IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0306893.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying economic vulnerabilities induced by interdependent networks

Author

Listed:
  • Shokoufeh Pourshahabi
  • Shade T Shutters
  • Rachata Muneepeerakul

Abstract

Under economic globalization, countries are linked through trade and investments. This economic interdependence creates vulnerabilities. The indirect vulnerability induced by interdependent networks of trade and investments can put a country’s economy at risk, but this risk has yet to be systematically quantified and investigated. In this paper, we developed the novel Potential Indirect Vulnerability Index (PIVI) to capture how interdependencies between networks of trade and foreign direct investment (FDI) may induce economic vulnerabilities. The model consisted of three main components: a target country (the importer of goods), an investing country (the exporter of FDI), and the intermediary countries that export commodities to the target country and receive FDI from the investing country, serving as conduits of the vulnerabilities caused indirectly by the investing country. The PIVI quantifies the indirect vulnerabilities based on the product of two fractions: 1) the dependency of the target country on commodities from each intermediary country; and 2) the dependency of each intermediary country on FDI from the investing country. We demonstrated the utility of PIVI by examining the US economy’s vulnerability to China using 2019 trade and FDI data. Several Asian countries and a mix of agricultural products and raw materials were identified as conduits through which China could potentially influence the US economy. Vietnam was a sizeable risk because, while it has been a primary source of many US imports, it also received about 30% of its FDI from China. The US policy makers might opt to increase diversity in trade partners or to promote investment in countries such as Vietnam. We also applied the PIVI analysis to critical minerals, identifying cobalt, tungsten, and copper as the most vulnerability-inducing among them. PIVI is a flexible metric than can be aggregated and modified to provide a more nuanced and focused assessment of an economy’s vulnerability.

Suggested Citation

  • Shokoufeh Pourshahabi & Shade T Shutters & Rachata Muneepeerakul, 2024. "Quantifying economic vulnerabilities induced by interdependent networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(7), pages 1-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0306893
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0306893
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0306893&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0306893?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shade T Shutters & Rachata Muneepeerakul & José Lobo, 2015. "Quantifying urban economic resilience through labour force interdependence," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 1(palcomms2), pages 15010-15010, May.
    2. Gerald Schneider & Nils Petter Gleditsch, 2010. "The Capitalist Peace: The Origins and Prospects of a Liberal Idea," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 107-114, May.
    3. Luca De Benedictis & Lucia Tajoli, 2011. "The World Trade Network," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(8), pages 1417-1454, August.
    4. Yıldız Özkök & İbrahim Çütcü, 2022. "Does fiscal federalism matter for economic growth? Evidence from the United States," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(24), pages 2810-2824, May.
    5. Shade T. Shutters & Keith Waters & Rachata Muneepeerakul, 2022. "Triad Analysis of Global Energy Trade Networks and Implications for Energy Trade Stability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.
    6. Oded Cats & Erik Jenelius, 2014. "Dynamic Vulnerability Analysis of Public Transport Networks: Mitigation Effects of Real-Time Information," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 435-463, December.
    7. Groser, Tim, 2024. "Small State Diplomacy in Action: The Real Origins of TPP," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(2), pages 257-265, May.
    8. Wei Li & Dror Y. Kenett & Kazuko Yamasaki & H. Eugene Stanley & Shlomo Havlin, 2014. "Ranking the Economic Importance of Countries and Industries," Papers 1408.0443, arXiv.org.
    9. Heesuk Kang & Kyu-Min Lee & Jae-Suk Yang, 2024. "The potential for cascading failures in the international trade network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-26, March.
    10. Anthony Chen & Chao Yang & Sirisak Kongsomsaksakul & Ming Lee, 2007. "Network-based Accessibility Measures for Vulnerability Analysis of Degradable Transportation Networks," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 241-256, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Xiangdong & Qu, Kai & Chen, Anthony & Yang, Chao, 2021. "A new day-to-day dynamic network vulnerability analysis approach with Weibit-based route adjustment process," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    2. M. D. Yap & N. Oort & R. Nes & B. Arem, 2018. "Identification and quantification of link vulnerability in multi-level public transport networks: a passenger perspective," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 1161-1180, July.
    3. Kashin Sugishita & Yasuo Asakura, 2021. "Vulnerability studies in the fields of transportation and complex networks: a citation network analysis," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-34, March.
    4. Benjamin Büttner & Julia Kinigadner & Chenyi Ji & Benjamin Wright & Gebhard Wulfhorst, 2018. "The TUM Accessibility Atlas: Visualizing Spatial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Accessibility to Support Regional Land-Use and Transport Planning," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 385-414, June.
    5. Federica Cerina & Zhen Zhu & Alessandro Chessa & Massimo Riccaboni, 2015. "World Input-Output Network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-21, July.
    6. Flora Bellone & Arnaud Persenda & Paolo Zeppini, 2024. "The Rise of China in the Global Production Network: What Can Autocatalytic Sets Teach Us?," GREDEG Working Papers 2024-26, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    7. Almotahari, Amirmasoud & Yazici, Anil, 2021. "A computationally efficient metric for identification of critical links in large transportation networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    8. Caterina Malandri & Luca Mantecchini & Filippo Paganelli & Maria Nadia Postorino, 2021. "Public Transport Network Vulnerability and Delay Distribution among Travelers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    9. Lu, Qing-Chang, 2018. "Modeling network resilience of rail transit under operational incidents," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 227-237.
    10. Qing-Chang Lu & Shan Lin, 2019. "Vulnerability Analysis of Urban Rail Transit Network within Multi-Modal Public Transport Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, April.
    11. Zhang, Yihan & Xu, Jinwen & Yang, Wancheng, 2024. "Analysis of the evolution characteristics of international ICT services trade based on complex network," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3).
    12. De Masi, G. & Giovannetti, G. & Ricchiuti, G., 2013. "Network analysis to detect common strategies in Italian foreign direct investment," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(5), pages 1202-1214.
    13. Damoah, Kaku Attah & Giovannetti, Giorgia & Marvasi, Enrico, 2022. "Do country centrality and similarity to China matter in the allocation of belt and road projects?," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 660-674.
    14. Marco Dueñas & Giorgio Fagiolo, 2013. "Modeling the International-Trade Network: a gravity approach," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 8(1), pages 155-178, April.
    15. Paulsen, Mads & Rasmussen, Thomas Kjær & Nielsen, Otto Anker, 2021. "Impacts of real-time information levels in public transport: A large-scale case study using an adaptive passenger path choice model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 155-182.
    16. Cats, Oded & Jenelius, Erik, 2015. "Planning for the unexpected: The value of reserve capacity for public transport network robustness," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 47-61.
    17. Ye Chen & Zhuoxi Liu & Zhongming Yin, 2025. "Export competitiveness network of Chinese provincial agricultural products: E volution, performance, and influencing factors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-26, January.
    18. Barati, Hojjat & Yazici, Anil & Almotahari, Amirmasoud, 2024. "A methodology for ranking of critical links in transportation networks based on criticality score distributions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    19. Erik Braun & Emese Braun & András Gyimesi & Zita Iloskics & Tamás Sebestyén, 2023. "Exposure to trade disruptions in case of the Russia–Ukraine conflict: A product network approach," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(10), pages 2950-2982, October.
    20. Célestin Coquidé & José Lages & Dima Shepelyansky, 2024. "Opinion Formation in the World Trade Network," Post-Print hal-04461784, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0306893. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.