IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0335655.html

Blockchain-enabled strategic optimization: A decision analytics framework for multinational enterprises’ e-commerce entry model

Author

Listed:
  • Liurui Deng
  • Xiaoying Hu
  • Ying Xiao

Abstract

With e-commerce booming, MNEs (Multinational Enterprises) often tap into online markets through E-retailers in multinational e-commerce platforms. Therefore, which e-commerce entry model MNEs choose can be critical, especially when the MNE owning a retail division in the same market. Notably, the MNE can address the plague of low-quality images of e-retailers by introducing blockchain technology, but the effectiveness of blockchain technology for quality verification also varies across different e-commerce entry models. In this paper, we develop a two-tier supply chain model with a manufacturing division in a high-tax area and various retailers in a low-tax area. The retailers comprise the manufacturing division of the MNE and e-retailers. The e-retailers include self-operated e-commerce, FBP merchants, i.e., merchants handling sales while the platform manages product delivery and after-sales services, and SOP merchants, i.e., merchants separately manage operations, shipping, and sales. We find that the larger the tax disparity, the lower the overall profits of MNEs, irrespective of the implementation of blockchain technology. Furthermore, the overall profit of the MNE is more significant when adopting a singular e-commerce entry model without the introduction of blockchain technology; conversely, the total profit of the MNE is more significant when adopting a composite e-commerce entry model with the introduction of blockchain technology. Interestingly, when blockchain technology is implemented, the MNE is more lucrative under the e-commerce entry model with a medium initial market potential if the service gap between the e-retailer and the manufacturing division is modest.

Suggested Citation

  • Liurui Deng & Xiaoying Hu & Ying Xiao, 2026. "Blockchain-enabled strategic optimization: A decision analytics framework for multinational enterprises’ e-commerce entry model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(5), pages 1-46, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335655
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335655
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335655&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0335655?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Masha Shunko & Hung T. Do & Andy A. Tsay, 2017. "Supply Chain Strategies and International Tax Arbitrage," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(2), pages 231-251, February.
    2. Avner Shaked & John Sutton, 1982. "Relaxing Price Competition Through Product Differentiation," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 49(1), pages 3-13.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paulson Gjerde, Kathy A. & Slotnick, Susan A., 2004. "Quality and reputation: The effects of external and internal factors over time," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Ashantha Ranasinghe & Xuejuan Su, 2023. "When social assistance meets market power: A mixed duopoly view of health insurance in the United States," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 61(4), pages 851-869, October.
    3. Aurora García‐Gallego & Nikolaos Georgantzís, 2009. "Market Effects of Changes in Consumers' Social Responsibility," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 235-262, March.
    4. Zemsky, Peter & Adner, Ron, 2003. "Disruptive Technologies and the Emergence of Competition," CEPR Discussion Papers 3994, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    5. Nathan H. Miller, 2008. "Competition When Consumers Value Firm Scope," EAG Discussions Papers 200807, Department of Justice, Antitrust Division.
    6. Andr, Francisco J. & Gonzlez, Paula & Porteiro, Nicols, 2009. "Strategic quality competition and the Porter Hypothesis," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 182-194, March.
    7. Le Wang & Zhen He & Shuguang He, 2023. "Quality differentiation and e‐tailer's choice between reselling and agency selling," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(6), pages 3518-3536, September.
    8. Yushi Tsunoda, 2022. "When should a firm set its selling price to cope with gray market trade?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(1), pages 16-25, January.
    9. George Deltas & Thanasis Stengos & Eleftherios Zacharias, 2011. "Product line pricing in a vertically differentiated oligopoly," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 44(3), pages 907-929, August.
    10. Beschorner, Patrick Frank Ernst, 2008. "Do Shorter Product Cycles Induce Patent Thickets?," ZEW Discussion Papers 08-098, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    11. Ascensión Andina‐Díaz & Javier Campos & Juan‐Luis Jiménez & Jordi Perdiguero, 2024. "Strategic advertising in the aftermath of a corporate scandal," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 92(6), pages 663-699, December.
    12. Heidelmeier, Lisa & Sahm, Marco, 2025. "Environmental awards in a duopoly with green consumers," BERG Working Paper Series 207, Bamberg University, Bamberg Economic Research Group.
    13. Miljkovic, Dragan & Jin, Hyun, 2006. "Import Demand for Quality in the Japanese Beef Market," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(2), pages 276-284, October.
    14. Yoshifumi Hino & Yusuke Zennyo, 2017. "Corporate social responsibility and strategic relationships," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 64(3), pages 231-244, September.
    15. L. Lambertini & P. Tedeschi, 2003. "Sequential Entry in a Vertically Differentiated Duopoly," Working Papers 492, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    16. Bos, Iwan & Marini, Marco A., 2019. "Cartel stability under quality differentiation," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 70-73.
    17. Hélène Latzer, 2016. "Beyond the Arrow effect: a Schumpeterian theory of multi-quality firms ," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01387266, HAL.
    18. Cristina Barbot, 2004. "Low cost carriers, secondary airports and State aid: an economic assessment of the Charleroi affair," FEP Working Papers 159, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    19. Sanyal, Amal & Patibandla, Murali, 1999. "From Closed to Contestable Markets: Product Differentiation in Indian Durable Consumer Goods Industry," Working Papers 9-1999, Copenhagen Business School, Department of International Economics and Management.
    20. Grosser Joachim & Sonnabend Hendrik & Westbrock Bastian, 2024. "Close But Not Too Close? Optimal Copycat Strategies in the Light of Negative Publicity by the Original Product," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 24(2), pages 649-658, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.