions, the results show that teams with generalist stars outperform those with specialists. While a generalist switching to a specialist role always worsens performance, a specialist switching to a generalist role may improve performance. Additional estimations suggest that these findings hold for teams relying on a unique star rather than multiple stars.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgios Nalbantis & Christian Manger & Tim Pawlowski & Philip Yang, 2026. "Exploring the impact of specialist and generalist stars on organizational performance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(5), pages 1-23, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0349682
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0349682
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0349682
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0349682&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0349682?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0349682. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.