IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0309659.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Data element investment strategy: How can leaders and followers innovate in dynamic market environments

Author

Listed:
  • Yinhai Fang
  • Wei Wei
  • Rengang Su

Abstract

In the era of the digital economy, the data element investment strategy decisions and game mechanisms of leaders and followers are crucial issues to be studied. To explore the environment in which digital collaboration between enterprises benefits both parties, this study initially proposes a three-stage game model of leaders and followers based on the sequential game method. Subsequently, we analyze the investment strategy choices for leading and following enterprises across six scenarios within dynamic market environments. Finally, numerical simulations are employed to examine the effect of both strategies on the industry and society as a whole. The simulation shows that (1) The cooperation strategy is a more effective approach for enhancing data-driven innovation performance, but when it comes to mature markets, this strategy may conflict with the interests of followers. (2) Followers can benefit from the cooperation strategy by significantly boosting the growth rate of data elements, but it may cause enterprises to lose their original market scale. (3) Excessively high initial production costs can negatively affect the innovative performance of the industry and social wealth, whereas mature industries can achieve greater industry performance and social welfare through investment in data elements. Considering the environmental characteristics of the digital economy, the findings of this study elucidate the ramifications of innovation strategies on enterprises, industries, and society, providing positive insights for two types of enterprises with different strengths to make apt decisions regarding digital cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Yinhai Fang & Wei Wei & Rengang Su, 2024. "Data element investment strategy: How can leaders and followers innovate in dynamic market environments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(8), pages 1-22, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0309659
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0309659
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0309659&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0309659?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mailath George J., 1993. "Endogenous Sequencing of Firm Decisions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 169-182, February.
    2. Guojun Ji & Muhong Yu & Kim Hua Tan & Ajay Kumar & Shivam Gupta, 2024. "Decision optimization in cooperation innovation: the impact of big data analytics capability and cooperative modes," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 333(2), pages 871-894, February.
    3. Kanger, Laur & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Noorkõiv, Martin, 2020. "Six policy intervention points for sustainability transitions: A conceptual framework and a systematic literature review," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(7).
    4. Kostas Mavromaras & Jason Qu & Ric Simes & John O'Mahony, 2017. "How Do Digital Technologies Drive Economic Growth?," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 93, pages 57-69, June.
    5. Wang, Ye & Jiang, Zongzheng & Li, Xiao & Chen, Yang & Cui, Xiao & Wang, Shipeng, 2023. "Research on antecedent configurations of enterprise digital transformation and enterprise performance from the perspective of dynamic capability," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    6. Prasanna Tambe, 2014. "Big Data Investment, Skills, and Firm Value," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1452-1469, June.
    7. Bichuch, Maxim & Hobbs, Benjamin F. & Song, Xinyue, 2023. "Identifying optimal capacity expansion and differentiated capacity payments under risk aversion and market power: A financial Stackelberg game approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    8. Wang, Hongxia & Li, Ming & Wang, Zhiru & Deng, Wenyueyang & Zhang, Zenglian, 2024. "Technological innovation strategies of information and communication technology enterprises: A comparative study of China, US, and Europe," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    9. Aleš Popovič & Ray Hackney & Rana Tassabehji & Mauro Castelli, 2018. "The impact of big data analytics on firms’ high value business performance," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 209-222, April.
    10. Calvano, Emilio & Polo, Michele, 2021. "Market power, competition and innovation in digital markets: A survey," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    11. Jiayi Jia & Yongzeng Lai & Zheng Yang & Lin Li, 2022. "The Optimal Strategy of Enterprise Key Resource Allocation and Utilization in Collaborative Innovation Project Based on Evolutionary Game," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-25, January.
    12. Peng, Yu & Lu, Qian, 2015. "Complex dynamics analysis for a duopoly Stackelberg game model with bounded rationality," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 271(C), pages 259-268.
    13. Baogui Xin & Yue Liu & Lei Xie, 2024. "Data capital investment strategy in competing supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 336(3), pages 1707-1740, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van Damme, Eric & Hurkens, Sjaak, 1999. "Endogenous Stackelberg Leadership," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 105-129, July.
    2. Bram Klievink & Bart-Jan Romijn & Scott Cunningham & Hans Bruijn, 2017. "Big data in the public sector: Uncertainties and readiness," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 267-283, April.
    3. Tian, Yi & Ma, Junhai & Xie, Lei & Koivumäki, Timo & Seppänen, Veikko, 2020. "Coordination and control of multi-channel supply chain driven by consumers’ channel preference and sales effort," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    4. Scherrer, Aline & Rogge, Karoline S., 2025. "When do incumbents adopt radical net-zero technologies? Analysing differences in strategy trajectories of European truck manufacturers towards alternative vehicle technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    5. Chen, Yutian & Dubey, Pradeep & Sen, Debapriya, 2011. "Outsourcing induced by strategic competition," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 484-492, July.
    6. Claudio Vitari & Elisabetta Raguseo, 2016. "Digital data, dynamic capability and financial performance: an empirical investigation in the era of Big Data," Post-Print halshs-01923271, HAL.
    7. Guth, Werner & Ritzberger, Klaus & van Damme, Eric, 2004. "On the Nash bargaining solution with noise," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 697-713, June.
    8. Gürtler, Marc & Sieg, Gernot, 2006. "Crunch time: The optimal policy to avoid the "Announcement Effect" when terminating a subsidy," Working Papers FW24V2, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Institute of Finance.
    9. Bertschek, Irene & Kesler, Reinhold, 2022. "Let the user speak: Is feedback on Facebook a source of firms’ innovation?," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    10. Lutfi, Abdalwali & Alrawad, Mahmaod & Alsyouf, Adi & Almaiah, Mohammed Amin & Al-Khasawneh, Ahmad & Al-Khasawneh, Akif Lutfi & Alshira'h, Ahmad Farhan & Alshirah, Malek Hamed & Saad, Mohamed & Ibrahim, 2023. "Drivers and impact of big data analytic adoption in the retail industry: A quantitative investigation applying structural equation modeling," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    11. Yu Yu & Weisheng Yu, 2019. "The Complexion of Multi-period Stackelberg Triopoly Game with Bounded Rationality," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 53(1), pages 457-478, January.
    12. Dong‐dong Wang & Kangzhou Wang, 2022. "Evolutionary game analysis of low‐carbon effort decisions in the supply chain considering fairness concerns," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(5), pages 1224-1239, July.
    13. Yingjie Zhang & Beibei Li & Ramayya Krishnan, 2020. "Learning Individual Behavior Using Sensor Data: The Case of Global Positioning System Traces and Taxi Drivers," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 1301-1321, December.
    14. Małgorzata Knauff & Adam Karbowski, 2021. "R&D Investments in Markets with Network Effects," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 225-250, June.
    15. Wadim Strielkowski & Dalia Streimikiene & Alena Fomina & Elena Semenova, 2019. "Internet of Energy (IoE) and High-Renewables Electricity System Market Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    16. Jörg Claussen & Christian Essling & Christian Peukert, 2018. "Demand variation, strategic flexibility and market entry: Evidence from the U.S. airline industry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(11), pages 2877-2898, November.
    17. Kristina McElheran & J. Frank Li & Erik Brynjolfsson & Zachary Kroff & Emin Dinlersoz & Lucia Foster & Nikolas Zolas, 2024. "AI adoption in America: Who, what, and where," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 375-415, March.
    18. Rehse, Dominik & Valet, Sebastian, 2025. "Competition among digital services: Evidence from the 2021 Meta outage," ZEW Discussion Papers 25-015, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    19. Zhijun Chen & Chongwoo Choe & Jiajia Cong & Noriaki Matsushima, 2022. "Data‐driven mergers and personalization," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 53(1), pages 3-31, March.
    20. Chrysostomos Tabakis & Maurizio Zanardi, 2017. "Antidumping Echoing," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 55(2), pages 655-681, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0309659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.